Sentences with phrase «negligence was part of their actions»

Not exact matches

The Contractor indemnifies the Government and the vessel and its owners against all claims, demands, or causes of action to which the Government, the vessel or its owner (s) might be subject as a result of damage or injury (including death) to the property or person of anyone other than the Government or its employees, or the vessel or its owner, arising in whole or in part from the negligence or other wrongful act of the Contractor, or its agents or employees, or any subcontractor, or its agents or employees.

More than negligence on the part of the defendant must usually be proved in order to recover damages in such an action, however.

If the single vehicle accident is the result of negligence by an auto or auto part manufacturer, it is vital that fast action is taken to preserve the evidence.

Negligence on the part of park owners and managers may account for all of the above, so that an action in negligence may be brought against all individuals and entities involved for injuries resulting from that nNegligence on the part of park owners and managers may account for all of the above, so that an action in negligence may be brought against all individuals and entities involved for injuries resulting from that nnegligence may be brought against all individuals and entities involved for injuries resulting from that negligencenegligence.

However, he found that the report contained: «A wealth of relevant and potentially important evidence which bears directly or indirectly on the issues in this action, including the central issue of whether Mr Rogers» death was caused by negligence on the part of Mr Hoyle.»

Certain steps that were taken in the action led the trial judge to conclude that defence counsel had a proper basis for alleging negligence on the part of the third party and the trial judge accepted that the third party, or her counsel, had employed tactics amounting to an attempt to make an end run around the defendant.

Such actions are generally brought under a strict liability theory, which requires no showing of negligence on the part of a manufacturer or distributor.

The Act states that «it is not a defense that the death was caused in whole or in part by the contributory negligence of one or more of the beneficiaries on behalf of whom the action is brought, but the amount of damages given shall be reduced...» 740 ILCS 180/2 (g).

One of the alterations to the pre-existing rule is its limitation, in s 260, to causes of action that arise from an actual or proposed act or omission involving negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust on the part of a director.

Your neighbor's liability won't cover your damages because his actions are intentional and criminal, and in no way stem from negligence on the part of their insured.