The resulting
net planetary energy imbalance for the six years 2005 — 2010 is +0.58 ± 0.15 W / m2.
The resulting
net planetary energy imbalance for the six years 2005 — 2010 is +0.58 ± 0.15 W / m2.
Not exact matches
This
net loss / gain of
planetary energy during El Niño / La Niña is ishown in figure 3 for the tropics (a) and the global situation (b).
Smaller contributions to
planetary energy imbalance are from heat gain by the deeper ocean (+0.10 W / m2),
energy used in
net melting of ice (+0.05 W / m2), and
energy taken up by warming continents (+0.02 W / m2).
For a long time now climatologists have been tracking the global average air temperature as a measure of
planetary climate variability and trends, even though this metric reflects just a tiny fraction of Earth's
net energy or heat content.
A better metric to gauge to real
planetary effects of the TOA GHG induced imbalance is of course to combine combine troposphere anomalies with ocean heat content anomalies, as well as cryosphere anomalies, to get a
net Earth system
energy imbalance.
A slower growth rate of the
net climate forcing may have contributed to the standstill of global temperature in the past decade, but it can not explain the standstill, because it is known that the planet has been out of
energy balance, more
energy coming in from the sun than
energy being radiated to space.10 The
planetary energy imbalance is due largely to the increase of climate forcings in prior decades and the great thermal inertia of the ocean.