Right now, we pour about twice as much CO2 into the atmospheric tub than is removed on
net by natural processes.
Not exact matches
Most of the CO2 is also absorbed
by natural processes but the
net amount of CO2 is increasing and the man made percentage of the
net increase was about the 28 to 30 %.
This new concept of anthropogenic impacts on seawater pH formulated here accommodates the broad range of mechanisms involved in the anthropogenic forcing of pH in coastal ecosystems, including changes in land use, nutrient inputs, ecosystem structure and
net metabolism, and emissions of gases to the atmosphere affecting the carbon system and associated pH. The new paradigm is applicable across marine systems, from open - ocean and ocean - dominated coastal systems, where OA
by anthropogenic CO2 is the dominant mechanism of anthropogenic impacts on marine pH, to coastal ecosystems where a range of
natural and anthropogenic
processes may operate to affect pH.
... AGW has a real but minor effect compared to
natural cycles and
processes and data bias
by the official climate Team, and that a bit of warming and higher CO2 levels may turn out to be of
net benefit to humanity.
In previous postings here at WUWT I have estimated the human contribution to
net warming since 1880 at 0.2 ºC, the
natural cycles and
processes contribution over which we humans have no control at 0.3 ºC to 0.4 ºC, with the remainder of the supposed warming of 0.8 ºC due to data bias and cooking of the books
by the official climate Team.
I still believe that CO2 levels are rising largely due to human activities and that they contribute to
net mean warming, though not anywhere near the amount estimated
by the official climate Team, and far less than
natural processes not under human control.