Following many recent events over games that have changed over time, or where a developer has voiced an unpopular opinion, users have been able to post
negative reviews of a game.
What is truly shameful, however, is that Eidos the publisher had Jeff Gerstmann of Gamespot fired for writing
a negative review of the game.
I looked at some of
the negative reviews of this game and thought, no don't listen so bought it, great game great graphics storyline very good, plenty to do in this game morphs to find, no time to be bored a very entertaining game definitely worth a buy.
Not exact matches
I was on this forum yesterday reading the article that
reviewed the Chelsea
game and while the
review was balanced as I expected, I could not believe how
negative and despondent some
of our own fan's responses were.
What was the most memorable
negative review, or coverage,
of a Nintendo specific
game, or format that lead to the formation
of Nintendo Enthusiast in 2011?
I still read
reviews even before buying cheap
games; some the
negative comments I found here almost stopped me from buying it, but I thought «on the otherhand, its so cheap, the risk
of it sucking royally is not an issue.»
Well, I cant understand for the life
of me why this
game has had so many
negative reviews!
I would ask that anyone who comes to the
review section
of this
game to notice that there are MANY positive
reviews, MANY
negative reviews,
All the
negatives this
game get in other
reviews is just because it does not is the «hash n» slash» type
of RPG.
They are ranked according to the exact same methodology we used to rank the larger publishers above, earning points for average Metascore, %
of releases that earn positive or
negative reviews, and the total number
of great
games.
- I also guarantee at the time
of writing this that the majority
of severely
negative reviews from users are people who haven't actually played the
game at all.
this
game is awesome, much funnier than monopoly, I'd say most
of the
negative reviews are from people who didn't bother getting too deep into
Most
of the
negative reviews come from fantards complaining about how its not like the rest
of teh paper mario series like its the main **** franchise and «worst
game of all time»?
Still, many
of the
game's most recent
reviews are
negative, almost all
of them cite DRM and the internet connection requirement one way or another.
Reviews were
negative, and the idea
of video
game adaptations quickly dropped.
While Sonic Mania currently has a «Mostly Positive» user rating in Steam, many
negative reviews have been flooding with the knowledge
of the
game's DRM spreading around.
Oddly, we saw a similar upward trend with Steam's most popular multiplayer survival
game, ARK: Survival Evolved, where despite mostly
negative reviews, the
game's playerbase increased by 23 % over the course
of just one month back in September.
Sometimes I see people share
negative reviews of Steam
games that have massive playtimes on them.
Although the franchise was largely a financial success and the first movie is often considered one
of the better examples
of a video
game - to - movie adaptation, the Resident Evil franchise attracted mostly
negative reviews throughout its six - film run.
It seems I dedicated a lot
of page space in this
review talking about the
negative aspects
of Burnout Paradise, which is rather disingenuous as ultimately these complaints had very little impact on the overall excellent experience I had with this
game because everything else about Burnout Paradise Remastered is so darn good.
In my Super Mario Maker
review, one
of the things I mentioned as a
negative aspect
of the
game is that some iconic Mario features are missing from the
game.
; Poisoned Newspaper Editor; Video
Game Company Sues 14 - year - Old;
Negative Review of Amazon's «Key» Service...
They will consult with you to come up with a «
game plan» and timeline for posting product
reviews that highlight the best aspects
of your products or services and that assist in mitigating any
negative reviews out there.
The final
negative I'd like to raise before finishing this
review is that the
game's perception
of damage can sometimes be strange.
In a clear victory for quality control Warner Bros., a publisher who has become well disliked among the gaming community for their attitude toward customers, has pulled Batman: Arkham Knight from Steam following a barrage
of negative reviews destroying the
game for its horrendous performance and slew
of -LSB-...]
In the past week, company
review website Glassdoor.com has seen an increase in
negative reviews from former employees
of the Polish
game development company CD Projekt Red, many
of whom reference poor management, long working days, and «fake goals.»
A majority
of the user
reviews on the digital distribution platform for the
game are
negative (1316 as compared to 907 positive
reviews), and it looks like nobody is cool with the lack
of optimization and the lack
of content that the
game has.
How one bit
of negative information in a
game review or forum post can color our entire perception
of a
game.
«Starting today, each
game page now contains a histogram
of the positive to
negative ratio
of reviews over the entire lifetime
of the
game, and by clicking on any part
of the histogram you're able to read a sample
of the
reviews from that time period,» explains Steam UI designer, Alden Kroll.
In a clear victory for quality control Warner Bros., a publisher who has become well disliked among the gaming community for their attitude toward customers, has pulled Batman: Arkham Knight from Steam following a barrage
of negative reviews destroying the
game for its horrendous performance and slew
of missing graphical features, all
of which seems to stem from the PC version being developed by external company Iron Galaxy Studios.
Most
of the
negative reviews of Part 1 complained the
game was short, which perhaps it is if you nail straight forwards ignoring everything and everyone to meet.
During the writing
of this
review Codemaster's actually changed the
game's Steam description after a torrent
of negative reviews from customers who felt cheated, pointing out that while it was never said directly everything on the Steam page was worded to make potential customers think it was a HD remake
of the original CMR 2.0, rather than a port
of a mobile
game that was only loosely based upon the Colin McRae series.
How can you call this video a fair honest
review of the console when 90 percent
of their gripes were about the UI, no real mention
of games, exclusives, controller, bundles, pricing, online service, etc.... they spcifically pointed out as many
negatives as they could.
every week and you moderate me with a legit
negative review of a bad
game?
They are ranked according to the exact same methodology we used to rank the larger publishers above, earning points for average Metascore, %
of releases that earn positive or
negative reviews, and the total number
of great
games.
However, during the free weekend, a massive amount
of players who didn't meet the minimum system requirements would leave
negative reviews, simply because they couldn't run the
game.
Bloober Team quickly responded to the
negative reviews with a letter to players
of the
game.
So you can try out the
game for yourself and see if it sticks with you; considering the most recent
negative reviews on the
game have largely concerned the lack
of players, it certainly can't hurt matters.
The developer last month announced it's plan to sue 100 Steam users for leaving
negative reviews on the company's
games, to the tune
of $ 18 million pounds.
It is something I enjoy doing and whenever I
review a
game I always try to find more positives than
negatives about the
game I am currently
reviewing, sometimes it is easier than other but I usually manage to find something entertaining with every
game I
review, but Beyond is so depressing, and so frustrating sometimes I just felt the need to be done with it, I just wanted it to be over, and if I had bought it then chances are I would never have finished it simply because
of my personal taste and my personal taste do not like quick - time events, depressing story lines, and motion controls.
Sometimes I see people share
negative reviews of Steam
games that have massive playtimes on them.
These graphs show the amount
of reviews that a
game has received both positive and
negative.
I suspect a lot
of my criticisms are to do with having no money invested in the
game, and when
reviewing it's often easier to be
negative than positive.
The
game ended up with a relatively low 60 rating on Metacritic, not to mention plenty
of negative consumer
reviews.
And, if you've been following the news as
of late, it seems that those
reviews were compromised by WB Games... sort
of a «don't talk
negative about our
game and we'll give you a digital code» sort
of deal.
Good
review as I'm still unsure as to whether this
game is worth # 15 after a lot
of negative feedback I've heard from it.
H1Z1 was released in January 2015 through Steam's early access and the
game has received mixed
reviews, with most
negative comments being directed towards technical issues and the limited features and size
of the
game.
As the majority
of critics will never have played an Uncharted
game in their life, their
reviews will undoubtedly be coloured by their memories
of the good Dr. Jones (the closest cinematic analogue) which, combined with the almost universally
negative perception
of video
game movie adaptations that already exists, could severely limit the film's box office success.
Although, in retrospect, most
of the
negative reviews of Sonic
games here on GR were written by * leafs through documents *....
So, technically, the
reviews are mixed overall, but the fact that many
of the
negative complaints consist
of people saying they can't even play the
game is cause for concern.