Sentences with phrase «never accepts a risk»

A rational investor never accepts a risk without a reasonable expectation of higher returns.

Never accept a risk without adequate compensation.

The correct statement of a risk - reward tradeoff is that you should never accept a risk unless you are paid enough.

The accurate statement is that you should never accept a risk unless you receive adequate compensation.

Not exact matches

First, you have to accept the risk that the client may pay late — or never.

With no current plans to accept Apple Pay (though down the line it, and other mobile wallets, could well be a payment option within Walmart Pay), and no set launch date for MCX (never mind that as the product of consortium, that mobile app will not be set up to meet Walmart's specific needs), Walmart could wait no longer without risking missing out on a major shift in customer behavior.

Consumer brands are usually very sensitive to how they're perceived, making them far more vulnerable to online action than a typical politician — Congressional offices EXPECT to get criticized via email, and they accept that many constituents will simply never be happy with them, but a corporation takes a great risk if it runs off even a few of its customers.

We have never before knowingly accepted such risks for the sake of scientific experiments, and we need an exceptionally compelling rationale before we consider doing so now.

«We all have to accept that your risk is never going to be zero,» she said of the possibility of a drilling spill.

But Hollywood's old - boy network never fully accepted Hughes, and in time his passion for flying began to reclaim his attentions as he began designing new planes, setting air speed records, flying around the world, and risking his life testing aircraft.

But, basically, you should never risk more money per trade than you are TRULY OK with losing, because you COULD lose on ANY trade, let the be your guiding principle before you enter any trade, because if you really accept this statement you will not ever risk more than you are comfortable with losing.

I think this is the most important investing philosophy that they espouse: «Never Take on Too Much Risk, or Accept Too Little» but it is totally ambiguous!

You need to approach your risk management with the understanding that any one trade can be a loser, if you truly accept that then you will never risk more than you care to lose on any one trade.

You'll never be forced to smoke, however, in some cultural scenarios you're better off accepting someone's offer of a cigarette rather than risking loss of face by refusing it.

If you aren't willing to accept some risk, then you'll never be ready to go solo.

These sorts of limited - scope files are in and out of your office quickly and never run the risk of becoming dog files; the work is usually easily accomplished and enjoyable; and, accepting further work is always discretionary.

The biggest reason is obviously so that you never risk a penny of your own money, but another benefit is that for an attorney to accept your case, they must believe they stand a very good chance at winning you more compensation.

However, never forget that successful business depends on taking intelligent risks and accepting accountability — leaders who don't, demonstrate that they will never drive forward innovation or improvement, which is, ultimately, what we're all in our jobs to do.

If you do set a minimum score never go below it when accepting any applicant otherwise you risk making it invalid as a tool to eliminate applicants in the future.