Sentences with phrase «negative feedback from other»

But in social settings, it's hard for me to accept her as she is, because I get negative feedback from other moms.

Confidence in the services you deliver will help with blocking out negative feedback from others and will bring you one step closer to reaching your full potential.

The Steel update rips out the original turn - based combat which, although I didn't have any major problem with, received some negative feedback from others.

Even though negative feedback from others may feel like a personal attack, it can provide helpful clues for self - improvement and healthier relationships.

Not exact matches

Push for the formation of a Parent Advisory Group (PAC) consisting of parents with children currently playing in the program to provide the Board of Directors with feedback (both negative and positive) from other parents; the input helps to insure that its decisions are reflective of, and responsive to, a broad cross-section of the youth sports community.

Overall, without excluding the negative feedback it got from some users, the Baby Jogger City Select Double Stroller is still one of the most highly appreciated strollers by most parents who have decided to buy this model for their babies and take the time to review their experience, although there are other budget - friendlier choices available.

Though it has received some negative comments, majority of the feedback from other parents have been positive and encouraging.

In other words, in the context of nearly continuous negative attention, the University has not persuaded its critics (from within and outside the University) that it is interested in more than protecting its reputation and that it is instead open to feedback, able to acknowledge its errors, and will take responsibility for deficiencies and their consequences.»

I'm not even an amateur climate scientist, but my logic tells me that if clouds have a stronger negative feedback in the Arctic, and I know (from news) the Arctic is warming faster than other areas, then it seems «forcing GHGs» (CO2, etc) may have a strong sensitivity than suggested, but this is suppressed by the cloud effect.

This is consistent with work in other systems that showed transcripts from BR biosynthesis genes accumulated following loss of BR due to negative feedback regulation (Bancoş et al., 2002; Tanabe et al., 2005; Tanaka et al., 2005).

We've gathered a few success stories (plus some negative feedback) from each site so you can get an idea of what other people think.

First - and second - grade students in 1993 who had been kept out of kindergarten until they were older were less likely than other students to draw negative feedback from teachers about their academic performance or conduct in class.

We had received some negative feedback comments, regarding our communications, varying from examples of poor grammatical accuracy, to instances in which the tone of emails, letters, and other forms of correspondence were perceived as rude.

«When I was hearing feedback from other peers and that teachers are using it for positive and negative consequences, I said, «Wow.

One from the University of Richmond concluded that increasing class size to 30 students to 45 had a negative impact on the amount of critical and analytical thinking required in business classes, on the clarity of presentations, the effectiveness of teaching methods, the instructor's ability to keep students interested, and the timeliness of feedback, among many other key factors of educational quality.

If you ever start to think about going to agents with bad reputations simply because you have received mostly negative feedback from reputable agents, you should stop, shut down the computer, and distract yourself with something like a movie or any other activity you enjoy doing.

It is far better to set rules that provide negative feedback to banks that are taking too much risk, and negative feedback to those who borrow from or lend to other banks, which increases systemic risk.

One other point on cloud feedbacks from a paleoclimate perspective — if a strong negative cloud feedback begins at modern earth temperatures, it would be unlikely for past temperatures to have exceeded modern ones.

If we isolate the ocean for diagnosis, there is a rather short list of suspect forcings and feedbacks (ie changes in shortwave reaching ocean surface possibly from strong negative aerosol feedbacks, net positive rate change in loss of longwave from the ocean (which would have implications for the positive WVF), net positive heat loss through evaporation without balancing compensation (with other implications for positive WVF).

Intuitively, the models seem to be running hot because (a) their climate response rate to doubling of CO2 is too high and (b) they do not adequately allow for negative feedbacks from clouds, among other influences which must remain beyond the realm of prediction due to their chaotic nature.

It is entirely possible the warming from increasing concentration of CO2 leads to other factors which have a negative feedback.

In the real world, «all other things» are most definitely NOT «held equal,» the feedbacks are offsetting / negative feedbacks (which can be seen from the Earth's climate history, which does NOT show any effect of CO2 levels on temperature), and the «real world» effect is essentially nil.

So, returning to the subject: First of all, we were talking about negative feedbacks from clouds, not other types of feedbacks.

Most of the other skeptics keep quiet about the clouds reducing during the rapid warming from 1970 - 2000, because that is exactly opposite to their hopes of a negative cloud feedback, and supports the positive feedback idea more.

Jim D: Most of the other skeptics keep quiet about the clouds reducing during the rapid warming from 1970 - 2000, because that is exactly opposite to their hopes of a negative cloud feedback, and supports the positive feedback idea more.

They (as I read AR5) do mean the GHG forcing was 110 % and that there was a 10 % negative forcing from the sum of all other feedbacks.

-- For the feedbacks (outside from the main S - B negative feedback, which is traditionaly separated from the other feedbacks), I think that the assumption may be not valid, because of water.

This study therefore suggests the rapid response to CO2 forcing is (apart from a possible small negative response from LW water vapour) essentially confined to cloud fraction changes affecting SW radiation, and further that significant feedbacks with temperature occur in all cloud components (including this one), and indeed in all other classically understood «feedbacks».

In particular: i) the emphasis on reconstructions of historical temperature records; ii) the over-sensitivity of climate models; iii) the exaggeration of positive feedback mechanisms and the opposite with respect to negative feedbacks; iv) the over-statement of second and Nth - order effects of warming on natural processes and society as «impacts»; v) the IPCC reports are not written exclusively by scientists, but in the case of WGII and WGIII especially, are, as has been discovered — by sceptics — written by academics from other disciplines, often without any remarkable expertise, and by activists, with particular agendas.

Nor have they dropped their non-mainstream views regarding things like negative feedbacks and other stuff that will save us from the mainstream view that climate sensitivity to a doubling of CO2 is about 3C.

From all that I have read of Roy Spencer's, Roger Pielke Sr's, Courtillot's and others, it seems to me that the net feedback in the climate system is negative and tied to that magical substance, water.

RealClimate is wonderful, and an excellent source of reliable information.As I've said before, methane is an extremely dangerous component to global warming.Comment # 20 is correct.There is a sharp melting point to frozen methane.A huge increase in the release of methane could happen within the next 50 years.At what point in the Earth's temperature rise and the rise of co2 would a huge methane melt occur?No one has answered that definitive issue.If I ask you all at what point would huge amounts of extra methane start melting, i.e at what temperature rise of the ocean near the Artic methane ice deposits would the methane melt, or at what point in the rise of co2 concentrations in the atmosphere would the methane melt, I believe that no one could currently tell me the actual answer as to where the sharp melting point exists.Of course, once that tipping point has been reached, and billions of tons of methane outgass from what had been locked stores of methane, locked away for an eternity, it is exactly the same as the burning of stored fossil fuels which have been stored for an eternity as well.And even though methane does not have as long a life as co2, while it is around in the air it can cause other tipping points, i.e. permafrost melting, to arrive much sooner.I will reiterate what I've said before on this and other sites.Methane is a hugely underreported, underestimated risk.How about RealClimate attempts to model exactly what would happen to other tipping points, such as the melting permafrost, if indeed a huge increase in the melting of the methal hydrate ice WERE to occur within the next 50 years.My amateur guess is that the huge, albeit temporary, increase in methane over even three or four decades might push other relevent tipping points to arrive much, much, sooner than they normally would, thereby vastly incresing negative feedback mechanisms.We KNOW that quick, huge, changes occured in the Earth's climate in the past.See other relevent posts in the past from Realclimate.Climate often does not change slowly, but undergoes huge, quick, changes periodically, due to negative feedbacks accumulating, and tipping the climate to a quick change.Why should the danger from huge potential methane releases be vievwed with any less trepidation?

The net negative cloud feedback (primarily resulting from SW reflection by increased low altitude clouds) was also confirmed in the other studies I cited.

On the one hand he can't admit to a feedback factor of 2.5 from his own numbers, but on the other he can't say this warming is just due to cloud changes, because that hurts his friends» theories about net negative cloud feedback.

Instead of compensating for distortion as other amps do through a negative feedback loop, the AMP CS2 simply avoids it, believing that it's better to avoid distortion from the start than to try to correct it later.

For instance, in their prospective study among young adolescents, Garber and Flynn (Garber and Flynn, 2001) found that negative self - worth develops as an outcome of low maternal acceptance, a maternal history of depression and exposure to negative interpersonal contexts, such as negative parenting practices, early history of child maltreatment, negative feedback from significant others on one's competence, and family discord and disruption.

Some follow the pressure from family and friends and decide to leave their partner; the negative feedback and consequences they perceive from others outweighs the pros of staying with their partner.