But
never breach confidentiality of information that should remain with the company.
Not exact matches
In addition to the unacceptable conduct the employer knew about at the time of dismissal, the employer at trial also argued that use of a company phone for a purpose that was
never intended, that is recording conversations with senior management, was a deliberate violation of the employee's duty of
confidentiality and a
breach of trust and loyalty to the defendant.
The major implications for banks targeted by HMRC will be the administrative burden of producing the information requested; the risk of
breaching confidentiality laws in the countries where the offshore accounts are held — for example under Swiss and Cayman Islands law there are criminal sanctions for
breaching client
confidentiality — and other conflict of laws issues; and the risk of Financial Services Authority investigations if it seems that the bank had encouraged the use of offshore accounts in a misleading way, eg by advertising them as tax - free, or by suggesting that HMRC would
never know about the income earned on sums in the accounts.
It is quite right to point out that anonymity can not be guaranteed and must not be relied on as a cloak (this is why I decided from the outset not to bother blogging anonymously), but why not simply make plain that holders of judicial office should
never blog anything that would be inappropriate or would
breach confidentiality if their identity were to become known?