Sentences with phrase «negative book values»

Stocks with negative book values are usually excluded from this calculation.

Removing those companies (just 3 in this case) that each had at least a 5 % impact on the r - squared value, along with the companies that had negative book values, reveals a weak, 27 %, correlation.

For example, a stock would fail the Graham Ratio if it has small or negative book value per share relative to its price.

As a result, an extremely high P / B ratio (or even negative book value) may not be indicative of being overvalued.

Bad delists are bankruptcies, negative book value situations, and other negative events.

Could you comment on the debt and negative book value of RYAM?

The stock for husband's start up business sold for over 12 million dollars with a manager's carve out, although the company had a negative book value.

Not exact matches

«Value» is a negative term in my book, usually a sign that you are getting ripped off.

Write - downs or hidden liabilities can send the stock price below book value, as can a company earning a negative return on invested capital (ROIC).

Its economic book value or no - growth value per share also dropped from ~ $ 2 / share to a negative ~ $ 8 / share.

FirstGroup (another U.K. stock) doesn't have a P / E or P / B that would knock your socks off (P / E is 7 or 9 depending on whether you're «adjusting» EPS or not, book value's negative) but it has an EV / EBITDA that would grab your attention (it's 3).

The Fed has other holdings, on and off balance sheet, that would likely take the Fed's book value well past negative $ 400 billion if mark to market accounting were applied.

For several years I've had a hunch that, although a high price would make people trust and value your book more, they would also be more critical, leading to negative reviews.

you can add «treasury stock» back in to book value, which is a negative value on the balance sheet, as follows: Revised Book Value = Book Value — Treasury Stbook value, which is a negative value on the balance sheet, as follows: Revised Book Value = Book Value — Treasury Svalue, which is a negative value on the balance sheet, as follows: Revised Book Value = Book Value — Treasury Svalue on the balance sheet, as follows: Revised Book Value = Book Value — Treasury StBook Value = Book Value — Treasury SValue = Book Value — Treasury StBook Value — Treasury SValue — Treasury Stock.

But Graphite Corp. has no revenues, negative earnings, scanty book value, and has never mined an ounce of graphite in its existence.

By the way, I asked Heiserman about the tendency for some large - cap blue chips — names like Procter & Gamble, IBM, and Altria — to have a high intangible assets ratio and negative tangible book value.

Finally, the book value can become negative as a result of a long series of negative earnings, making the P / B ratio useless for relative valuation purposes.

For companies with a string of losses, book value can be negative and hence meaningless.

If a company is trading for less than its book value (or has a P / B less than one), it normally tells investors one of two things: Either the market believes the asset value is overstated, or the company is earning a very poor (even negative) return on its assets.

Only two measures, price - to - sales (P / S) and P / B rarely have a negative denominator, and book value is readily available on essentially all companies through decades of history.

Mitigating the negatives that can attach to high book values are three factors.

FirstGroup (another U.K. stock) doesn't have a P / E or P / B that would knock your socks off (P / E is 7 or 9 depending on whether you're «adjusting» EPS or not, book value's negative) but it has an EV / EBITDA that would grab your attention (it's 3).

Many value books emphasize management, mgmt to me is usually worthless at best to generally a negative value for most other companies.

The «market» here is an equal weight, and total return average of all deciles, and includes stocks with negative earnings, cashflow, or book value.

Further, they have bought back so much stock that not only is the company's tangible book value negative, but the unadjusted book value is negative too.

Five Year Revenue Growth: < 1 % EPS Growth: Low or Negative Five Year Growth of Book Value: 7 % Dividend Yield: 5.64 % Five Year Annual Dividend Growth Rate: 15 % Price - to - Book: 0.93 I find HGIC to be a solid value at the current price, with a sustainable and large dividend yield, and a solid financial condiValue: 7 % Dividend Yield: 5.64 % Five Year Annual Dividend Growth Rate: 15 % Price - to - Book: 0.93 I find HGIC to be a solid value at the current price, with a sustainable and large dividend yield, and a solid financial condivalue at the current price, with a sustainable and large dividend yield, and a solid financial condition.

In fact, later in the book he argues for a long - term alpha value of about 3.0 W / m ^ 2 / °C, indicating a weak positive feedback, rather than a strongly negative one.