Watch the first 1 to 2 minutes section
of the UP Stream Pt 4 doco / research prject specifically being directed at all Climate
Scientists about how important Values are, and why Listening to the community (the target market) is absolutely critical: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyRKTqsXfjM Watch how people (the general public) are treated by others (climate scientists included) on all climate blogs when they indicate they are not yet convinced of AGW or can't work out who to believe is telling the truth and in doing so reference someone else's «opinion»... and try and measure the level of paranoia exhibited by pro-agw folks about such negative comments about th
Scientists about how important Values are, and why Listening to the community (the target market) is absolutely critical: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyRKTqsXfjM Watch how people (the general public) are treated by others (climate
scientists included) on all climate blogs when they indicate they are not yet convinced of AGW or can't work out who to believe is telling the truth and in doing so reference someone else's «opinion»... and try and measure the level of paranoia exhibited by pro-agw folks about such negative comments about th
scientists included) on all climate blogs when they indicate they are not yet convinced
of AGW or can't work out who to believe is telling the truth and in doing so reference someone else's «
opinion»... and try and measure the level
of paranoia exhibited by pro-agw folks about such
negative comments about the science.
• Gore used
opinions of government
scientists whose work can not verified • The practice
of rainmaking is more art than a science • The practice
of stopping global warming is more politics than science • Making rain is local • Stopping warming is global • Rainmakers are positive blaming neither man nor nature for a lack
of rain • Warm stoppers are
negative blaming humanity for causing warming • Rainmakers do not get paid if they do not produce • Warm stoppers are paid to create alarm about warming
But painting this as the «normal»,
opinion - based sort
of consensus is a good denial tactic, as is highlighting the views
of the very few contrarian climate
scientists (who are in the same boat as the people who authored
negative trials on aspirin, if there are any - they're destined for the dustbin
of science history.)