Just a few mistakes can cost your book's reputation through
negative reader reviews.
Not exact matches
Too little is known about the rest of their formula, and given the large quantity of
negative reviews it is not possible for our experts to recommend that our
readers take Omega XL.
I really hate to give a
negative review, since I've only had positive experiences before this, but I must be honest with my
readers.
Honest
negative reviews can be incredibly helpful — to the
reader and the author.
When this happens, you might get jealous or even secretly hope that
readers will leave a bunch of
negative reviews.
In most circumstances,
readers will explain themselves when they leave a
negative comment or
review.
Authors (and sometimes
readers) might also intentionally post
negative reviews to drive people away from an author and toward the author of their choice.
I think most horror
readers remember Anne Rice's rather public meltdown on Amazon.com regarding
negative reviews of Blood Canticle [1].
You've undoubtedly seen the
negative reviews on Amazon.com discouraging
readers from purchasing a book because of writing mistakes and typos.
Avoid degrading or verbally abusing
readers who give your book bad
reviews or leave
negative comments — it's not worth the trouble, and may actually end up hurting you and your author brand since the public can see your responses.
If you don't get any
reviews, or some
negative reviews, your book probably has problems or isn't good enough — by «good» I mean, does it satisfy
readers of that genre, or not?
It's far better to get critique from a few beta
readers than to receive
negative reviews on Amazon.
Under Amazon's terms of service there is no obligation at all by the
reader to leave a
review, positive or
negative.
And that is the point that I hopefully made in the article, that there are authors who not only rant but who enlist their legions of
readers to counterattack a
negative review.
The problem is, a lot of the right
readers may just skim the Amazon page and see that a
negative, 3 star
review has been voted «most helpful» and assume incorrectly that the book must not be any good.
Besides, trust your
readers enough to be able to tell a valid
review — one that actually read your book and put some consideration into the
review — from the ones who just like to troll indie books to give them
negative reviews.
If you think that's totally unfair, I agree: most
readers won't
review a book even if they liked it; and most
readers won't click to vote a book
review as «helpful» unless it's a
negative review.
But a minority of people (25, about of 150 in this case) clicked the «most helpful» button, leading to a
negative review on top, which is giving new
readers a false impression of the other
reader's reactions.
Although Amazon is on the right track, and of course you don't want fake or misleading book
reviews (because they lead to MORE
negative reviews from disappointed
readers), as a professional author you also need to do what you can to counteract Amazon's overzealous
review removal policies.
And if you believe in your writing, you can not let the
negative book
reviews kill your sales and dissuade potential
readers from taking a chance on your books.
The difference will be that you've removed the unfair impression that having a
negative review on top generates, that the majority of
readers did not like the book, even when the evidence (a four star average) clearly indicates that they did.
The feedback you'll get from your beta
readers will sting, but it's totally worth it because they are saving you from countless
negative reviews on Amazon.
But if real
readers do like your books, then you have an obligation to keep getting your book in front of more
readers who will like it, and possibly mitigating
negative reviews that aren't relevant to your ideal
readers as much as possible.
Done this way, I don't think I'll get
negative reviews: I explain I'm not doing it to take advantage of
readers; I'm doing it because I'm trying to find cheaper ways to get my books out to them.
The whole event was disappointing to us — that the writer took such a
negative stance for a little publicity, that the J.K. Rowling fans have followed her to that same
negative space, and that Amazon's
review system has been compromised for
readers wanting honest
reviews.
In fact you could argue getting up even higher could be bad, because right now I have visibility in my section, but if I get up to top 10 in the free kindle store I'm going to get lots of downloads from people who aren't normal
readers of my genre, which could lead to
negative reviews.
From rejection letters to
negative reviews, they realize after the fact that their books should have been fully edited and ultimately worthy of the hard - earned money that
readers will spend at the book store or on Amazon and Barnes & Noble.
We now have a whole community of
readers who hate all self - publishers and often write swarms of
negative reviews even if they haven't read the book.
Mixed and even
negative reviews can still qualify as recommendations if we anticipate
reader interest.
I think that most
readers on goodreads.com have wised up to this and I don't think that those kind of
negative reviews have much impact on whether a person decides to read a book or not.
As a result, I decided that it would be the last time I put in a
reader review that had the least whiff of
negative comment because I don't need those kinds of emails.
Some authors will say this is dishonest; but
negative reviews always get the most «helpful» votes and show up on the front page of Amazon, and that doesn't necessarily reflect the majority of
readers» reactions (out of 187
reviews, only 5 % of them are one star.
Negative reviews are a fact of life when you are dealing with the internet in general and
readers who are hiding behind anonymity.
Once you've finished writing your book, you'll also have to deal with rejection from literary agents and editors, as well as
negative reviews from
readers.
Even
negative reviews are important, since what one
reader didn't like about your book might be exactly what another
reader is looking for.
Print This Post Filed Under: REAL WORLD Tagged With:
negative reviews, pro tips,
reviews, separation of author and
reader
I have seen so many
negative reviews of books with
readers saying that the book is full of typos and grammatical errors and that the author has not proof read the document carefully.
For
readers, leaving
negative reviews could reflect more upon themselves than on an author or piece of writing.
I am proud to say that to my knowledge,
Readers» Favorite was the first company to not post
negative reviews.
You need the right cover — the one that converts the most viewers into buyers; the one that properly manages
reader expectation to prevent the
negative reviews that appear when the cover is attracting the wrong sort of people.
Negative reviews direct the wrong
readers (meaning
readers that won't like it anyway) away from a book, and that's as critical to success as finding the right
readers.
Of course, then, if you do get the cover of your dreams and still get
negative reviews, you'll know it's either because that
reader just didn't connect with your writing... or that you suck.
With so many
negative reviews, including from your website, who do you or your
readers recommend, other than Create Space?
• You don't tell reviewers what to say or how to rate your book • They're free to say whatever they want, including something
negative • Early
readers aren't your personal best friends • Don't post any fake
reviews by pretend people, or encourage anyone to do that for you
The problem is not «bad» or «good» in the sense of
negative or positive, but it looks like
reviews for Independent books in Kirkus are done by junior high
readers or trainees at best
It shows respect for your
reader and it should also completely eliminate any future
negative reviews regarding writing style.
As a
reader, I pay no attention to positive online
reviews (I do scan the
negative ones, I admit), but I have bought several books via one of the «bargain e-books» newsletters I subscribe to (BookBub).
Readers, who supply
reviews whether
negative or positive, invested their time reading one of my books.
I have a goal of commenting in a positive manner on each and every
review a
reader leaves on Amazon about one of my books, whether their comments are
negative o
If your book is riddled with typos,
readers will point this out in
negative reviews and your sales may suffer as a result.