Not exact matches
Franky Schaeffer decries
neutrality as a «myth» which results
in a freedom from religion and the exclusion of all those who operate on the basis of religious convictions from involvement
in public life (Time for Anger, pp. 19 - 20).
Removing traditional Christmas displays from
public places suggests not
neutrality about religion
in public life, but hostility.
While it may seek (
in its sincere expressions) only
neutrality toward religion, strict separationism
in fact evidences a certain hostility toward religion — the effect of which is to deprive society of necessary moral and spiritual resources, to misinterpret and misrepresent the history of our culture, and to provoke anger and resentment among those who never consented to make our
public life a «secular» enterprise.
No doubt her argument that the ban will survive scrutiny is based on some purported need of Quebec to legislate religious
neutrality because of its history of church interference
in politics and
public life, up to the 1960s.