Berdyaev is profoundly right in insisting that all ethics
needs eschatology.2 One factor in the sickness of the modern world is the loss of confidence in any abiding significance of the transitory goods of life.
Not exact matches
I'm a pre-trib guy since I believe in the imminent return of Jesus, but I
need to study the issue a lot more since a lot of my theology has changed since I last studied this, and I am not sure what changes might have cascaded down into my
eschatology.
One may
need to look up words not used in ordinary conversation to understand what Berger means when he writes: «the problem of theodicy was solved in terms of
eschatology» or «one should not confuse epistemology (i.e., knowledge) with historical gratitude.»
The relevance of Whitehead's thought for
eschatology needs further exposition.
It
needs only a slight acquaintance with the traditional Jewish
eschatology to recognize that these writers are all using language which implies that the eschaton, the final and decisive act of God, has already entered human experience.
In chapter 3 I stated several reasons why I find difficulty in the apocalyptic view, though it
needs to be reemphasized that one may have an
eschatology that is not apocalyptic.