Chalie16, I read this summer an article about how technology can allow us to provide for the basic
needs of every person on the planet..
Not exact matches
Humans are capable
of forming ethical, well - reasoned decisions without
needing to perpetuate such incoherent, closed - minded fantasy... I swear, christians are among the most frightened, baby - brained
people on the
planet!
(1) At this critical point in the history
of this
planet, the greatest
need is for
people whose primary commitment is to the true well being
of the
planet including,
of course, and primarily focusing
on, its living inhabitants.
But given that most
of us Americans are the wealthiest
people on the
planet, and given that we're surrounded by
people who are starving to death, we
need to seriously question whether we're really listening to and obeying God if we're keeping 97 %
of our wealth for ourselves.
Maybe
people are not «fence - sitting», as you so inelegantly stated, but rather like myself have made a firm intelligent decision that religions are the cause
of some
of the most devastating periods in man's brief history
on this
planet and hopefully one day we will get past the
need to use religions as a crutch for a weak mind and instead select lifestyles such as Buddhism to evolve.
I'm not saying you or other deluded
people can't be nice, but I
need you to do it in a rational way using common sense, logic, and reason to the best
of your abilities for the sake
of everyone
on this
planet including yourselves.
The first
peoples worshipped the Sun and so will the last
of us
on this
planet... only because if one feels the
need to worship something what makes more sense then the Sun?
Important question John: Consider this, There are millions
of people on the
planet that woke - up this morning uncertain about where they would find the food or water they
need for them selves and their family.
Rather than sitting here trying to calculate the end
of our
planet based
on religious ideals, I think
people really
need to stop trying to influence others to think and do what they think and do.
People are realizing they
need to cut down
on animal meat eating for their own health and that
of the
planet, and that there is no excuse not to cut down, given all the delicious meat alternatives
on the market, with much more to come.»
you are very good
person i was looking over all the questions and your answer is divine i am not religious
person i like the word divine you are very good empath nice to have you my dear we
need more
of us
on planet earth, thank you
It is not only the Germany international star that
needs to pull his socks up for Arsenal and put in the sort
of performance we know that he can, but as he is among the club's top earners, if not the very top as some sources have suggested, as well as having the reputation
of being one
of the best creative footballers
on the
planet, you can understand why
people expect more from Mesut Ozil.
As the countdown begins for us to join
people from across the globe to celebrate WED
on 5 June 2016, we all
need to take part in environmental action and become agents
of change for positive impacts
on the
planet.
«We don't
need to find behaviours unique to each
person on the
planet,» says Neil Costigan, CEO
of Behaviosec in Luleå, Sweden.
Re # 8: «We
need to understand why
people are emitting GHGs at such high levels, and why they do not cease & desist (or at least reduce) in the face
of scientific evidence that GW may harm them and / or their progeny & others
on planet earth.»
Just a little bit
of yoga and meditation can go such a long way and give you the energy to have a truly happy life — and we
need happy
people on the
planet right now.
Designed to cover the daily nutritional
needs of busy, active
people, Athletic Greens is a natural, mega-nutrient whole food formula that offers more than any other greens or multivitamin and mineral compound
on the
planet.
Founded by a Peace Corps Volunteer, Kuli Kuli connects
people in the US in search
of nutritious food to those in the developing world who
need it through moringa, one
of the most nutritious plants
on the
planet.
The most important
of all dating tips - being positive reminds you that there are six billion
people on this
planet so you
need to remember that there is at least one
person for you out there.
We all know that Swedish men and women are amongst the best looking singles
on the
planet — and if you want to meet the most attractive
people on the
planet, then our club is exactly the kind
of matchmaking service you
need to experience!
The
people of Earth are desperate to escape the
planet's crime and poverty, and they critically
need the state -
of - t... Read
On
He can be one
of the funniest
people on the
planet, but he
needs a real dictator — I mean, director — calling the shots.
The reason you
need marketing is because most
people on the
planet have never heard
of you.
Delegates attending the opening
of WTM World Responsible Tourism Day were told that governments
need to do more to help the travel and tourism industry maximise its power to help the poorest
people on the
planet.
ReCore is a third -
person action platformer set
on a rocky, desert - covered
planet named New Eden, the site
of a terraforming project meant to create a new home for humanity after Earth is ravaged by dust storms and
needs to be evacuated.
I've been busy with other things, and besides, like Microsoft's Steve Clayton told me a while back, «It already has a life
of its own, so there's no
need to...» That being said, every now and then I'll come across someone in the Microsoft ecosystem, either via email, Twitter or in
person, who'll tell me a funny story about it e.g. like how they were in somebody's office
on the other side
of the
planet, and there they saw it, hanging
on the wall.
Re # 8: «We
need to understand why
people are emitting GHGs at such high levels, and why they do not cease & desist (or at least reduce) in the face
of scientific evidence that GW may harm them and / or their progeny & others
on planet earth.»
«For places like other
planets and moons, where resources are limited,
people would
need to use what is available
on that
planet in order to live,» said Shah, assistant professor
of materials science and engineering at Northwestern's McCormick School
of Engineering and
of surgery in the Feinberg School
of Medicine.
Besides setting a limit to the number
of people that should be allowed
on the
planet, we
need to set limits to the amount
of resources that each
person can use.
This is because the number
of people on the
planet is still growing and by mid-century we'll
need to roughly double the food supply — which,
of course, starts with growing crops, whether to feed us or to feed to pigs and cows and chickens.
The world
needs more
of this kind
of cross-sectoral collaboration to address the myriad environmental and societal challenges ahead, enabling 10 billion
people to live well
on a healthy
planet by 2050.
Mr McIntyre is exactly right: If we take Big Climate at their word that the entire global economy
needs massive re-orientation
on a scale never before contemplated, it will require the largest societal consensus â $ «left and right and center, in America, in Canada, in Britain, in Europe... Yet all Big Climate does is retreat ever deeper into its shrinking echo chamber and compile ever longer lists
of people who are beyond the pale â $ «Professor Curry, Professor Christy, Professor Bengtsson, Professor Pielke, Professor Soon, Lord Lawson, the Bishop
of Chester, the winner
of the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physics, the winner
of the 1998 Nobel Prize in Physics... It might be quicker for Mann, Trenberth, Gavin Schmidt and the other climate enforcers to make a short list
of those to whom they are prepared to grant a say in the future
of the
planet.
«uncertainty» equals no consensus but consensus is not proof this is just one classic example
of just more humans trying to justify their existence and no the IPCC Judith Curry and everyone else involved continue dancing
on the head
of a pin whilst Mr Ordinary gets his wealth sequestrated in order to pay for these guys to indulge in their pet hobby when the
person who is making their life possible derives no benefit whatsoever except higher and higher energy bills, more restrictions
on their ability to travel whilst again the lauded few get to travel across the
planet 1st class to tout their jaded theories
of how what and where and all I hope and pray is that we get another five years
of flat temperatures then you are all toast and in a great
need of having to work for a living or get another hobby.
Especially because many
of the changes that
need to be made to dramatically cut emissions would also materially improve the quality
of life for the majority
of people on the
planet — from allowing kids in Beijing to play outside without wearing pollution masks to creating good jobs in clean energy sectors for millions.
We
need your donation now to reboot one
of our most important information and action tools — the Ecological Footprint Calculator — so that millions more
people can measure their impact
on our
planet and take action.
And if water vapor is ever found for certain to be 1,000 times more potent yet the regulator / governor
of the climate — sometimes positive and sometimes negative, depending
on the
need of the
planet — the whole issue goes away and these
people cranking out reams
of journal papers that skirt the real central issue will have to go get real jobs.
We required this agreement to say: «For emission reductions we
need to have a just energy transition with a focus
on community - based renewable energy, we
need to have a sustainable food system where land rights are respected and food sovereignty are at the forefront, and we
need to not sign onto any
of these international trade deals that put
people and the
planet behind profit.»
In this, postmodern scientific era,
people need to be regulated, because as individuals, and as groups, they are risk factors to themselves, to each other, and to the continued survival
of the species and life
on the
planet.
Seven billion
people on the
planet need to be fed, so maybe longer growing seasons and wider growing regions will benefit the
planet more than spending tens
of trillions and bankrupting nations.
97 %
of people on the
planet have been brainwashed to believe they
need to go back to burning dung to power their laptop so that we can slow down the growth rate
of plants and speed up the transition to a normal period
of climate described as an ice age.
«I believe 99.99 %
of people on this
planet already have the values they
need to care about climate change in their heart.
Looking ahead at the accelerating energy demands
of the future, no single clean technology — not wind, not solar, not nuclear power — can meet the future energy
needs of more than seven billion
people living
on our
planet.
As Eban Goodstein, Director
of the Bard Center for Environmental Policy, so aptly shared immediately following the election, «Our work will not go away... Meeting the
needs of billions
of more
people all aspiring to a better quality
of life demands that we still rewire the world with clean energy, still reinvent the global food system, still rebuild smart and inclusive cities, and fundamentally, put sustainability and sufficiency at the heart
of what we are doing
on the
planet.
«Humanity has fabricated the illusion that somehow we can get by without biodiversity or that it is somehow peripheral to our contemporary world: the truth is we
need it more than ever
on a
planet of 6 billion [
people], heading to over 9 billion by 2050.
The United Nations invited each
of the seven billion
people on the
planet to mark this year's World Environment Day
on 5 June, stressing the
need of sustainable consumption worldwide.
GM Crops Benefit Companies Producing Them More Than
People Though proponents of GMO technology unfailing claim that such agricultural «advances» are needed to feed the 7 billion (and still growing) people on this planet — and well - meaning organizations such as the Gates Foundation push it on poor nations, much in the same way international lending organization such as the World Bank mistakenly did with export - led development in previous decades — the fact is that genetically modified crops in the balance fare no better than conventionally - bred crops in terms of crop yield or climate resis
People Though proponents
of GMO technology unfailing claim that such agricultural «advances» are
needed to feed the 7 billion (and still growing)
people on this planet — and well - meaning organizations such as the Gates Foundation push it on poor nations, much in the same way international lending organization such as the World Bank mistakenly did with export - led development in previous decades — the fact is that genetically modified crops in the balance fare no better than conventionally - bred crops in terms of crop yield or climate resis
people on this
planet — and well - meaning organizations such as the Gates Foundation push it
on poor nations, much in the same way international lending organization such as the World Bank mistakenly did with export - led development in previous decades — the fact is that genetically modified crops in the balance fare no better than conventionally - bred crops in terms
of crop yield or climate resistance.
Meanwhile,
on the foreign - policy front, the NOAA study projects «tensions between governments in the East and West [will] begin to fray as it is becoming clear that an entirely new level
of commitment» — read: huge amounts
of money — «will probably be
needed to address the relationship between
people and the
planet.»