Sentences with phrase «nets on a global basis»

Not exact matches

Toyota has introduced its new fifth - generation Avalon, based on a Toyota New Global Architecture (TNGA) platform, and powered by two new TNGA powertrains: a 301 hp, 267 lb - ft (362 N · m) 3.5 - liter V6 (2GR - FKS), and a 215 - net - horsepower 2.5 - liter Dynamic Force (earlier post) four - cylinder Toyota Hybrid System II (THS II) with 650V... Read more →

Toyota has introduced its new fifth - generation Avalon, based on a Toyota New Global Architecture (TNGA) platform, and powered by two new TNGA powertrains: a 301 hp, 267 lb - ft (362 N · m) 3.5 - liter V6 (2GR - FKS), and a 215 - net - horsepower 2.5 - liter Dynamic Force (earlier post) four - cylinder Toyota Hybrid System II (THS II) with 650V... Read more →

Beginning May 1, 2016, Southeastern has agreed to waive fees and / or reimburse expenses so that Global Fund Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses (excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions and extraordinary expenses) do not exceed 1.2 % of average net assets on an annualized basis.

Schroder Global Cities Real Estate Fund All fund performance data are on a NAV to NAV basis, net income reinvested.

There is no modelling of any orbital variations in incoming energy, either daily, yearly or long term Milankovitch variations, based on the assumption that a global yearly average value has a net zero change over the year which is imposed on the energy forcing at the TOA and the QFlux boundary etc..

Nature (with hopefully some constructive input from humans) will decide the global warming question based upon climate sensitivity, net radiative forcing, and oceanic storage of heat, not on the type of multi-decadal time scale variability we are discussing here.

That the global «North» may possibly have slight net benefit from GW (which I sort of doubt, based on other studies I've seen), at the expense of tremendous suffering in the global «South» (where the bulk of humanity lives), especially when it is the North that has reaped the most benefits associated with producing GHGs, is so unethical that even the most hard - hearted persons should quiver.

By a very very big margin, the net flow of latent and sensible heat is from ocean to atmosphere on a global basis.

From the data in this post it seems like uncontrolled fossil fuel burning is actually a net global coolant due to the sulfates, so it seems that this would act as a break on CO2 based warming effects.

UNDP's Rapport mondial sur le développement humain 2006 (PDF)-- which focuses on the global water crisis, is just one example of a model - based climate - impact study that shows net decreasing North - African food production as a result of continued global climate change.

Based on current knowledge, however, it appears that achieving a high probability of limiting global average temperature rise to 2C will require that the increase in greenhouse - gas concentrations as well as all the other warming and cooling influences on global climate in the year 2100, as compared with 1750, should add up to a net warming no greater than what would be associated with a CO2 concentration of about 400 parts per million (ppm).

Wehner and his co-authors of Chapter 2 of the NCA, which looked at the physical basis for our understanding of climate change, considered seven different future scenarios (including four new ones), ranging from the «do nothing» option to a geoengineering option, which would require an as - yet uninvented technology to take CO2 out of the atmosphere on a global scale, to achieve net negative emissions of greenhouse gases by 2050.

On that basis, she estimate the ENSO influence to be 0.4 degr.C, and the net global warming to be 0.68 deg.C, then declared that natural variation was responsible for more than half of recent global warming.

John Daly pointed out that the true net feedback may be about 0.2 C, based on the argument that the net greenhouse forcing is about 150 watts, global temperature increased about 33C due to that net feedback, and 33/150 = 0.22 C / watt.

I do not question that heat can be be advected to depths by downwelling, for certainly it can, I simply question the overall thermodynamic perspective given that the net flow of energy is always from ocean to atmosphere on a global basis.

On a NET climatic basis, more energy leaves the global ocean surface in the form of latent heat than in LW radiation and conduction / convection combined.

---- That's right, because the net flow of energy is massively from the ocean to atmosphere on a global basis, and at any given time at least 50 % of the energy in the atmosphere came directly from sensible or latent heat flux from the ocean.

This belief is based on the observation that if a corn plant grew, and then was burned, without any fossil fuel inputs or fertilizer, there would be no net gain in global warming gasses.

This a global conspiracy of smart issue based lobbyists making a fast regressive buck, based on the guesses of climate scientists, fraudulently linked to a regressive set of over subsidised solutions that actually make net grid sourced ACO2 emissions worse, exploiting the abject ignorance of the public and their politicians for a faster buck than doing the right thing.

The largest global - scale increases in net irrigation requirements result from a climate scenario based on the B2 emissions scenario.

A key issue of discussion surrounding the topic has been the choice of the NET ticker as there is already another token that uses the same NetCoin — a global cryptocurrency that was originally based on Litecoin's coin core.

Miami, in a state that doesn't collect income tax, ranked above Dubai, Paris and Beijing on a list of «cities that matter» to global high - net - worth investors, according to the 2014 «Wealth Report» by London - based consulting firm Knight Frank LLC.