Again, the point is that this suggests a low or
negative return on investment for expensive second - tier private colleges, regardless of who pays, or how.
Not exact matches
Investment return is not a part of the equation for determining negative net cash flow, so increasing or decreasing investment returns will not have an immediate, first - order effect on the calculation for negative net
Investment return is not a part of the equation
for determining
negative net cash flow, so increasing or decreasing
investment returns will not have an immediate, first - order effect on the calculation for negative net
investment returns will not have an immediate, first - order effect
on the calculation
for negative net cash flow.
I spent a couple of hundred bucks producing a trailer
for my first book, Northern Cross, 2 or 3 years ago... I think I got a
negative 98 %
return on that
investment.
One requirement of achieving the indicated
returns is that you increase your
investment on each
negative EV stock
for every month the stock remains at
negative EV.
Investors sitting idly by
on the sidelines watching everyone else make 70 - 100 % since the March lows are resolved to the fact that risk - free
investment returns are going to be
negative in terms of even modest inflation
for years to come.
Forecasting what may most likely happen with these factors over time (given the assumed fluctuations in the markets - which you can control every year by using different rates of
return on every
investment for every year - including
negative rates of
return, and being able to change your income goal every year) is much more important to model, than a one - dimensional probability number, to an actual investor's life.
With most every other code - driven retirement planner, you can't even do simple things like have your spouse retire a year later than you, run a side biz, work part - time, have a
negative rate of
return on an
investment account
for just one - year, or just about any of the hundreds of things that actually happen in the Real World.
Investors clearly understand that higher fees can have a
negative impact
on their net
return, as is evident in the price war in mutual fund fees, but a few basis - points difference in visible fees is far less meaningful in performance impact than the often - large hidden costs.14
For example, switching from a low - turnover strategy to a sloppily constructed strategy that spends scores of basis points in incremental trading costs can cost the investor dearly in performance.15 The same holds true for the buyers of opaque high - fee products (hedge funds and illiquid private investments), for which substantial costs may be hidden from sig
For example, switching from a low - turnover strategy to a sloppily constructed strategy that spends scores of basis points in incremental trading costs can cost the investor dearly in performance.15 The same holds true
for the buyers of opaque high - fee products (hedge funds and illiquid private investments), for which substantial costs may be hidden from sig
for the buyers of opaque high - fee products (hedge funds and illiquid private
investments),
for which substantial costs may be hidden from sig
for which substantial costs may be hidden from sight.
Xbox has eaten that subsidy
for 2 generations with nothing to show
for it except
for an online community that prides itself shouting at everybody in earshot racial slurs like they were breathing air and a
negative return on investment.
The economic argument is not a climate science issue, it is a resulting issue, a policy issue, combined with a slew of other issues such as peak oil and industry gone wild that long term has
negative return on investment written all over it, due to short term thinking inconsiderate of the ramifications of egregious exploitation of the earths resources
for the benefit of a few at the cost of many.