The improvement in return results from the skewness premium received by the option writer in exchange for assuming large
negative tail risk, which is a function of the preference - for - lottery hypothesis, likely a foundation of the low - volatility anomaly.
Not exact matches
As I've regularly noted in recent months, our immediate outlook is essentially flat neutral for practical purposes, though we're partial to a layer of
tail -
risk hedges, such as out - of - the - money index put options, given that a market decline on the order of even 5 % would almost certainly be sufficient to send our measures of market internals into a
negative condition.
The main purpose behind holding these options is hedging a portfolio against significant
negative movement in the value of US equities, commonly referred to as
tail risk.
Most asset classes display
negative skew and fat
tails, which also makes volatility problematic as a
risk measure.
Plan sponsors have tended to manage
risk traditionally, Leydon says, avoiding potential
negative outcomes by focusing on
tail risk.
Moreover, it helps to manage
risk more effectively by protecting against infrequent or unlikely but consequential
negative events, often referred to as «
tail risks.»