We never know the characters all that well and they feel secondary to the mood.
Not exact matches
Most writers spend countless hours brainstorming
characters and plot, and they even write page after page that they
know they'll
never include in the book.
Most of us will
never need to
know which
characters map to which Unicode numbers, but modern computing could scarcely do without Unicode.
Because he
knows his base doesn't read much, would
never go through dozens of pages of a transcript, and can be made to believe anything in 140
characters or less.
Anyway, we have come to the conclusion that YES, God is God and he can do whatever HE wants, but He can
never act outside of HIs
character, and when we understand God's
character is good and loving and compassionate and so on, then we are not threatened by Him doing what he wills, because we
know His will is always good.
What kind of thinking can a reasonable, intelligent person use to justify this kind of
character assassination upon someone they hardly even
know and had
never had a hard word pass from my lips to theirs?
God, who created this infinite universe, and all that's in it being reflection of His infinite attributes, with even the smallest things so detailed in their design, that it would be total absurdity to think they have gotten that way by evolving themselves... this Creator would have
never created us, human beings, giving us such abilities that we posses, without giving us a way to understand Him, His nature and His
character and to
KNOW Him, as we are
known of Him.
but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price,
knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has
character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has
never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..
A Hemingway
character never walks into a bar anywhere in the world without
knowing the bartender and the ideal drink to order before expertly going off to do the most wonderful adventure wherever he happens to be.
Sometimes i do nt understand some people saying thing like Benzema is not what we need and that he is not that good.Some people lack reasoning to be very honest.They do nt think before talking.I wonder why people say that because when you watched him from his first season up to this season he really is that good.Some arsenal legends are saying we need him almost everyone is saying so too.We need him and stop judging his
character because you have
no right to judge anyone.Giroud is an average striker and i am not judging him from yesterday's game i am judging him from season 1 to this season.He is nothing special and has
never been.
Joining a club of arsenal s stature has its ups and downs.There is a requirement of how our players should perform when on the pitch.The following is a list of players who were wrong to choose arsenal.Aaron ramsey - Even though he is the most favoured of all players at the club now.I cant help but think how it would have gone for Him if he decided to search for other greener pastures.He was a clear talented footballer during his time at cardiff but he hasnt been raised with the discipline at arsenal.You can always see ramseys all round strengths but sadly Its not helping him or the club with his foward moving pleasurr.He is so Over used and its sometimes difficult for him to get used to the rythm of the game.With time you realise he gets low ib confidence and his engine gets wasted.He needed somebody who would have managed him properly and with care and that person is certainpy not wenger.You would have been better off at Manu mate.Calum chambers - Came us a very talented player from southampton with raw talent.He was very good at first but wenger found a way to reduce his level of confidence.His inexperience was left exposed and wenger did nt do anything to resolve that problem and instead He looked for other talented players.Alex oxlade chamberlain - Another very talented player who needed only his skilled sharpened and his
character modelled.That and he was ready to become a world beater.But wenger decided to let him run and run like a headless chicken causing him to be often injured and damaging his confidence.Who
knows what would have happened to him gad he decided to look for more greener pasture.He is surely a much better player than this.Theo walcott - Another player who was tipped to have a very bright future.He had it in him.But all he needed was an appropriate manager who would nurture him with discipline and help him with his talent.But on Coming to arsenal he was given Much more responsiblities putting more weight on his shoulders on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and
never coming off age because his
character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibility
A national debate thrived over Hoddle's
character and his place in the team, and certainly Ron Greenwood, who picked him and dropped him, picked him and dropped him again,
never seemed quite to
know what do with him.
If Mr wenger built a team who
never lost it tells me he can build a team remember a team consists of 11 different
characters with different back grounds beliefs and aspirations and problems with another 11 to back them up I remember years ago the press used to talk about arsenal and not having English players on the field
never the less I
know off our own fatalities as such we were somehow always coming up little short by injuries to such Edwardo vanpercie and even gas diaby ramsy rosiscky carzola and many more and others that did nt seem to gel well I am not blind and I
know we are not doing well but to suggest that Mr wenger docent have a clue is totally preposterous and disrespectful
He's a person who one of his strengths is his
character and you
never really
know how people are going to do until you put them in.
But it's not perfect... for the life of me I'll
never understand why a grown woman would butt in line in front of a toddler to hug someone in a Winnie The Pooh costume, why parents would wait for eons in line (in the blazing sun) so their child can get an autograph from a movie
character (umm — you
know that's not really Ariel, right?)
The book doesn't so much delve into that and I had more questions about how, but one thing it discusses is the helicopter - parented child who
never has to figure anything out for himself, gets to college and after college and doesn't really
know how to make things happen because he's
never been given the opportunity / challenge or had certain
character traits instilled.
And
no matter: Read lots of nice bedtime books about babies and siblings (although
never at the expense of a familiar favorite) and see if any of his favorite preschool cartoons or
characters have a sibling - specific episode or book.
Fitzroy, who swore by physiognomy (judging
character based on outward appearance), had also
known it all along: Darwin's nose pointed to a deficiency in energy and resoluteness; his knowledge of people indicated that this young gentleman was
never going to make it till the end of the journey.
If you are into movies like I am then am sure that you have watched a few where the
character finds himself entering some sort of flying object & being transferred into a parallel world that he
never knew existed.
You can really go into any
character you want on vacation and no one has to
know that you would
never be caught dead in that outfit at home Before I start packing I always take to Instagram to see what the styles are at the location we are headed to and sometimes I even check out restaurants we are going to really scope out the dress code.
With procedurally generated cities and multiple
characters for the story this means you will
never quite
know where to go or what route is safe and therefore presumably increase the immersion factor.
Unfortunately, while the Magnificent Seven gave viewers the time to get to
know the
characters and watch the team build a true sense of comradery for me that
never happened for me in this film.
This man set up a profile to specifically target women he
knew he could
never get any attention from based on his own
character (or lack thereof).
Yes I
know what you're thinking, I have
never heard of this «Spirit»
character.
No matter how loony its
characters get, Re-Animator
never plays them for laughs.
But she therefore typically can
never be aware of the film's overall meaning or additional layers, as she has to stay in
character and stick to what only her
character knows.
Creators Fey and Carlock instill Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt with the infectious positivity of their title
character, who won't give up,
no, she'll
never give up.
Except for Grand Moff Tarkin, who was basically a bunch of Peter Cushing - shaped pixels, none of the major players were people we
knew; most of them were
characters we'd
never heard of, the grunts and redshirts of the galactic war, and that meant anything could happen to them, and that the film didn't have to set aside a certain amount of space for enacting things we'd heard about but
never seen dramatized.
Characters decisions affect everyone and you never no what can come out of a characte
Characters decisions affect everyone and you
never no what can come out of a
characterscharacters choice.
The film follows the actress, played magnificently by Juliette Binoche as she hesitates and then prepares for the new production, and Assayas manages to mix the actress's feelings with the text of the play so that you
never quite
know if the actress or her
character in the play is speaking.
Fonzi's performance is perfectly judged; she
knows when to hold back, convincing us of her
character's sanity, and yet we
never lose sight of her strength, of her power.
And every so often it's refreshing to have a movie that dares to say - you
know,
no matter what all the screenwriting gurus tell you, some
characters never change.
Like the wayward lives of its
characters, it's
never knowing what's going to happen next that makes for a fixating film.
The relationship built between these two
characters takes on a cat and mouse nature quality as Jackie feeds the hungry journo juicy bits of candid knowledge, only to then tell him, «You
know I'm
never going to allow you to publish that, right?»
While Stephen Curry, perhaps best
known for the Australian drama series The Secret Life of Us, seems game for most of the crasser elements of the film, his
character of Teddy seems woefully underwritten and he
never is able to bring the depth he wants to exhibit to the
character.
And the show's writers, including TV veteran John Wirth,
never met a bit part they couldn't turn into a memorable
character who instantly lets you
know who they are through a single line of dialogue.
I think it is, because there is no story, no
characters, and we
never know who Bill is, or why these people are trying to kill each other.
It seems like Depp was
never told «
no» to any of his ideas, and the film has to indulge the actor's notion that audiences wouldn't be able to get enough of his
character, so we're also forced to endure him in the useless framing device.
The film gives you a little chance to meet and get to
know some of the
characters in the first act, but once the Marines find out they are under attack, the film goes into full - on adrenaline mode where the intense action
never stops.
In fairness to Bryan Singer though, who
knows this world inside and out having already directed X-Men, X2 and Days of Future Past, he manages to maintain a comprehensive layout, giving each arc attention and appeal so there is
never a dull moment or
character.
Warner Bros., MGM and New Line Cinema have continued their marketing push for director Ryan Coogler's upcoming Rocky spinoff Creed by releasing two
character posters featuring Michael B. Jordan as Adonis Johnson and Sylvester Stallone as Rocky Balboa... SEE ALSO: Watch the latest trailer for Creed Adonis Johnson (Jordan)
never knew his famous father, world -LSB-...]
Considering her dire circumstances, the once - hopeless love interest of Terrence Howard's
character, DJay, develops confidence she
never knew she had.
The same goes for the armor - clad Teutonic princess, Hilde; her
character profile on the Soul Calibur V site claims that she's now the mother of two children, but you'd
never know that from playing the actual game.
Marvel's TV and movie efforts have only been integrated in passing, which has meant the resurrected Coulson
never got to be reunited with the big screen
characters he once
knew, despite his tenure on Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.
It doesn't seem those
characters have any future together, after hints of a strange connection existing between them, but you
never know.
Crucially, there's just enough
character growth and variety (little bits of their pre-apocalypse lives help dictate their personality and skills) that you
never get used to losing survivors,
no matter how essential a part of the game it is.
This all comes off as more interesting in the synopsizing than in the actual telling; screenwriter Peter Landesman («Parkland») and director Michael Cuesta («L.I.E.,» the «Homeland» pilot) bobble their portrayal of journalism early on — you'll flinch if you
know the first thing about newspaper captions or the inverted - pyramid style of reportage — and they (along with Renner)
never make Webb a captivating enough
character to follow through the ups and downs of this saga.
You
never know who's working for who, who is looking out for themselves, or who may turn on another
character.
This leaves us with a confused impression of his abusive mentor figure,
knowing that there is a softer side to the
character, but the audience are
never allowed to
know the details of what that is.
We
never really
know that much about those
characters beyond what we need to
know in the moment.