Not exact matches
The fate of
health care reform in the Senate is uncertain, with members of both parties saying major changes
need to be made to the House version of the bill before the Senate can
vote.
All eyes in Washington today will be on whether the U.S. Senate can mount the
needed votes on
health care reform.
An attempt to suspend standing orders and allow an emergency motion on the
Health and Social
Care Bill was approved by a majority of conference representatives but failed to get the two - thirds majority
needed (235
voted to suspend standing orders...
Senate Democrats have only a one -
vote majority, so Skelos» Republican
votes may be
needed if some Democrats refuse to support Paterson's
health -
care cuts.
«Many Republican senators whose
votes are
needed to pass this have expressed concerns about deficit, have expressed concerns about
health care now being thrown into this again,» Higgins noted.
And not even one of the most ill - conceived Republican inspired
votes in Congressional history «to attach a bill to delay Obama -
Care» for a year with this nation's
need to pass a budget has stopped
Health -
Care Exchanges from opening nationwide today.
First, four Republican senators said Thursday that they oppose the larger
health care bill that includes the Collins - Faso amendment, meaning the legislation is short of the
votes it
needs to pass.
Washington (CNN)- Five more House Democrats said Tuesday that they will
vote against Senate
health care legislation, which puts opponents of reform just 11
votes shy of the 216
needed to prevent President Obama from scoring a major victory on his top domestic priority.
WASHINGTON — Upstate New York homeowners would get a huge tax break — and House Republicans would get a few more much -
needed votes for their
health care plan — thanks to an amendment that Rep. Chris Collins got added to that GOP
health legislation this week.
As majority leader, Reid is charged with getting the 60
votes needed to pass
health care in the Senate.
And the theory we were hearing from Albany staffers was that Chuck Schumer and company would get the
votes Obama
needed on
health care and New York would be rewarded with Race to the Top funding.
Yesterday, the U.S. senate
voted in favour of a new
health care bill, and while there are still plenty of hurdles legislators
need to overcome, it looks as though a major change is coming to the way our southern neighbours pay for the doctor.
The carbon cap might have passed in the fall of 2009, if Obama had made it and not
health care his top priority, and if the Senate majority had been willing to use the maneuver known as reconciliation, so that 51 rather than 60
votes were
needed.
To protect patients» access to Planned Parenthood's
health services, reproductive rights supporters
need to get out the
vote to elect leaders who will protect access to
care.
As for spending $ 122million on a postal
vote when it could be spent on
health care or something Australia actually
needs... That wanton waste horrifies me.