4:14) Although we may
never agree on the point at which a developing life becomes a human person, we are compelled to take nascent life seriously and to ask when it is no longer morally acceptable to experiment on or discard human embryos.»
Not exact matches
I
agree with Bill Maher, but then again I'm a lifelong atheist... I have
never believed for one minute that the god as portrayed in the bible or koran has any possibility of being real to everyone, otherwise that god would make itself obvious and not hide behind man made lies and cultural practices that self perpetuate thanks fo fear... otherwise there would not be several thousand man made religions trying to claim that god as their own... yes, it is an opinion, only valid to the opinion holder and no one else... Bill, thanks for so strongly making that
point, not that it makes any difference to god fearing people... they will hold
on to their opinion as strongly as they hold
on to their shotgun, thinking that each provides them with some form of security... to intelligent people, neither is secure and neither leads to true freedom of the mind...
I have to
agree on the logic
point, that would actually be a Christian thing to do; therefore; it will
never happen.
I
agree with the
points being made about not having had much time, but thats what defines good players from average players, a good player would always come in and make himself count
on the park, i do nt know i have
never really been a fan of eduardo..
Instead, we will say «
Agree to disagree» or «It is what it is» and we will
never actually do the WORK that is required to outline the major
points on these topics and examine them.
One sticking
point that has been removed: The governor apparently has
agreed to give up
on appointing the majority of commission members, which was an issue for goo - goos who have
never thought it appropriate for the executive to control the entity that polices the executive branch.
I can totally
agree with you
on each and every
point, especially investing in cute workout clothes, something I
never cared about, but right now feels necessary.
The «science is
NEVER settled», Mosh (it appears we
agree on that)-- I have just concluded, based
on all the data and constraints out there at this
point in time, that the potential CAGW threat depicted by IPCC (expressed as theoretical GH warming above today's temperature) is not realistic.
You seem to have skipped it entirely, and just invented some agreement
on this
point which has
never been
agreed.
I'm a Reagan Republican and my best friend for 30 years happens to be a liberal, and even though I don't
agree with him
on many political things he often
points out things that help me understand what an issue is about that I would
never have thought of myself, or would have heard from my conservative friends.
It's a
point I touched
on before in an article about why fracking may
never succeed in the UK, and Damian Carrington over at The Guardian appears to
agree — suggesting that while gas company Cuadrilla will no doubt appeal, the political mood toward fracking is souring.
One is
never entirely certain whether both authors
agree on everything, having debated each
point until exhausted.
Some industry veterans
agree to this
point and even go
on to add that a bezel-less display isn't actually that remarkable
on a phone as the size of the panel can
never be big enough to matter.
Fact: «The sheer prevalence of the problem of violence and the dynamics surrounding it make it clear any assumptions about equal partnership in these cases are out of the question... the majority of women
never report the assaults or in fact ever tell anyone about it (Johnson, 1996) and thus may not be believed if the first time the issue is raised is at the
point of separation... may avoid going to court out of fear of retaliation, a fear which is not unfounded given the data
on the escalation of violence at separation...
agree to whatever the husband wants in an attempt to pacify him... as an exchange for custody... may appear unstable or emotional while their batterers are perceived as confident, rational and economically secure (Rosnes, 1997)... all the research flies in the face of what Rosnes argues is presently happening in the courts:»... judges assume that wife abuse is not necessarily damaging to a child, and that being violent does not necessarily affect a father's parenting ability....
Strength of beliefs about the illness was measured
on patient rated seven
point Likert - type scales («totally
agree» to «totally disagree») and frequency of coping behaviours (for example, avoiding exercise)
on five
point patient rated scales («
never» to «all the time»).
Items are scored
on an 11 -
point scale, with 0 representing Worst possible health / Disagree completely / Often and 10 representing Best possible health /
Agree completely /
Never.