If a judgment is published in a reporter, list
the neutral citation first, followed by the printed reporter.
Not exact matches
That being said, I think it is silly to require parallel
citations at all and would rather see courts require a static URL in addition to one
citation for a case,
neutral cite
first, any other
citation second and in the form that the publisher of that second
citation produced it in.
There are two
neutral citation sources for
first instance family judgments below the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal (each of which report their own family cases): judgements of Family Division judges (EWHC (Fam)-RRB- and of other family court cases (EWFC).
I worked with the authors (who were law postgrads) on AGLC for the 1st and 2nd editions, and the aim of it was to address the newly emerging e-resources — Australia being the
first place to have
neutral citations endorsed by its High Court in 1995, and because the Blue Book did not deal with Australian materials.