Sentences with phrase «negligent training»

This expertise includes handling cases alleging constitutional violations and police misconduct such as excessive force and unlawful arrest claims as well as state claims of negligent training, investigation and malicious prosecution.
Our experienced train accident lawyers can help you seek justice and hold negligent train operators accountable.
Bader Farms Inc. may bring counts of failure to warn, negligent design and marketing, and negligent training against BASF for alleged crop damage
Contact Los Angeles Metrolink accident attorney Joshua W. Glotzer today to learn more about how you can hold negligent train operators and service providers responsible for the harm you have suffered.
Following the accident, the plaintiff then brought suit against DLN Enterprises, Inc. («DLN»), which owns the Tavern, and Richard Smith, the sole shareholder of DLN, alleging claims under Georgia's Dram Shop law, O.C.G.A. § 51-1-40, as well as negligent training and supervision claims.
Metrolink accident victims may be entitled to recover compensation from negligent train operators the transportation companies.
Georgia Court of Appeals Affirms Dismissal in Auto Shop Negligent Training Case, Atlanta Injury Attorney Blog, published December 28, 2016
These can be the most devastating of train wrecks, and often involve negligent train conductors and poor railroad or crossing arm maintenance.
These dogs have often come from very stressful homes, and you need to examine how you are going to address the aftereffects of someone else's negligent training and handling of that dog.
The firm frequently handles claims of negligent supervision, negligent hiring, negligent retention, negligent training, breach of contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation and assault and battery.
We also defend employers against claims of employment discrimination, sexual harassment, wrongful discharge, negligent hiring, negligent retention, negligent training and employer defamation.
Defended a Department of Transportation safety and compliance consulting company against claims related to the negligent training of a client's independent contractor driver.
Although Georgia law allows for piercing the corporate veil when the shareholder directly participated in the the commission of the tort at issue, the court found this rule inapplicable to negligent training and supervision claims because such negligent conduct does not constitute direct participation in the commission of the tort.
The plaintiff opposed summary judgment, arguing that the facts underlying her negligent training and supervision claims provided a basis for piercing the corporate veil.
First, the Court of Appeals summarily rejected the plaintiff's argument that her negligent training and supervision claims provided a basis for piercing the corporate veil.
As far as the claims against the pizza franchise, the plaintiff alleged negligence under the doctrine of respondeat superior (Latin for, «let the master answer») and also direct negligence for negligent hiring, negligent training, and negligent supervision.
Negligent Training / Supervision: Lastly, New Mexico allows claims under the theory of negligent training and supervision.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z