Sentences with phrase «needs less pollution»

And of course, the car is powered by a fuel - efficient 2.0 - liter four - cylinder engine that will reduce carbon emissions in a city that sorely needs less pollution.

Not exact matches

This novel blue form of the phenomenon, detailed in a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, burns almost soot - free, suggesting it could accomplish those tasks with less pollution than a traditional fire tornado if employed for industrial use — but more data are needed to say for sure, as the tiny efficient tornado has just been discovered out of the blue.

To begin to mitigate the pollution causing climate change, cities around the world need to be made more efficient, adopting measures ranging from reducing the energy costs of sanitation to constructing buildings that waste less energy.

Reducing the need for paper products means less demand for tree cutting — this prevents deforestation, protects wildlife habitats, reduces pollution and other negative effects of paper industry, the third - largest industrial emitter of greenhouse gasses.

Add to that, pollution and monocropping are stripping the soil of the very nutrients that are needed, generating less nutritious food each harvest.

The idea is the smaller we are, the less waste, pollution, and food we need to sustain.

nobody likes to spend a lot just to interact with some specialized support staff * micro SD card support * side buttons for flipping pages * wifi only, no need for 3G (cheaper and less signal pollution) * warmer colors * touch screen

We need less, not more, global warming pollution.

Zero population growth reduces demand pressure, less pollution, less resource use, less human conflict, and when there are so many positives and no strong argument that the world needs 12 billion people, it is «case closed» as far as I'm concerned.

Their energy bills will be $ 100 billion lower over the next decade, and America will have less pollution, more manufacturing, and more jobs for construction workers who need them.

«Emissions from Photovoltaic Life Cycles» found that even when accounting for the metals required to build PV cells, the efficiency of the cells, and the waste produced, PV cells still emit less global warming pollution throughout their life cycle than the fossil fuels needed to produce the same amount of power.

I have already made it clear elsewhere that the additional resistor effect of human CO2 would be insignificant in relation to that from the rest of the air and the oceans together with the varying solar and oceanic heating and cooling effects but we still need to know for sure whether it is significant at all over periods of less than several hundred years because that may be the time we need to solve our energy, pollution, resource and population problems.

Ecofys makes the mathematically obvious point that, since it is total carbon budgets which are the critical factor, the less we cut pollution now, the steeper we need to cut in the longer term.

I would argue that socialism is the greatest hoax / scam in world history... but the latest sales pitch for big government socialism is the need to save the world from «carbon pollution» — and now the slow economic growth inherent in socialism can be spun as good news — slow growth equals less «carbon pollution.»

No need to live in a cave, thanks, just less pollution please.

If we want to meet our Paris Agreement climate commitments and protect citizens from pollution and climate disruption, we need policies and regulations to make all vehicles — including trucks and SUVs — less polluting.

Finally, less of a need for transportation cuts down on pollution.