HBS began with Helping Babies Breathe neonatal resuscitation techniques that have been shown to reduce
neonatal mortality by up to 47 %.
egan with Helping Babies Breathe neonatal resuscitation techniques that have been shown to reduce
neonatal mortality by up to 47 %.
The authors concluded that health facility delivery is found to reduce the risk of
neonatal mortality by 29 % in low and middle income countries.
That's because countries like The Netherlands like to boost their international rankings in
neonatal mortality by pretending that premature babies born alive are stillbirths and not live births.
Not exact matches
«The highly charged debate over the safety of home birth was inflamed
by the publication of a meta - analysis
by Joseph R. Wax and coworkers, [1] which concluded that «less medical intervention during planned home birth is associated with a tripling of the
neonatal mortality rate.»
The third article
by Chang & Macones (2011), which the AAP uses to support their statement that
neonatal mortality is increased in out - of - hospital birth, was not as easily accessible.
CDC data shows that
neonatal mortality is about half as high with CNM and «other» midwives (there's no direct entry of homebirth category) as it is for MDs for all births, as well as
by weeks gestation.
That book is full of misinformation, for example he cites the Johnson & Daviss study saying «any remaing doubts about the safety of home birth were conclusively erased»
by said study — which isn't even remotely true (the home birth data from that study actually shows that
neonatal mortality is 3 TIMES higher at home):
Main outcome measure A composite primary outcome of perinatal
mortality and intrapartum related
neonatal morbidities (stillbirth after start of care in labour, early
neonatal death,
neonatal encephalopathy, meconium aspiration syndrome, brachial plexus injury, fractured humerus, or fractured clavicle) was used to compare outcomes
by planned place of birth at the start of care in labour (at home, freestanding midwifery units, alongside midwifery units, and obstetric units).
Some interesting charts: http://chartsbin.com/view/2501 percentages of births via c - section
by country http://chartsbin.com/view/2602 births attended
by skilled birth attendants
by country http://chartsbin.com/view/1451
neonatal mortality rate
by country
The following chart, adapted from Infant,
neonatal, and postneonatal deaths, percent of total deaths, and
mortality rates for the 15 leading causes of infant death
by race and sex: United States, 2007 makes that clear.
By the way, according to the World Health Organization, the correct statistic for international comparisons is perinatal
mortality (
neonatal mortality plus late stillbirths).
For example, the recently published Wax study that showed homebirth to have triple the
neonatal mortality rate of hospital birth was excoriated
by midwives and homebirth advocates for a variety of methodological flaws.
I was further intrigued
by some of the author's comments regarding
neonatal mortality rates of hospital vs home births.
However, they noted a smaller study of all planned home births attended
by midwives in British Columbia, Canada, from 2000 to 2004 that showed no increase in
neonatal mortality over planned hospital births attended
by midwives or physicians.
The Sustainable Development Goals include ensuring access
by infants to safe, nutritious, and sufficient food (2.1); ending all forms of malnutrition and achieving targets on stunting and wasting in children under 5 years of age (2.2); addressing the nutritional needs of lactating women (2.2); reducing
neonatal mortality (3.2); ensuring access to reproductive health - care services (3.7); and recognizing and valuing unpaid care provided
by women and girls (5.4).
These significantly increased risks of
neonatal mortality in home births must be disclosed
by all obstetric practitioners to all pregnant women who express an interest in such births.
Home - based
neonatal care
by community health workers for preventing
mortality in neonates in low - and middle - income countries: a systematic review.
HBS is suite of evidence - based hands - on training programs developed
by the AAP to reduce
neonatal mortality in resource - limited environments.
A study of 3,257 out - of - hospital births attended
by Arizona licensed midwives between 1978 - 85 shows a perinatal
mortality rate of 2.2 per 1,000 and a
neonatal mortality rate of 1.1 per 1,000 live births.
Initiation of breastfeeding within the first hour of birth is the primary and most vital step towards reducing infant and under - five
mortality,
by reducing the overwhelmingly high
neonatal mortality rate.»
Effect of early infant feeding practices on infection - specific
neonatal mortality: an investigation of the causal links with observational data from rural Ghana Karen M Edmond, Betty R Kirkwood, Seeba Amenga - Etego, Seth Owusu - Agyei, and Lisa S Hurt Beginning Breastfeeding From First Day of Life Reduces Infection Related Deaths in Newborns
by 2.6 times.
Also explore the interactive version of the visualization for the maternal
mortality ratio (MMR) in relation to GDP, education,
neonatal mortality, skilled birth attendance, and total fertility rate
by country (Global), 1980 - 2008.
The excess total
neonatal mortality for deliveries performed
by home midwives was 9.3 / 10,000 births or about 18 - 19 excess
neonatal deaths a year from midwife homebirths.
Based on the most recent 2012 births data, the authors concluded that if home births
by midwives continue to grow at the present 10 percent yearly rate, then the excess total
neonatal mortality of home births
by midwives would nearly double from about 16 - 17 in 2009 to about 32 in 2016.
A study of nearly 6 million low - risk births has found that the
neonatal mortality rate for delivery
by cesarean section is nearly three times the rate for vaginal delivery: 1.77 deaths per 1,000 live births via cesarean, as opposed to 0.62 deaths per 1,000 for vaginal delivery.
The research, conducted
by experts from BCM, the Texas Department of State Health Services, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas and the University of South Florida, used the Texas Department of State Health Services» Texas Birth Defects Registry data from 1999 - 2007 to retrospectively examine the associations between distance from birth center to a cardiac surgical center, number of newborns cared for with HLHS at each hospital, and
neonatal mortality in infants with HLHS.
The device for premature infants decreased
mortality rates at the
neonatal ward
by 46 percent, according to the foundation.
A first - of - its - kind study led
by Texas Children's Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), published online in the journal, Circulation, found that infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) born far from a hospital providing
neonatal cardiac surgery for HLHS have increased
neonatal mortality, with most deaths occurring before surgery.
Since the establishment of the first US
neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in 1960,1 the
neonatal mortality rate has fallen more than 4-fold, from 18.73 per 1000 live births to 4.04 per 1000 live births in 2012.2 Much of this decline can be attributed to the highly specialized care provided to premature and sick infants
by neonatologists and multidisciplinary teams working in NICUs.3, 4
Mother Nature allows outcrosses because she values heterogeneous genes, while she punishes homogeneous genes
by «culling» animals through a process of dwindling survivorship (
neonatal mortality), shortened lifespans, and infecundity.
In cases of
neonatal mortality, the diagnosis typically is made postmortem with virus isolation from fresh lung, liver, kidney, and spleen
by cell culture techniques and subsequent identification
by PCR and sequencing, transmission electron microscopy, immunofluorescence, or fluorescence in situ hybridization.