Sentences with phrase «negative free cash»

However, I'm not worried about the occasional weak or negative free cash flow value as it may just mean heavy investment in something or other.

Which clearly presents attractive long term opportunities, but also substantial risks — not least of which is the company's over-indebtedness (despite any expected use of net IPO proceeds), cumulative net losses, negative free cash flow, poor governance & related - party deals, and possible equity dilution to come.

[Of course, there was precious little point dwelling on flat revenues, declining ARPU, cumulative losses, and negative free cash flow!?

# 1 - They have a long history of negative free cash flow.

YTD, CVX has generated negative free cash flow of about $ 5 billion (closer to flat including asset sales), and COP's free cash flow checks in at negative $ 2.1 billion (including asset sales).

It can handle negative free cash flows without having to do anything special.

The exponential model requires that the data is non negative, so you have to transform the data if you end up with some years of negative free cash flows.

As an aside, you can stay clear of a lot of blowups by avoiding companies that have strong earnings and weak or negative free cash flow.

The 75 Utilities companies that we cover have had negative free cash flow in four of the past five years, with a cumulative cash burn of almost $ 150 billion over that time.

However, we have no problem with stocks that make a profit but plow back in everything they make and then some (negative free cash flow), as long as they are generating sufficient returns on capital.

The firms rising costs, coupled with its negative free cash flow -LRB-- $ 1.6 billion in 2015) are not a winning business strategy.

The company has had negative free cash flow in five out of the past six years, and it has burned through roughly $ 75 million in the past two years.

On the flip side, dividends from companies with low or negative free cash flow can not be trusted as much because the company may not be able to sustain paying dividends.

• Tesla's negative free cash flow increased to about $ 1 billion in the first quarter, up from $ 277 million during the fourth quarter of last year.

Along with the acquisition spending, this increased capex has led CST to have nearly $ 1.7 billion in negative free cash flows over the past three years.

Dividend yields from companies with low or negative free cash flow can not be trusted as much because they may not be able to sustain their dividend for much longer.

After negative free cash flow in 2016, the energy giant is back in the black.

On the second quarter conference call, the CEO stated, «In some senses the negative free cash flow will be an indicator of enormous success.»

Negative free cash flow ballooned to $ 1 billion after $ 277 million in the fourth quarter.

An analysis by Bloomberg found the company spends more than $ 6,500 every minute and has had negative free cash flow for five quarters.

Tesla burned through cash during the quarter with a negative free cash flow of $ 276.8 million.

Negative free cash flow has been the main source of concern for many Wall Street analysts who are otherwise bullish on the stock.

In the letter, Netflix also reiterated that it expects to have a negative free cash flow of $ 2 billion in 2017, versus $ 1.7 billion in 2016.

While Tesla expressed confidence about the second half of the year, negative free cash flow was more than $ 1 billion for the third time in the last four quarters.

«The negative free cash flow will be $ 500 million this quarter and probably get worse throughout the year.»

Not exact matches

Free cash flow, a key metric of financial health, widened to negative $ 1 billion in the first quarter from negative $ 277 million in the fourth quarter, excluding costs of systems for its solar business.

In reality, free cash flow has been highly negative with a cumulative - $ 38.4 billion in losses over the same time frame.

For example, the above mentioned NFLX — which is a great company with great subscriber growth rates — reported free cash flows of a negative $ 2 billion last year and plans to burn through $ 3 to $ 4 billion in the current year.

As we can see, the business is usually quite cash generative, only Reply has negative free cashflow.

Tesla's free cash flow was negative $ 1.05 billion, highlighting the company's need for its Model 3 production ramp - up to go smoothly.

Or, the stock has a free cash flow yield of 10 % and is growing 3 %, or 5 %, or 8 % - or really anything but 0 % or negative percent.

While the company's non-GAAP «cash earnings» have been highly positive, growing from $ 421 million in 2010 to $ 3.55 billion over the latest trailing - twelve months (TTM), free cash flow has been highly negative with a cumulative - $ 38.4 billion in losses over the same time frame.

Personally, I'm actually planning on raising my e-book prices soon, by taking my free novel off free — in part because I'm offering some of it free on Wattpad, so cash - strapped folks can get it there — and by lifting the price on at least some of my nonfiction, for which a «low» price suggests negative things about the quality thereof.

When it was rated [F], VZ had a one and three year free cash flow growth that was negative.

• One point is deducted when values are greater than 25 or if either cash flow or free cash flow is negative.

A free cash flow figure that is near 0 or negative indicates that the company may be having trouble generating the cash necessary to deliver on promised payments.

Even if you have negative equity in your car, selling it typically will result in reducing your monthly payment, freeing up cash that can be used to shore - up your finances.

You can take rates negative... you can make the return on cash negative... and you can eke out a bit more in the return spread between risk - free and risky assets... but eventually that spread gets bid tight and looks something like this:

Zero Hedge screened Russell 2000 companies finding 10 companies with negative enterprise value, and then further subdivided the screen into companies with negative, and positive free cash flow (defined here as EBITDA — Cap Ex).

Since then, Argo's assets under management have continued to decline, no significant fund realisations have been reported, fee receivables from three separate Argo - managed funds have been written - off, free cash flow has turned negative, additional shareholder funds have been invested in illiquid loans and investments, an emphasis of matter paragraph has been added to the most recent audit report, and the dividend has been eliminated.

Unfortunately, we still see negative operating free cash flow as the company continues to invest heavily in its platform (though it should turn positive on a FY basis)...

And cash flow provides no relief either — with Digicel's net cash from operations (& operating cash margin) declining each year, and cumulative free cash flow negative to the tune of $ (0.5) billion.

I mentioned that I pick stocks to short based on valuation, not ratios (I ask you to find the correct free cash flow — I bet most people don't kow they're working with negative net working capital, either).

Yr - end cash was $ 5.1 m, and let's assume free cashflow is unchanged vs. last year at $ 151 K. [Which should offer some upside — i) receivables (ex-AREO) & payables were a significant negative last year, ii) management fees should be up y - o - y, and iii) further cost savings & efficiencies were identified in the final results].