Not exact matches
«The
net emission flows from western regions to eastern regions
in China may further
decline because of the faster economic growth
in the western regions.
China has a dominant contribution to these
net emission flows, but
emissions embodied
in its exports to developed countries have
declined.
Under the strictest pathway (RCP 2.6), which assumes an early peak of greenhouse gas
emissions which then
decline substantially, the potential
net increases
in mortality rates at the end of the century be minimal (between -0.4 % and +0.6 %)
in all the regions included
in this study, highlighting the benefits of the implementation of mitigation policies.
In general, so long as there is some solar heating beneath some level, there must be a net LW + convective heat flux upward at that level to balance it in equilibrium; convection tends to require some nonzero temperature decline with height, and a net upward LW flux requires either that the temperature declines with height on the scale of photon paths (from emission to absorption), or else requires at least a partial «veiw» of space, which can be blocked by increasing optical thickness above that leve
In general, so long as there is some solar heating beneath some level, there must be a
net LW + convective heat flux upward at that level to balance it
in equilibrium; convection tends to require some nonzero temperature decline with height, and a net upward LW flux requires either that the temperature declines with height on the scale of photon paths (from emission to absorption), or else requires at least a partial «veiw» of space, which can be blocked by increasing optical thickness above that leve
in equilibrium; convection tends to require some nonzero temperature
decline with height, and a
net upward LW flux requires either that the temperature
declines with height on the scale of photon paths (from
emission to absorption), or else requires at least a partial «veiw» of space, which can be blocked by increasing optical thickness above that level.
And for this the researchers have an explanation — and a funny way of expressing that: the drop from El Niño to La Niña, together with
declining solar insulation caused the cooling, because «rapid growth
in short - lived sulphur
emissions partially offsets rising greenhouse gas concentrations» — thus creating a smaller
net anthropogenic climate forcing.
And yet, despite accelerating
emission rates and concentrations, there's been no
net warming
in the 21st century and, more accurately, a
decline.»
This assumes global
emissions peak
in the next year or two and then
decline in a straight line, achieving
net zero
emissions shortly after mid-century, corresponding to a 66 % probability of less than 1.5 C of warming
in 2100 (narrow orange line).