Not exact matches
The research also appears to solve one of the great unknowns of climate
sensitivity, the role of cloud formation and whether this will have a positive or
negative effect on
global warming.
(Orbital forcing doesn't have much of a
global annual average forcing, and it's even concievable that the
sensitivity to orbital forcing as measured in terms of
global averages and the long - term response (temporal scale of ice sheet response) might be approaching infinity or even be
negative (if more sunlight is directed onto an ice sheet, the
global average albedo might increase, but the ice sheet would be more likely to decay, with a
global average albedo feedback that causes warming).
Ultimately our paper shows that all three of the main conclusions in DK12 are faulty: the rate of OHC increase has not slowed in recent years, there is no evidence for «climate shifts» in
global heat content data, and the recent OHC data do not support the conclusion that the net climate feedback is
negative or that climate
sensitivity is low.
DK12 used ocean heat content (OHC) data for the upper 700 meters of oceans to draw three main conclusions: 1) that the rate of OHC increase has slowed in recent years (the very short timeframe of 2002 to 2008), 2) that this is evidence for periods of «climate shifts», and 3) that the recent OHC data indicate that the net climate feedback is
negative, which would mean that climate
sensitivity (the total amount of
global warming in response to a doubling of atmospheric CO2 levels, including feedbacks) is low.
He has published two papers stating that climate change is not serious: a 2001 paper hypothesizing that clouds would provide a
negative feedback to cancel out
global warming, and a 2009 paper claiming that climate
sensitivity (the amount of warming caused by a doubling of carbon dioxide) was very low.
But the regional effects can potentially contribute to a much lower
global sensitivity than people would expect if they intuitively assumed that
sensitivity (with «feedbacks») can't be
negative.
Some of them deny it is even warming, others claim anthropogenic
global warming (AGW) is a hoax, others claim that there is some magical
negative feedback that will result in virtually no warming, others like Lewis cherry pick literature to delude themselves into thinking that climate
sensitivity is low, while others are convinced that an ice age is imminent;)