Sentences with phrase «negative social costs»

Governments should explore the appropriate levy and / or penalties to place on these technology companies, and what types of activities to finance to remediate negative social costs.

Any company that has reached such scale produces some form of pollution or other negative social costs.

So you accept as axiomatic that anthropogenic CO2 controls the TOE, that a warmer earth imposes positive social costs (is bad), and that a cooler earth bestows negative social costs (is good)?

However, most instruments have best practice applications that have achieved CO2 reductions at low or negative social costs, signalling that a broad portfolio of tools is available to governments to cut building ‐ related emissions cost ‐ effectively.

Not exact matches

The negative external effects (diseconomies, social costs) do not preoccupy them excessively.

All the remaining factors were negative with energy costs, employers» additional social costs (on top of wages) and the regulatory climate being the most negative.

Most blatantly, it did not quantify benefits, and — despite extensive discussion of administrative costs — ignores the broader potential negative impacts or social costs.

Second, the damage cost of a ton of CO2 (at 3 % discount rate) ranges from negative to $ 22 at the 99 percentile [from Richard Tol's paper «The Social Cost of Carbon: Trends, Outliers and Catastrophes»], with a median of about cost of a ton of CO2 (at 3 % discount rate) ranges from negative to $ 22 at the 99 percentile [from Richard Tol's paper «The Social Cost of Carbon: Trends, Outliers and Catastrophes»], with a median of about Cost of Carbon: Trends, Outliers and Catastrophes»], with a median of about $ 4.

The negative effects were not simply monetary, there were cultural losses and non-economic costs, in terms of time investment, social - cohesion and livelihood security, were also widespread.

The «social cost of carbon,» aka CO2, is negative.

In fact, under some very reasonable assumptions, the social cost of carbon can even be negative, suggesting some benefits of carbon dioxide emissions.

The findings suggest the predictors have either positive or negative effect on the social cost of carbon emissions.

Probably right for some duration to come — the [sic] «social cost of carbon» is assessed to currently be negative.

Costs are defined in a variety of ways and under a variety of assumptions that affect their value ► Cost types include: ► administrative costs of planning, management, monitoring, audits, accounting, reporting, clerical activities, etc. associated with a project or program; ► damage costs to ecosystems, economies and people due to negative effects from climate change; ► implementation costs of changing existing rules and regulation, capacity building efforts, information, training and education, etc. to put a policy into place; ► private costs are carried by individuals, companies or other private entities that undertake the action, where ► social costs include additionally the external costs on the environment and on society as a wCosts are defined in a variety of ways and under a variety of assumptions that affect their value ► Cost types include: ► administrative costs of planning, management, monitoring, audits, accounting, reporting, clerical activities, etc. associated with a project or program; ► damage costs to ecosystems, economies and people due to negative effects from climate change; ► implementation costs of changing existing rules and regulation, capacity building efforts, information, training and education, etc. to put a policy into place; ► private costs are carried by individuals, companies or other private entities that undertake the action, where ► social costs include additionally the external costs on the environment and on society as a wcosts of planning, management, monitoring, audits, accounting, reporting, clerical activities, etc. associated with a project or program; ► damage costs to ecosystems, economies and people due to negative effects from climate change; ► implementation costs of changing existing rules and regulation, capacity building efforts, information, training and education, etc. to put a policy into place; ► private costs are carried by individuals, companies or other private entities that undertake the action, where ► social costs include additionally the external costs on the environment and on society as a wcosts to ecosystems, economies and people due to negative effects from climate change; ► implementation costs of changing existing rules and regulation, capacity building efforts, information, training and education, etc. to put a policy into place; ► private costs are carried by individuals, companies or other private entities that undertake the action, where ► social costs include additionally the external costs on the environment and on society as a wcosts of changing existing rules and regulation, capacity building efforts, information, training and education, etc. to put a policy into place; ► private costs are carried by individuals, companies or other private entities that undertake the action, where ► social costs include additionally the external costs on the environment and on society as a wcosts are carried by individuals, companies or other private entities that undertake the action, where ► social costs include additionally the external costs on the environment and on society as a wcosts include additionally the external costs on the environment and on society as a wcosts on the environment and on society as a whole.

Before shutting down modern civilization to control the «social costs» of CO2, insist that someone demonstrate that they are other than zero or negative (CO2 beneficial).

As a result, the Social Cost of Carbon is Negative since CO2 is so very critical to plant growth and therefore human life.

A 2016 memo from a Facebook Inc executive made the case for the company's grow - at - all - costs culture, explaining that the negative consequences of the social network — even deaths and terrorist attacks — weren't reason to abandon its purpose of connecting people to one another.

Unfortunately, what holds women back is the «social cost» of negotiating — or the negative social impact that negotiation is perceived to have on women.

Women who negotiate often suffer negative consequences, a phenomenon that researchers call «social cost.»

PAR models are also consistent with broader life history theory (Charnov, 1993) in suggesting that enhanced pro-inflammatory tendencies in young adulthood may be triggered by adverse social circumstances during childhood even if such adjustments carry with them the cost of longer - term negative health implications (cf. Belsky et al., 1991; Gibbons et al., 2012).

PTSD is a severe psychiatric illness characterised by four core symptom clusters: re-experiencing, avoidance, negative cognition and mood and hyperarousal.1 With an estimated lifetime prevalence in community samples of up to 8 %, PTSD results in a great deal of personal suffering and escalating social and economic costs.2 Unfortunately, current evidence - based treatments for PTSD leave a high percentage with a significant symptom burden, highlighting the urgent need for novel treatments.

Adolescent emotional and behavioural problems result in great personal, social and monetary cost.1, 2 The most serious, costly and widespread adolescent problems — suicide, delinquency, violent behaviours and unintended pregnancy — are potentially preventable.3 In addition to high - risk behaviours, such as the use of alcohol, tobacco and other drugs; parents of adolescents also express concerns in everyday parenting issues, such as fighting with siblings, talking back to adults and not doing school work.4 These parental concerns are often perceived as normative during adolescence and the impact on family dynamics, such as parental stress and negative parent — adolescent relationships, is often undermined.