Sentences with phrase «never claimed i did»

Never claimed they did.

You're right, I never claimed I did, nor did I make any affirmative claim.

Not exact matches

Moore has dismissed these allegations, claiming he never heard of Corfman and Young, although he did acknowledge knowing Deason and another woman who came forward to the Post, Debbie Wesson Gibson.

Ciubotariu claims in his LinkedIn post that, to his knowledge, no one has ever been forced to work late or on weekends if they did not want to, and he has never been scolded for not answering an email after hours.

«Yelp has never done this and individuals making such claims are either misinformed, or more typically, have an axe to grind — whether businesses upset that Yelp will not remove reviews they don't like, or unscrupulous internet marketing «experts» trying to make a buck off of honest business owners with dubious reputation management schemes.»

I was embarrassed and prematurely claimed I would never do a seminar again.

In many ways it really does lure people into franchising, even if a franchisor has never made the claim.

Ruddy fired back Tuesday morning to Politico, saying in an email that Spicer's statement «doesn't deny my claim the President is considering firing Mueller» and «says I didn't speak to the president about the matter — when I never claimed to have done so.»

Damon said that he never witnessed any of the behavior that the women describe, saying that Weinstein «didn't do it out in the open,» but that he knew about Gwyneth Paltrow's claims that Weinstein had acted inappropriately with her when she was a 22 - year - old.

But if I ever get elected president, I will never claim credit for anything the market does, because I don't want to be blamed when it goes the other direction.

Musk claims he doesn't use Facebook and never has.

We never did fall into a liquidity trap that some members of the Feds are claiming we are in today.

Rosales has never filed a claim against a worker who violated a non-disparagement clause with an online post, and in his experience, he said, those clauses don't prevent workers from exercising their rights to speak about workplace conditions.

Or do you get to just make claims, have them proven wrong, backpedel and say thats not what you meant, then present a new idea you think science will never be able to prove only to be proven wrong almost before it's out of your mouth.

I never claimed they were «perfect»... but neither did G - d demand perfection.

How can we claim to follow someone we know through the words of someone who never met him and who didn't even have the benefit of the things written about him?

In which case I sincerely trust that you are not and have never claimed to be a Christian, because that is EXACTLY what Jesus tells the Rich Young Ruler to do if he truly wants to live a righteous life: «Sell all you have, give it to the poor, and come and follow me.»

The article never claims that persecution never happened, just that it didn't happen to the degree most people believe.

Oh never mind, all I will here is a bunch of the very hype you claim exist of the Bible because you will never truly do the research but you will uh break the commandment «thou shalt not lie.»

Veritas tried to claim I was using the bible to prove the truth, however it is trivially easy to see that I never once on this thread quoted the bible on anything he probably did nt even read my post, it is just a stock response.

The base fact you need to understand is that nothing never made anything, ever, and you're waiting for nothing to prove it so you can counter my claim that I'm still waiting for it to make a universe on my desktop... it never does... your science's «nothing god» is impotent and a huge time waster... for you... because you'll be spending a lot of time wasting away... and wondering why you didn't listen to someone that KNOWS God is there.

I'm sure you understand which is why you never answer questions like this directly, but to be sure — why do you trust claims in the bible (which are dubious at best) but would want verification in all other walks of life?

Well, let's just say I have my proof, and claims like must upset you, like a guy with a ferrari telling you that it's within your reach, but you'll probably never get one, because you don't really believe it's possible.

I never claimed that God didn't exist, did I?

Atheists never claimed that all us atheists practiced what we do in life as «good».

or by falsely claiming I mean s3x is crime which I never did.

That wasn't always the case... and scientists don't believe we are in the «center» of the universe... that has never been a scientific claim.

I am not perfect but I never stood at the front of a cult's clubhouse or anywhere else and claimed I was having conversations with and doing the work of some unfounded god.

I'm always amazed that people who claim insanity, even temporary insanity, never do good things.

I would never suggest that everything atheists do makes sense or is good, just as I hope you wouldn't try to claim everything Christians do makes sense or is good.

I can not claim that experience never happened because it did.

He is not saying that true Christians never sin, for that would blatantly contradict what he wrote earlier in his letter, where he said that everybody does sin, and the one who claims he does not sin is a liar (1 John 1:8 - 10).

An animal doesn't give birth to another species, never has Evolution made this claim.

First - off numbnuts, being an atheist is not a religion, we do not claim to be all knowing (actually just the opposite), never once claimed to be all powerful but the reasoning part is the bane of our debates because the religious are not reasoning, they are being emotional and make baseless claims.

That means I do not believe any of the god claims I have heard, because there is never, ever, any hard, verifiable, logical, objective evidence to support them.

Secondly, I never made the claims nor do I believe the points that you said I made.

«The cult - like behaviour of those who claim «once - gay, always - gay», saying that gay - identified and practicing folk never change and may not try to do so - even punishing those who do - is intrusive and bullying.»

I never claimed to be Christian, nor do I ever want to, since doing so usually puts me on the same pedestal as ignorant individuals such as yourself, sedreck.

Even letters confidently assigned to Paul which are believed to be some of the earliest do not count because Paul never claims to have met Jesus.

You will never find ANY answers if you don't start employing LOGIC, stop putting words in other peoples mouths, and back up YOUR claims.

It's weird to me that you believe that even after 1000 drops and 1000 of the same result you still believe that if a random person you have never met claimed that his ball did not fall then that's proof positive that the law of gravity was broken and that it is possible even though no one was there to verify it, or anyway to recreate it.

Even, or perhaps especially, when whites engage in this transaction, one can not help suspecting that they don't really believe what they claim to believe, and that for them black non-achievement has another, less respectable but never spoken, explanation.

1) what scripture do you cite to support the claim that Jesus was never married?

@Tony I never ceased to be amazed by the number fo people that claim to be seekers of truth while at the same time arrogantly proclaiming that all those that reach different conclusions than they do are just making the bible say what they want it to say.

So, you're saying that I have the burden of proof and I have to prove that it is a fact that there is a God, even hough I never did actually claim that it was a fact that there is a God, but rather that I believe.

Second, I have never claimed that as a human I will have the answer for everything, but the one answer I will never use is «if I can't understand it, it must the doing of a supernatural being».

Does not our founding document, the Declaration of Independence (never mentioned by Schlesinger, interestingly), ground its claims in «Nature's God»?

If you consider all those other gods to be mythical creatures that never actually existed, but you claim that your God was different, then it's up to you to back up that claim and, so far, you have done rather poorly.

They never heard of the word «specie» then so don't claim they used «genus» for «kind».

'' (I have never name and claimed a mercedes, or useless materialstic worldly things),» You have nver done so becuause deap down you know it wouldn't work.