It's to use the expense and complexity of it as leverage in
negotiations over climate legislation.
Not exact matches
Thus, now free of the procedural morass that characterised UNFCCC
negotiations in 2012, the ADP process that unfolds
over the next three years represent what may be seen as a contingent moment in the history of the UN
climate negotiating process, where fundamental questions
over the design and scope of an international agreement are up for grabs in a way and manner perhaps unseen since the beginning of the initial intergovernmental
negotiations at the end of the 1980s.
As Matthew Hoffmann has argued [2], the ozone
negotiations marked a normative shift
over the desirability of universal participation in global environmental
negotiations, a shift that was locked into the initial
negotiations on
climate change.
The success of the ozone
negotiations, in other words, has cast a deep and long shadow
over the path that the
climate negotiations have taken, one that has proven incredibly difficult to unravel.
Over the past decade, the
climate negotiations have seen repeated attempts to shift the emphasis of discussions to non-universal settings — the George W. Bush - initiated Major Economies Meeting being a key example.
As we approach the global
climate negotiations in Paris in just
over a week, actions by state governments like New York State provide essential momentum toward a strong and effective agreement.»
It's a shift, analysts say, that peaked after Copenhagen but in reality has steadily evolved
over the past two decades of frustrating
climate negotiations.
Following up on discussions in the regular
negotiations, the accord would establish a start - up fund of roughly US$ 30 billion
over the next three years to help developing countries prepare for a warmer
climate, integrate new technologies into sustainable development plans and protect their forests.
They see Noh - Bec as a perfect candidate for a carbon - reduction scheme developed
over the past decade of
climate negotiations.
The fast growing sources dropped out of the
climate change accord
over the course of
negotiations
unequal power in diplomatic
negotiations — resulting in
climate change discussions prioritising the needs of the developed North
over those of the global South.
President Obama's top
climate diplomat acknowledged today that Capitol Hill delays
over global warming legislation will likely push international
negotiations to work beyond a December summit in Copenhagen on a new treaty to succeed the Kyoto Protocol.
The repercussions of the findings, which were published Thursday in Science, could make it harder to hold warming to limits set during recent United Nations
climate negotiations — but they're being received cautiously by other
climate scientists, with questions raised
over the results of the analysis.
Over the weekend, I posted and alerted senior members of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change when an errant description of the panel's 2007 conclusion on the human climate influence found its way into an important draft document listing «elements of an outcome» for long - term action on climate — essentially a draft of what may emerge here when negotiations end on
Climate Change when an errant description of the panel's 2007 conclusion on the human
climate influence found its way into an important draft document listing «elements of an outcome» for long - term action on climate — essentially a draft of what may emerge here when negotiations end on
climate influence found its way into an important draft document listing «elements of an outcome» for long - term action on
climate — essentially a draft of what may emerge here when negotiations end on
climate — essentially a draft of what may emerge here when
negotiations end on Friday.
Over the next few days I'll post the reflections of a variety of observers of the climate treaty negotiations that concluded over the weekend in Cancún, Mex
Over the next few days I'll post the reflections of a variety of observers of the
climate treaty
negotiations that concluded
over the weekend in Cancún, Mex
over the weekend in Cancún, Mexico.
Long before
negotiations over strengthening an ailing
climate treaty concluded in Cancún, Mexico, with a muted, incremental agreement to keep on negotiating, it was clear that this wasn't going to be much of a news event.
Over the past two days I listened to a seemingly endless parade of national statements from all the world's countries about
climate change and the
negotiations going on here.
No one would argue that the current multi-lateral
climate negotiations are an attempt to establish «ultimate global authority
over humanity» and this is certainly never been suggested by the Planetary Boundaries research.
As I've said here before, it's inevitable that environmental lawyers engaged in the fight
over greenhouse gases will use whatever statutes they think help their case (and whatever public relations stunts, including dressing up as a bear at
climate negotiations).
Yvo de Boer, the executive secretary managing the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change, gave his latest update to the press today in Bali on negotiations over next steps under that faltering 1992 climate
Climate Change, gave his latest update to the press today in Bali on
negotiations over next steps under that faltering 1992
climate climate treaty.
For
over a decade, it has tried to sabotage international
climate change
negotiations and block agreements that would lead to greenhouse gas emissions reductions.
Is it possible to generalize
over what the rural poor would ask for from global
climate negotiations and what would this be?
Eisenhower initiated the
negotiations over the objections of Edward Teller (like Singer, Teller enjoyed a long life and inveighed against anthropogenic
climate change until he thought he could score on geoengineering — Singer is still enjoying - good for him).
They are also difficult because the multilateral
climate body — the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change — includes over 190 countries; these countries are grouped into various blocs with criss - crossing agendas and priorities; long - standing north - south resentments continue to rile the debate; and negotiations are governed by a consensus rule of procedure (bloody con
climate body — the UN Framework Convention on
Climate Change — includes over 190 countries; these countries are grouped into various blocs with criss - crossing agendas and priorities; long - standing north - south resentments continue to rile the debate; and negotiations are governed by a consensus rule of procedure (bloody con
Climate Change — includes
over 190 countries; these countries are grouped into various blocs with criss - crossing agendas and priorities; long - standing north - south resentments continue to rile the debate; and
negotiations are governed by a consensus rule of procedure (bloody consensus!
Don't expect the United Nations»
climate change conference currently underway in Lima, Peru, to deliver major headlines — the
negotiations are mostly
over technical and bureaucratic issues.
India was positive of a good outcome at the Paris 2015
climate change
negotiations which must yield an agreement to keep the global temperatures from rising
over two degrees Celsius, Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar said Saturday.
In truth, the intergovernmental body entrusted to prevent «dangerous» levels of
climate change has not only failed to make progress
over its twenty - odd years of work (and more than ninety official
negotiation meetings since the agreement was adopted), it has overseen a process of virtually uninterrupted backsliding.
My guess is there've been few lessons learned out of coverage of the international
climate treaty
negotiations and the domestic battle
over climate legislation.
When it was pointed out how radical it was to advocate binding caps on emissions given the history of the international
climate negotiations, Hu responded philosophically, in reference to his own experience in policy advocacy on various issues
over the years:
Over the past few years on this website you may have read many dispatches, reports, polemics, and laments from the prefabricated halls of various UN
climate change
negotiations.
Increase of credits from large hydro expected by 2020A new study released in time for the
climate negotiations in Durban confirms that
over 20 % of all carbon credits under the UN's offsetting scheme, the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), could come from business - as - usual large hydropower projects.
U.S.
climate action was on full display during COP23, with
over 100 prominent leaders from U.S. state and local governments, private sector and academia gathering in Bonn to voice support for the Paris Agreement and buoy confidence in the
negotiations.
This disagreement
over the future of the international
climate regime has been at the root of the repeated fights in the
climate negotiations over the last two years.
Many other leaders promised to attend, too, from the Marshall Islands (threatened with inundation) to the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change (hoping for a big wave to carry its negotiators to a successful treaty
negotiation over the next 15 months).
Two commentaries published
over the weekend said this is an «abstract» and «naive» approach that might hinder
climate negotiations.
[1] The Chairs of the ADP (Durban Platform for Action) handed
over negotiating documents to the French Presidency of the COP21
climate summit in Paris, formally closing the ADP
negotiations.
However, the scholarly literature offers differing views
over whether or not the outcomes of recent
negotiations strengthen or weaken the multilateral
climate regime.
Over the past week and a half youth have challenged Canada's irresponsible Canadian
negotiation strategies, indicative of the close relationship between Canada's
climate policy and dirty fossil fuels.
The ruckus
over restricted access to the Bella Centre — site of the UN
climate negotiations — continued this afternoon, as UN organizers continued to leave accredited conference delegates outside in the cold.
Given that for
over 20 years since international
climate change
negotiations began, the United States has refused to commit to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions based upon the justification that there is too much scientific uncertainty to warrant action, if it turns out that human - induced
climate change actually greatly harms the health and ecological systems on which life depends of others, should the United States be responsible for the harms that could have been avoided if preventative action had been taken earlier?
A similar transition is underway internationally, with bilateral and multilateral agreements among major emitters displacing efforts to make a grand bargain to cap global emissions at the United Nations, a shift proposed by a number of critics of the 20 - year effort to cap emissions, including the two of us,
over the last decade, that has only to begun to bear fruit since the collapse of international
climate negotiations at Copenhagen in 2009.
Although there has been a US press presence at international
climate negotiations since they began
over 20 years, the US media reports on the
climate negotiations has usually focused on the failures and small success of previous
negotiations.
Indeed, the feeling among parties outside the
negotiations was largely that the general shape of the deal is known and therefore the time for debates is
over and the time for serious
climate action has arrived.
The
climate conference in November offers an unique opportunity to stress the urgency of
climate action as it will be the first time a small island state is called upon to preside
over the
negotiations.
Frustration with the
climate talks has grown in the past two years but progress in this year's conference of the parties (COP) has seen
negotiations deadlocked in technical areas, and rich and poor countries at loggerheads
over compensation and money.
Friends of the Earth believes that UN
climate change
negotiations must expand its influence
over global economic and development policies to ensure that actions to mitigate and adapt to
climate change under the UNFCCC are not undermined.
Just months before Lima hosts
over 190 countries to advance international
climate negotiations at COP 20, Katoomba XX — Peru will identify opportunities for
climate policy and finance to align with other public and private investments and commitments to ensure that forests and other ecosystems continue to provide critical support for stable
climate and resilient -LSB-...]
Looking forward, things to watch include: the impact of economic recovery on commodity prices and agricultural expansion for food and biofuels production; large - scale land acquisition by foreign nations and corporations in tropical countries;
climate negotiations and the REDD mechanism, including controversies
over land rights, «offsetting», forest definitions, and sustainable forest management; the emergence of payments for ecosystem services beyond REDD; the cap - and - trade versus carbon tax schemes; efforts to address the demand side of deforestation — notably consumption; emerging certification systems for agricultural and forestry products (i.e. RSPO, Aliança da Terra, FSC, etc); and Brazil's progress in meeting its deforestation reduction targets.
Just months before Lima hosts
over 190 countries to advance international
climate negotiations at COP 20, Katoomba XX — Peru will identify opportunities for
climate policy and finance to align with other public and private investments and commitments to ensure that forests and other ecosystems continue to provide critical support for stable
climate and resilient societies.
As evidence of
climate change piles up and pessimism grows
over climate negotiations, discussion of geoengineering — deliberate large - scale intervention in Earth's natural systems — is rising up the agenda.