This is because
the net warming it reports includes the cooling effects of aerosols which partly masks the warming caused by greenhouse gases.
Not exact matches
«Adequate management of agricultural and forestry land uses are amongst the lowest - cost actions that can reduce global
warming, and most actions are either neutral cost or of positive
net profit to society, requiring no substantial capital investment,» the
report says.
In a
report published this month, the Food Climate Research Network (FCRN) reiterated that livestock production is a
net contributor to global
warming regardless of the species and the rearing method.
«The current world climate
report indicates clearly that
net - zero emissions are a precondition for limiting global
warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius.
«Although previous
reports suggest slight recent continental
warming, our spatial analysis of Antarctic meteorological data demonstrates a
net cooling on the Antarctic continent between 1966 and 2000, particularly during summer and autumn.»
Isn't it interesting that
warming would be a
net benefit for the U.S., according to the
report cited, yet the Green lunatics have crippled our fossil - fuel and nuclear industries to prevent the chimera of AGW?
The latest IPCC
report on climate change notes that our society will likely need
net negative emissions by the end of the century to avoid a 2 degree C
warming.
11/30/2015 - Why Scientists Disagree About Global
Warming 03/31/2014 —
Report Finds Global
Warming Causes» No
Net Harm» to Environment or Human Health 03/24/2014 — Benefits of Global
Warming Greatly Exceed Costs, New Study Says 10/15/2013 — Panel of Scientists Says UN Study Retreats, Misleads, and Misinforms 10/14/2013 — The Heartland Institute Replies to Trenberth and Oppenheimer 09/27/2013 — NIPCC, Heartland Institute React to UN IPCC Climate
Report Summary 09/16/2013 — Authors of NIPCC
Report Discuss Findings 09/06/2013 — Major New
Report on Climate Science Says Global
Warming Is Not a Crisis
The authors of the new
report say «the
net effect of continued
warming and rising carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere is most likely to be beneficial to humans, plants, and wildlife.»
Although the Watts, 2009
report speculated that the inadequate station siting of the U.S. Historical Climatology Network could have introduced a
warming bias into the current U.S. temperature trends, it did not attempt to quantify what the
net bias (if any) was.
As far as I can tell the
net warming in the IPCC AR5
report is considered 100 %.
The IPCC
reports overstate the certainty of future
warming associated with additional CO2, and definitely overstate the certainty of
net harms that may result from any
warming that does occur.
The authors of the new
report go on to say «the
net effect of continued
warming and rising carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere is most likely to be beneficial to humans, plants, and wildlife.»