The new provisions are an acknowledgment that multilingual America must do more to meet the language
needs of a student subgroup — comprising 10 percent of school children nationwide and 22 percent, about 1.4 million students, in California — that has trailed in graduation rates, college admission and other key academic indicators.
Not exact matches
What Times readers were not told, however, was that before NCLB, North Carolina, like almost every state, did not hold schools accountable for the performance
of various
subgroups, like minorities and special -
needs students.
While states under ESSA
need to identify for intervention only the lowest performing 5 percent
of schools, high schools with graduation rates under 67 percent, and some unspecified percentage
of schools in which at - risk
subgroups are underperforming, the National Governors Association reports that «40 percent
of all
students and 61 percent
of students who begin in community colleges enroll in a remedial education course at a cost to states
of $ 1 billion a year.»
Schools must report all results by
subgroup, but if the number
of students in a group won't produce statistically reliable results, the state
need not identify the school as not making AYP based on the
subgroup results.
• Ensure that all
students within a participating school are included in the pilot and that participating districts and schools pay appropriate attention to the
needs of different
subgroups in designing policies to make them as equitable as possible.
Various
subgroups of students, defined by ethnicity, gender, economic disadvantage, and
need for special education, must be making comparable progress.
We fear that putting
students with disabilities, English language learners and minority
students into one «super
subgroup» will mask the individual
needs of these distinct
student subgroups and will prevent schools from tailoring interventions appropriately.
Yet in addition to checking whether the lotteried - in and lotteried - out
students are comparable as whole groups, we also
need to check that
subgroups of students, sorted by the grade to which they applied, are comparable.
The primary aims
of this study are to document the process
of moving towards new, integrated systems in each
of these cities; to highlight which strategies moved the cities forward in creating these systems and what barriers the cities encountered; to examine how these cities incorporated the
needs of students with disabilities, English language learners, and
students from different economic backgrounds into their system designs; to understand how
students, teachers, and parents, and others experience elements
of the new system and how these experiences differed for
students with special
needs; and to document quantitative outcomes on a range
of measures, disaggregated by
student subgroup.
States
need not identify schools for «additional targeted support» annually because these schools are identified for having a
subgroup performing similarly to
students in the bottom 5 percent
of Title I schools; rather, states can identify these schools every three years, each time they identify their lowest - performing 5 percent
of schools.
Moving
students from a belief in the limits
of intelligence can counter the argument for tracking by increasing academic achievement for all
students, including high
needs subgroups.
High -
needs students in a school or district are often placed in a demographic
subgroup for purposes
of comparing their academic performance with those
of other
students.
Ed Trust encouraged the Dept.
of Education to «ensure states consider their
student achievement goals when deciding which schools
need help working with
subgroups of students,» and require summative ratings for all...
No, it won't walk away from holding schools accountable for
subgroups of students that weren't supposed to be left behind: racial and ethnic minorities, economically disadvantaged
students, special -
needs students and English learners.
Over the past decade, the focus on
subgroup reporting under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act has fostered a new understanding that schools and school districts
need to focus on the progress
of ALL
students for their schools to be successful.
85 %
of parents who attended sessions said «
Student Performance by
Subgroup» and «Teacher Quality» were the most important factors
needed on a DC school report card.
While Stephanie did mention her own instructional strategies as a part
of her evidence for lesson effectiveness, the function
of these strategies served to support her claims that she was attending to the learning
needs of this particular
subgroup of students, the English learners in her class.
Overall, as a group, teachers received lower scores on the Attention to Individual or
Subgroups of Learners rubric than on the Focus and Quality
of Evidence rubric, possibly indicating that attending to individual
students» thinking and understanding is a skill that
needs time to develop and is not prevalent in novice teachers.
How do you determine the
needs of different
subgroups of students across your district?
Grouping all the
subgroups together, she said, will ensure affluent districts are still held accountable for the success
of their high -
need students.
In an effort to improve conditions for special populations, ESSA requires districts and schools to address the
needs of subgroups of students that consistently underperform.
Average daily attendance won't tell you which
students or
subgroups miss class regularly and are in
need of intervention, and truancy numbers often hinge on the nebulous difference between what schools consider to be «excused» or «unexcused» absences, they argue.
Inform evaluations
of program effectiveness for various
subgroups of students and adjust educational programming and resources as
needed
(e) The board shall establish the information
needed in an application for the approval
of a charter school; provided that the application shall include, but not be limited to, a description
of: (i) the mission, purpose, innovation and specialized focus
of the proposed charter school; (ii) the innovative methods to be used in the charter school and how they differ from the district or districts from which the charter school is expected to enroll
students; (iii) the organization
of the school by ages
of students or grades to be taught, an estimate
of the total enrollment
of the school and the district or districts from which the school will enroll
students; (iv) the method for admission to the charter school; (v) the educational program, instructional methodology and services to be offered to
students, including research on how the proposed program may improve the academic performance
of the
subgroups listed in the recruitment and retention plan; (vi) the school's capacity to address the particular
needs of limited English - proficient
students, if applicable, to learn English and learn content matter, including the employment
of staff that meets the criteria established by the department; (vii) how the school shall involve parents as partners in the education
of their children; (viii) the school governance and bylaws; (ix) a proposed arrangement or contract with an organization that shall manage or operate the school, including any proposed or agreed upon payments to such organization; (x) the financial plan for the operation
of the school; (xi) the provision
of school facilities and pupil transportation; (xii) the number and qualifications
of teachers and administrators to be employed; (xiii) procedures for evaluation and professional development for teachers and administrators; (xiv) a statement
of equal educational opportunity which shall state that charter schools shall be open to all
students, on a space available basis, and shall not discriminate on the basis
of race, color, national origin, creed, sex, gender identity, ethnicity, sexual orientation, mental or physical disability, age, ancestry, athletic performance, special
need, proficiency in the English language or academic achievement; (xv) a
student recruitment and retention plan, including deliberate, specific strategies the school will use to ensure the provision
of equal educational opportunity as stated in clause (xiv) and to attract, enroll and retain a
student population that, when compared to
students in similar grades in schools from which the charter school is expected to enroll
students, contains a comparable academic and demographic profile; and (xvi) plans for disseminating successes and innovations
of the charter school to other non-charter public schools.
Advocates contend that the disparity in test scores, often referred to as the «achievement gap,» provides political leverage and forces politicians and other stakeholders to respond to the
needs of historically underserved
subgroups such as African - American, Hispanic, and low - income
students.
That's because more schools will reach the minimum number
of 30
students needed to report the results
of any
subgroup of students.
Ed Trust encouraged the Dept.
of Education to «ensure states consider their
student achievement goals when deciding which schools
need help working with
subgroups of students,» and require summative ratings for all schools.
It did not, for instance, specify the minimum number
of young people that would constitute a
subgroup (a factor known as the n) when reporting on
student performance, or specify that SWD would
need to be part
of the calculation for school completion rates, or define a host
of terms and timelines.
This high school graduation report also highlighted that while the gaps between
subgroups groups
of high
needs students remain large, these gaps are trending to close.
Emphasis on reporting the progress
of high -
need subgroups of students — such as English learners, low - income, minorities and
students with disabilities.
One
of her centers — the teacher center (blending with
students)-- appears to actually meet the AP bar
of teaching to
subgroups of students with different
needs and interests (dramatic centers, phonemic awareness center).
Account for
students transitioning out
of subgroups by requiring «a 4 - year cohort high school graduation rate to identify schools in
need of comprehensive support and improvement»
Board
of Education President David M. Foster said that persistent differences in the performance
of student subgroups underscore the importance
of the SOL program in detecting achievement gaps and in identifying low - performing schools in
need of state interventions and resources.
We fear that putting
students with disabilities, English language learners and minority
students into one «super-subgroup» will mask the individual
needs of these distinct
student subgroups and will prevent schools from tailoring interventions appropriately.
Continues to require collection, disaggregation, and publication
of data on high -
needs student subgroups.
For instance, Connecticut is proposing to combine ELs into a larger
subgroup of «high
needs»
students, including
students with disabilities and
students from low - income families.
* I DO NOT believe that it is fair to identify a district or school as a «Low Performing School» based only on a «
students with disabilities»
subgroup that varies by having different disability clusters
of students, at different ages, at different levels
of severity and
need, and in schools with different levels
of resources.