«Welsh Liberal Democrats are trying to give this Bill a purpose by introducing a much -
needed change to the voting system for local council elections.
Not exact matches
The report strongly recommends that any proposed
change to the
voting system would also
need to take into account whether it is necessary or desirable
to link the National Assembly for Wales constituencies
to Westminster constituencies.
Now, either Labour has a huge amount
to fear from forthcoming boundary
changes (and much -
needed reform of the corrupt postal
voting system), or Cameron is an electoral genius.
AV IS NOT THE REFORM WE
NEED: There are lots of genuine reforms which would go some way
to restoring people's trust in politics — but
changing our
voting system to AV is not one of them.
As a result, this May Britain will cast judgement on whether the
system it used
to vote last summer
needs changing.
We
need to change our
voting system now if we want
to see a parliament that represents the people!
The Labour deputy leader Harriet Harman added: «There is a general feeling that we
need to change the
voting system.»
The added factor of
needing a referendum on AV might slow the process a little, but would also likely see the Lords more readily accept the
changes to the
voting system (not wanting
to defy the democratic will of the people).
«While Labour fights a leadership contest and Lib Dems wonder whether they can
change the
voting system as a reward for their loyalty, Osborne
needs to win the argument that his measures are «unavoidable» — a word that recurred in his speech as often as «progressive».
«we
need to change our
voting system so that ultra-safe seats can be made a thing of the past.»
So while the Electoral Reform Society and other civil society groups are rightly campaigning for people
to cast their
votes on May 3, it is also recognised that
change is desperately
needed to spread the use of a proportional
system across the United Kingdom.
We
need to change our party funding
system so that we have properly funded parties able
to campaign for
votes across the country.
And we
need to change our
voting system so that ultra-safe seats can be made a thing of the past.
(8) the points made in the conclusion are: (1) consistent with avoiding expenditures on the criminal justice
system, the federal attorney general appeared
to be neglecting the plight of pre-trial inmates in custody in extremely bad jail conditions, and the provincial attorney general appeared
to ignore the
needs of prosecutors for greater resources of staff and time in order
to work adequately; (2) similarly, the other examples presented also support the proposition that the criminal justice
system is inadequately resourced because there are «no
votes in justice»; and, (3) the reduction in the safeguards against wrongful convictions caused by the radical
changes in procedures made necessary because governments do not provide adequate resources for the criminal justice
system;
Under Facebook's previous
system, a
vote was triggered if more than 7,000 users commented on a given
change — but 30 percent of the site's one billion users
needed to vote to make it binding.