Sentences with phrase «negligent operation of their vehicles»

Negligent operation of a vehicle results in financial liability for any action an impaired driver takes after entering the car.

It is enough for the state to prove that a defendant caused the death of another person through reckless or negligent operation of a vehicle.

Depending on the facts of your case, you may be entitled to monetary damages due to the other driver's negligent operation of their vehicle.

By placing legal responsibility on them for any loss caused to others by the negligent operation of the vehicle on a highway.

If you allow another person to take possession of your motor vehicle you will be held liable for any damages caused by the negligent operation of the vehicle.

Car owners are liable under the Highway Traffic Act for the negligent operation of their vehicles by others.

Not exact matches

Defined simply, a person is guilty of vehicular manslaughter when he or she causes the death of another person through the negligent or reckless operation of a motor vehicle.

If a bus driver is negligent in the operation of the vehicle, he or she may be held financially responsible for any damages that result.

The purpose behind these laws are to provide any person harmed as the result of the negligent operation of a motor vehicle with an adequate amount of coverage so that the injured party can seek proper health care and other services in an effort to make them whole again.

«Governmental agencies shall be liable for bodily injury and property damage resulting from the negligent operation by any officer, agent, or employee of the governmental agency, of a motor vehicle of which the governmental agency is owner

That conduct is simply whether they were operating the vehicle safely and following the motor vehicle highway laws, and whether that driver was negligent in the operation of the vehicle.

Such incidents, however, still carry legal liability and civil penalties if the driver was negligent or irresponsible in the operation or use of their vehicle.

The plaintiff sued the defendant claiming that the defendant had been negligent in his operation of his motor vehicle.

Co., the Court created a common law theory of liability of a social host «to a person injured by an intoxicated guest's negligent operation of a motor vehicle where a social host who knew or should have known that his guest was drunk, nevertheless gave him or permitted him to take an alcoholic drink and thereafter, because of his intoxication, the guest negligently operated a motor vehicle causing the third person's injury.»

In accidents involving a motorist and a non-motorist, s. 186 of the TSA imposes a statutory burden of proof, requiring motorists to prove the accident did not «entirely or solely arise» because of negligent operation of a motor vehicle — a «reverse onus» or rebuttable presumption.

«(a) The licensing authority in the home state, for the purposes of suspension, revocation or limitation of the license to operate a motor vehicle, shall give the same effect to the conduct reported, pursuant to article III of this compact, as it would if such conduct had occurred in the home state, in the case of conviction for: (1) Manslaughter or negligent homicide resulting from the operation of a motor vehicle; (2) Driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or a narcotic drug, or under the influence of any other drug to a degree which renders the driver incapable of safely driving a motor vehicle; (3) Any felony in the commission of which a motor vehicle is used; (4) Failure to stop and render aid in the event of a motor vehicle accident resulting in the death or personal injury of another.»