Sentences with phrase «negligent act does»

One negligent act doesn't have to cause problems for many other people.

It provides protection for both personal property and liability, and ensures that one person's negligent act doesn't affect the entire community.

By having renters insurance, you make sure that one negligent act doesn't result in someone suing you for all of those things.

Not exact matches

There is no real way to get anything done about midwives acting in negligent ways.

You're not responsible for the building other than through your negligent acts, so you don't need that part.

Since liability coverage extends to your children as well as yourself, and the acts of children under thirteen are presumed to be negligent (and therefore covered) even if they were intentional, you don't have to pay for the defense costs or for the settlement — your policy would take care of both in a situation like that.

You're on your own if someone sues you for a negligent act and you don't have renters insurance!

However, Mulcoy Travel does not accept any liability of whatever nature for the acts, omissions or defaults, whether negligent or otherwise, of Las Palmeras Surf Camp, airlines or others providing services in connection with your holiday pursuant to a contract between themselves and yourself (which may be evidenced in writing by the issue of a reservation, ticket, voucher, coupon or the Iike) and over whom Mulcoy Travel has no direct or exclusive control.

The Court believed that the situation fell within the pre-existing class of duties which entailed liability if «a public authority... negligent [ly] fail [ed] to act in accordance with an established policy where it is reasonably foreseeable that failure to do so will cause physical harm to the plaintiff.»

As will be discussed in more detail below, this can occur in cases where it is impossible to determine which of a number of negligent acts by multiple actors in fact caused the injury, but it is established that one or more of them did in fact cause it.

Whether a driver is distracted, texting or talking on a cell phone, speeding, or driving the wrong direction, a pedestrian does not stand much of a chance of a driver is acting in a negligent manner and ignoring the safety of others in the area.

After doing so, the court found that there was no negligent act on the part of any school employee that resulted in the plaintiff's injuries.

Did your loved one suffer fatal injuries as a result of someone's negligent acts?

It doesn't negate their liability when they have acted in a negligent manner.

While avoidable birth injuries typically do not result from a healthcare provider's intentional act, they can occur when a medical professional is careless, or negligent, during the birth process.

To collect damages for wrongful death, plaintiffs must prove that a negligent act or an act with intent to do harm to the victim caused the death.

The coverage does this by treating a «dishonest, fraudulent, criminal or malicious» act of either the insured or of others for whose actions the insured might be liable (for example, under the doctrine of vicarious liability) as an «error, omission or negligent act» as described in the policy.

If you believe mistakes were made due to the negligent or incompetent act by a medical professional or other healthcare provider, don't wait — call our expert Orange Park medical malpractice lawyers at 904-251-1111 or contact us online for your free, no - obligation consultation.

If you were injured due to the negligent acts of another, then the first thing you must do is to seek medical attention.

If a doctor acts in a negligent manner when trying to help a patient it can be medical malpractice if a doctor does not take appropriate medical action then this also can constitute as medical malpractice.

This can occur in cases where it is impossible to determine which of a number of negligent acts by multiple actors caused the injury, but it is established that one or more of them did in fact cause it.

The farm denied legal responsibility for the woman's death, arguing that the negligent acts of the other driver and the decedent herself were intervening causes that prevented the farm from being liable for the death, even if a jury did find that the farm had negligently allowed the calf to escape.

A lot of other states simply call it vicarious liability, but the important thing is if that's what you're trying to show, that a company or employer should be responsible for the negligence of their employees, you need to be able to show that the person who was negligent, the employee, was acting for the most part in furtherance of their employer's interests, doing the job they were hired to do.

The rightful owner might unsuccessfully try to sue you for reading their property, but reading does not cause damage, and your act is innocent (not even negligent), and not wrongful.

A truck driver may be considered negligent if they did not act carefully to prevent your injuries while they were behind the wheel.

Claims for losses caused by a negligent act can be brought under contact law or tout, a professional's duty to their client does not necessarily end just because the business entity ceases to exist.

When does limitation begin to run for negligent acts in cases involving tax, and how have the rules of the Limitation Act 1980 been interpreted?

This «exclusivity» rule discussed above does not apply where injury or death results from the negligent act or omission of someone, or something, other than your employer.

This protection does not apply, however, in cases where the victim was a child younger than 6 years of age, or if the attack was proximately caused by a negligent act or omission on the part of the dog owner.

There are times when a negligent act occurred but the injured person does not know the physician caused a problem.

In such actions against a professional, the plaintiff must file an affidavit of an expert witness which specifies at least one negligent act or omission and the factual bases for each claim, unless the basis of the claim does not require specialized knowledge or experience to evaluate the conduct of the defendant.

Yellow lights, also called amber lights, do not mean â $ œslow down.â $ According to section 44 of the Highway Traffic Act, it explains when approaching a  yellow light â $ œone must stop if you can do so safely; otherwise, go with caution.â $ The Fault Determination rules in the Insurance Act make it clear that if you are hit while going through a yellow light, you are found to be negligent and at fault for the accident.

Although as Andrew Smith J found, solicitors will not be found to have been negligent if their advice steps outside a permissible range, once they do, the client will be in a position to claim substantial damages if it can prove on the balance of probabilities that it would have acted differently had it received advice within the permissible range.

What, then, the culpable actor has done by his initial negligent act is, first, to have set in motion a dangerous force which embraces the injured person within the scope of its probable mischief; and next, in conjunction with circumstances which he must be held to contemplate, to have made more difficult if not impossible the means of proving the possible damaging results of his own act or the similar results of the act of another.

As noted by Andrew Smith J, the authorities did not clearly establish the correct test of causation where a lawyer is negligent in forming his opinion upon legal or other questions in order to advise or to act for his client.

There the court was not concerned with deciding what conduct to attribute to the defendant instead of her negligent act: she should obviously have attended instead of negligently failing to do so.

The authorities did not clearly establish the correct test of causation where a lawyer was negligent in forming his opinion upon legal or other questions in order to advise or to act for his client.

Sometimes, patients or their families often do not become aware that the injury and accompanying losses were caused by negligent acts or omissions of the doctor (s) or other health care providers for quite some time.

Since liability coverage extends to your children as well as yourself, and the acts of children under thirteen are presumed to be negligent (and therefore covered) even if they were intentional, you don't have to pay for the defense costs or for the settlement — your policy would take care of both in a situation like that.

Texas renters insurance liability coverage makes sure that you're able to cover your renter's legal liability in Texas and make good on the damage that was done to someone else as a result of your accidental, negligent act.

You're not responsible for the building other than through your negligent acts, so you don't need that part.

Although insurance covers negligent acts that may result in criminal fines, insurance does not cover intentional criminal acts.

You're on your own if someone sues you for a negligent act and you don't have renters insurance!

Sure, you don't want to imagine anything bad happening to what you own, but the reality is that acts of God and vandalism, theft, and negligent acts occur all the time.

If an employer's actions do not meet this standard of care, then the acts could be considered negligent, and any damages resulting may be claimed in a lawsuit for negligence.