Sentences with phrase «negative eps»

Negative EPS, and the dividend growth profile is very erratic / poor.

The ratio shown excludes companies with negative EPS.

Although the number of companies that have issued negative EPS guidance is high, the amount by which these have companies have lowered expectations has been below average.

For the current fiscal year, 149 companies have issued negative EPS guidance and 116 companies have issued positive EPS guidance.

If these are the final numbers, it will mark the highest number of companies issuing negative EPS guidance and tie the mark for the lowest number of companies issuing positive EPS guidance since FactSet began tracking the data in 2006.

Thus, the percentage of companies issuing negative EPS guidance to date for the first quarter is 72 % (18 out of 25).

As a result, the overall percentage of companies issuing negative EPS guidance to date for the current fiscal year stands at 56 % (149 out of 265), which is below the percentage recorded at the end of September (61 %).

Since the end of September, the number of companies issuing negative EPS guidance for the current fiscal year has decreased by eight, while the number of companies issuing positive EPS guidance has increased by 15.

As a result, 80 % (45 out of 56) of the companies that have issued EPS guidance for Q1 2013 have issued negative EPS guidance.

If 87 is the final number of companies issuing negative EPS guidance for the quarter, it will mark the highest number of companies issuing negative EPS guidance since FactSet began tracking guidance data in 2006.

For Q2 2013, 87 companies have issued negative EPS guidance while 21 companies have issued positive EPS guidance.

If 80 % is the final percentage, the Q1 2013 quarter will have the highest percentage of companies issuing negative EPS guidance since FactSet began tracking the data in Q1 2006.

As a result, the overall percentage of companies issuing negative EPS guidance to date for the current fiscal year stands at 65 % (164 out of 252), which is below the percentage recorded at the end of March (69 %).

These numbers are also well above the five - year averages for the number of companies issuing negative EPS guidance (66) and positive EPS guidance (40) for a quarter.

Factset reports that a record high number and percentage of S&P 500 companies issued negative EPS guidance for Q2.

At the sector level, the Information Technology (+6) and Consumer Discretionary (+5) sectors have witnessed the largest increases in the number of companies issuing negative EPS guidance relative to their five - year averages.

For Q1 2013 overall, 45 companies have issued negative EPS guidance, while 11 companies have issued positive EPS guidance.

The Consumer Discretionary sector has witnessed the largest increase (+6) in the number of companies issuing negative EPS guidance and the largest decrease -LRB--6) in the number of companies issuing positive EPS guidance in Q3 2012 relative to Q2 2012.

If accounting earnings actually drove valuations, then companies with high EPS growth should command higher multiples, and companies with low or negative EPS growth should have lower PE multiples.

Not exact matches

Both have suffered negative three year EPS growth, and negative three year sales growth, KSS less so than Macy's....

Assuming the acquisition closes in late 2013, eBay expects the deal to be immaterial to its 2013 revenue guidance which it announced July 17, 2013, and to have a negative impact of $ 0.01 to its 2013 non-GAAP EPS guidance and a negative impact of $ 0.01 - $ 0.03 to its 2013 GAAP EPS guidance.

This is below our long - term goal of mid-teens EPS growth as a result of the significant negative impact of weaker international currencies on both gross margin and translated foreign earnings, as well as a higher effective tax rate.

While growing adjusted EPS, the company's economic earnings remained negative and were only getting worse.

Put another way, the bigger problem for bulls is that the share price seems blinded by the EPS performance and oblivious to the negative economic performance of Expedia's business.

FirstGroup (another U.K. stock) doesn't have a P / E or P / B that would knock your socks off (P / E is 7 or 9 depending on whether you're «adjusting» EPS or not, book value's negative) but it has an EV / EBITDA that would grab your attention (it's 3).

Also maybe 7 - 9 will explore the third way, making Eps 1 - 3 about becoming a sith and the negatives of the jedi, 4 - 6 about becoming a jedi and the negatives of the sith, and 7 - 9 about the balance of the third way.

AF — Aunt Flow (Menstruation) AI — Artificial Insemination ART — Assisted Reproductive Technology BABYDUST — Good wishes for getting pregnant BBT — Basal Body Temperature BCP — Birth Control Pills BD — Baby Dancing (Love Making) BFN — Big Fat Negative (Pregnancy Test) BFP — Big Fat Positive (Pregnancy Test) BW — Blood Work CD — Cycle Day CF — Cervical Fluid CM — Cervical Mucus DH — Dear Husband DPO — Days Past Ovulation EP — Ectopic Pregnancy EWCM — Egg White Cervical Mucus FP — Follicular Phase FSH — Follicle Stimulating Hormone HPT — Home Pregnancy Test HSG — Hysterosalpingogram IF — Infertility IUI — Intrauterine Insemination IVF — In Vitro Fertilization LAP - Laparoscopy LH — Luteinizing Hormone LMP — Last Menstrual Period LP — Luteal Phase LPD — Luteal Phase Defect MC (M / C)-- Miscarriage MF — Male Factor NFP — Natural Family Planning NP — Nurse Practitioner O - Ovulation OB / GYN — Obstetrician / Gynecologist OPK — Ovulation Predictor Kit PCOS — Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome PG — Pregnant POAS - Pee on a Stick PTS - Pregnancy Test Strip RE — Reproductive Endocrinologist SA — Semen Analysis TTC — Trying to Conceive

However, this shouldn't be looked at as a negative, as Ferrari states the new EPS system allowed its engineers to reduce the steering ratio by seven percent «for even more responsive steering.»

The real problem here may be return on equity (RoE)-- net income's actually negative right now, but management predicts annual EPS of $ 0.46 once the entire fleet's operational (all other things being equal).

FirstGroup (another U.K. stock) doesn't have a P / E or P / B that would knock your socks off (P / E is 7 or 9 depending on whether you're «adjusting» EPS or not, book value's negative) but it has an EV / EBITDA that would grab your attention (it's 3).

This simple, systematic strategy represents a significant improvement from today's growth indices that fail to produce faster growth in EPS and have provided negative excess returns.

I really don't understand the analyst / media obsession with Operating EPS, though — with the majority of FBD's investment portfolio in Bunds and deposits / cash, there's going to be a rather inevitable negative Investment Return variance for the foreseeable future.

Five Year Revenue Growth: < 1 % EPS Growth: Low or Negative Five Year Growth of Book Value: 7 % Dividend Yield: 5.64 % Five Year Annual Dividend Growth Rate: 15 % Price - to - Book: 0.93 I find HGIC to be a solid value at the current price, with a sustainable and large dividend yield, and a solid financial condition.