Sentences with phrase «never made public»

Facebook has now apologized for the retention of videos that were never made public, blaming it on a «bug» and calling the glitch unintentional.

We don't know when Facebook decided to secretly nuke Zuckerberg's chats, since the company never made it public.

In 2018, there are secret courts (FISA) who can establish searches of your information and that information is never made public.

The class action allege that the bank analysts involved were privy to insider information regarding revenue expectations for the second quarter and the full year, but that this information was never made public.

The story is framed by the U.S. State Department's blacklists during WWII, and Vázquez uses this practice as a parallel for the personally concealed blacklist — thoughts that are never made public but are still devastating.

The results were so controversial they were never made public, because they revealed the true scale of the variation in mean intake cognitive ability between affluent and socially deprived postcodes.

Bailey April 30, hookup in las vegas b Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Bqiley in your details below or dating beth l bailey an icon to log in Email required Address never made public.

It's even free to join the mature personals on this page, your email address and private details are protected and never made public.

Those data were never made public, but were provided to the Swedish pharmaceutical company Astra AB as part of a $ 22 million, multiyear agreement.

Although the amount of the settlement was never made public, the funds were provided by the Congressional Office of Compliance, an agency set up in 1995 to resolve labor and other disputes, including sexual - harassment complaints, brought by congressional staffers against lawmakers.

«Mrs. Obama has never made any public statements about same - sex marriage,» her communications director, Kristina Schake, said in an email to POLITICO.

The decision was never made public.

The report however was never made public.

Since Gosling has made vague comments about being «religious» in interviews, several Christian outlets grabbed onto a single word and assigned born - again status to a celebrity who has never made any public comments to confirm it.

Facebook has now apologized for the retention of videos that were never made public, blaming it on a «bug» and calling the glitch unintentional.

Anything you post in our keto forum is private to our community and we'll never make it public.

We never make public the titles of any books that were not selected for a BookViral review, or the names of their authors.

Google has not revealed the specifics of this latest change to its algorithm (true to form, as the company never makes public the finer details of its super-secret algorithms).

Not exact matches

While evidence for the Softcard strategy was never public, it was often rumored that the carriers behind the mobile wallet were making it more difficult for their customers to use Google Wallet.

Today, life histories of everyday people are made public on the Internet, never to be erased.

EShares software can help workers make money from their stock options even if their employer never goes public.

Earlier generations would never have thought of making certain issues public; privacy was highly valued.

Unless those complaints are made in a public forum like Twitter, you may never know the true reason customers aren't coming back.

They have never been made public.

Bitcoin is open and viewable by everyone in the world, and what makes it amazing is this public ledger called the blockchain, which is immutable; meaning transactions in the blockchain can never be changed once verified.

Isizwe's policy is simple: we never make a profit when selling services to the public sector.

You have full control over which of your activities will be made public and we will NEVER publish personal information or investment amounts.

It's never a good idea to criticize a former customer in the public light; however, be sure to explain your side of the story without being defensive (as this will create the feeling that you are trying to compensate for a mistake you made).

Nonetheless, Professor Evans has made a well - argued and civil contribution to the never - ending debate about religion and public life.

Public policies on the poor have never done anything but make people better at being poor.

As for your seriously off base torture comparison, if we saw a drastic increase in violent crimes, and there was a public outcry for harsher punishments to try and serve as a deterrent, and the Bill was drafted, made open to the public, and the solid majority of the population didn't turn against it with protests, signatures, and contacting their representatives; maybe a torture law could make it (though it would never get past the Supreme Court as the Consttution is now, but we'll let that slide as a hypothetical).

But one could say that the movement had never been other than «religiocified» «-- though it was the «Reverend» prefixing names like King, Young, Shuttlesworth, Fauntroy, Abernathy and Bevel that made the public aware of the deep religious roots of the civil rights movement and of black rhetoric.

Technical reason can never tell us about ends, and the public freedom we need is always related to that telos that end in terms of which society as a whole makes sense.

And they will likely never come forward to press charges or make public accusations because they fear Internet retaliation.

What makes it different from, say, a hate campaign against a public figure is that it tends to revolve around a single incident and inspires people who never had any prior dealings with the individual to focus white - hot anger at them (usually demanding that they be sacked).

Listen I keep seeing bumper stickers like «you can't be both Catholic and pro-choice» these are not reflective of my faith, theser are slogans made for propaganda, I have 2 beautiful children and I have never been on a position where abortion could even play a part, but it is a legal option to the public at large; this being said even the bible calls for us to be good citizens, and to obey the law, I believe that this is a matter that belongs with the family and not the state; no matter how we criminalize abortion, they will not stop, but people will go under - ground and more fatalities will occur, I rather see the government placing incentives on more conseling for these expectant mothers and more outreach done at church levels, to reduce the debate to a single slogan is dangerous and will not accomplish the ultimately goal of preventing abortions my two humble cents

The article never mentions the word «Dominionism,» but it is what Perry and Palin and Bachmann believe... that the US is to fill all public offices with conservative Christians, make it a Christian nation, and have dominion over all other religions, and eventually all other nations.

They say what they feel they must say to get our support when they want our support, but on so many issues - on modernising our politics, on the recall of MPs, on controlling our borders on less government, on bank reform, on cutting public debt, on an EU referendum - they never actually make it happen.»

The good folks at the Internet Archive have made it their mission to collect and organize pop cultural artifacts, making them available to the general public to ensure they never go forgotten.

Sometimes we learn nothing by doing except the bare deed, as when children are taught to read by being required simply to read but never learn that written words refer to a whole world beyond them or when theological students are taught to «preach» by being required to make public addresses but never discover the difference between a sermon and an oration.

While it may seek (in its sincere expressions) only neutrality toward religion, strict separationism in fact evidences a certain hostility toward religion — the effect of which is to deprive society of necessary moral and spiritual resources, to misinterpret and misrepresent the history of our culture, and to provoke anger and resentment among those who never consented to make our public life a «secular» enterprise.

If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all decision - making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little more than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half - brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again

He bcms villian if the players do nt perform bt he never makes any player villian in public.

When, as here, it is possible to verify whether public assertions made by plaintiffs are true, there should never be a statement in the press by board members that gives credibility to sensational headlines or what can best be described as «false news.»

Gazidis is a hack... he will never get another substantive job in this sport unless Kroenke is the owner... enough of dealing with the amateurs, anybody who believes that this man has any real say in the day - to - day operations of Arsene Inc. hasn't followed this club very closely... in fact I used to empathize with him; who would come out and make some of the statements he has, especially regarding our financial capabilities, unless he was instructed to do so under false pretenses... let's face it, if that wasn't the case, he would have been thrown to the wolves long ago... on the other hand, if he did know and public deception was well within his job description, he's truly a piece of shit

They said the National Fly Casting League would never work, but we showed»em, and now the public is entitled to know how, with the aid of Miss Celeste Mossway and under my leadership, we overcame all obstacles and made millions

Miller, never one to miss an opportunity for a public appearance, will make his fourth straight Pro Bowl start.

That might have swung the election, though we'll never know because the official tally isn't made public.

1) How anyone, especially the watching media and the joe public punter can write off DO completely and assign him the «never gonna make it» tag.

Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger has never admitted in public, but it was widely reported that he had made an approach to Schalke for Julian Draxler in January.