Sentences with phrase «never much evidence»

Not exact matches

Never mind that Silvercorp's chief financial officer, Maria Tang, had cobbled together as much evidence as she and her team could in the short time to demonstrate the legitimacy of Silvercorp's figures.

With faith in your heart, you do not need to pursue proof or empirical evidence through human means which you will never find because God Is Spirit, thus, so much greater than mortal men which He created who have limited knowledge.

As much as your point is dead - on, I'm sorry to say you may as well be shouting in a hurricane: The faithful will never let anything like facts, logic, evidence or even rationality get in the way of their beliefs.

And never once, so much as a shred of hard evidence.

But no matter how much evidence there is, it will never be enough.

Atheism is as much of a belief as any religion; there can never be conclusive evidence that proves there is no God, just as there can never be conclusive evidence that proves there is one.

I corrected you both times, that I never made a claim about the existence of minds or evidence (though isn't it blatantly obvious to you, me, and pretty much everyone, that they do exist?).

People born with birth defects so they can't choose, people who are psychotic or sociopaths and incapable of controlling their minds, people who are born in fundamentalist Muslim areas who never had the opportunity to choose or who would be murdered on the spot if they so «chose», people who God gave too much intelligence too to believe such an inane demand without more evidence, people who die in natural disasters before they were quite willing to convert etc. etc..

There are just some who will unfortunately never open their minds no matter how much evidence is put before them.

It is much more probable, given the overwhelming amount of evidence that exists today, that Jesus never even existed.

I can't prove God's existence just as much as scientist can't prove the big bang... there is evidence of both but to reach a conclusion takes faith... one side leaves hope and the other does not... maybe I'm agnostic too because I don't claim to know everything about why I'm here, I have to have faith... Honestly, I'm sick of the extremes on both sides... the conservative judgmental Christian, who never thought through things as to why the believe what they do (ie Dinosaurs, cavemen, evolution, etc.) and the intellectually arrogant atheist and humanists.

The influence of these older evolutionary cosmologies on Whitehead's thought, moreover, is never carefully examined so much as it is presupposed.1 Against such presuppositions, I shall argue here that evolution and evolutionist theories play no significant role in Whitehead's metaphysics, and that there is no evidence in his major works of any significant influence from earlier process - oriented «evolutionary cosmologies.»

In Bultmann's essay the synoptic gospels are never so much as mentioned as evidence for the kerygma, and John figures only as the satellite of Paul.

As long as Science seeks only material evidences for all unanswered questions, it nevertheless would never be able to progress much.

The fact you profess with such gusto that you are a christian and a creationist says that no matter how much evidence to the contrary of your beliefs is made available (and there is already volumes of information) you will never accept truth b / c you have been engrained and programmed to believe one set of precepts and only that set.

Pseudoscience never sees the need to change, no matter how much evidence piles up against a theory.

But here, too, the evidence from Dutch surveys is heresy: despite lawful availability, the majority of Dutch people never try marijuana, and most who do try it don't continue to use even marijuana very often, much less harder drugs.

There is still so much to learn and science will never grasp it all but the evidence in how essential and incredibly healthy plant foods are, is abundant and clear... It's quite simple.

I'm not going to lie, when I read this I was shocked as I have never thought to combine these two but after a quick search I found so much evidence on Pinterest to support this color combo!

Prey for Rock & Roll never gets much more clever than the homonym of its title: you want it, it eats you up — and through it all there's glaring musical evidence that Clam Dandy is obscure and unsuccessful for a reason.

I never saw it myself, but the common complaints were a dirty source print and too much black crush, neither of which are in evidence on the new disc, whose 1.78:1, 1080p presentation is the best this movie could hope to look without scrubbing all the lo - fi»80s charm out of the image.

We will talk about whether that divide is inevitable and perhaps unbridgeable, which would mean we must accept that much policymaking will never be evidence - based.

Although such offsets will never be enough to overcome all opposition, some voters will be open to evidence about how much harm was really done and whether efforts have been made to mitigate it.

I've driven other Countaches and never experienced this before, and Harry says the car was nailed - on during his last European adventure, so we conclude with no evidence that the tread depth of the new Pirellis (made in evo 174 to the original tread pattern but with a much softer compound) is too deep and they're wobbling around at speed like winter tyres.

I've never seen any compelling evidence that it helps much.

He does not spend much time marshalling further evidence for his assertion that failure is optional: it's clear that Schuller, the author of Move Ahead with Possibility Thinking and Tough Times Never Last, but Tough People Do!

It is never a good idea to enter a trade based on one factor alone, which is why I look for as much evidence as possible to confirm a trade.

As a cat owner, Amy Novotny never thought much about heartworms.But a few weeks ago Novotny, a 31 - year - old magazine editor who lives in south Orange County, was devastated to learn that her cat, Buster, has the dreaded parasites.A cat with heartworms?Until this year the veterinary community thought cats rarely contracted heartworms, which have long been a serious problem for dogs.Emerging evidence, however, has convinced veterinarians that cats also are susceptible to heartworms.

The model output is evidence of the result of the many processes working together, much as the Pythagorean theorem provides evidence about the hypoteneuses of a large set imperfectly studied right triangles; or long term simulations of the planetary movements based on Newton's laws provide evidence that the orbits are chaotic rather than periodic; or simulations provide evidence that high - dimensional nonlinear dissipative systems are never in equilibrium or steady state even with constant input.

This has never been demonstrated, there is no evidence at all that it exists, and all the available evidence says the basic heating effect of CO2 is 1.1 C per doubling is all there is and that much warming only happens in very dry environments with increasingly less surface warming where water is available to evaporate.

Put these things together with the fact that no hard evidence of outside hacking has been presented by UEA, despite «illegal break - in» becoming an almost desperate mantra from the earliest days, presumably to avoid the unwashed masses drawing the conclusion that not only the science isn't settled, one of the insiders hates the phony consensus so much they're willing to go to these extreme lengths to bust it open... and I've never rated the outside operation theory one bit.

There has never been a year in California's history with this much advance warning regarding the potential for very heavy precipitation, and there is still time for individuals and government agencies to take steps to mitigate the related hazards likely to emerge in the coming weeks and months (fortunately, all evidence suggests that the relevant authorities are taking this El Niño seriously).

Though the book covers much of the same ground, albeit at a lower reading level, as Al Gore's famous global warming presentation, it is never alarmist, and instead focuses on the grounded evidence for global climate change and the collective efforts of many different kinds of scientists.

Much like Bernie Madoff's ponzi scheme, this scheme, with its constant infusions of material that could be libel / slander against skeptic climate scientists, was also doomed to fail from the start, built on a foundation of sand about its core «evidence» that was pushed by a person who never won a Pulitzer, and whose narratives don't line up right.

Seeing how much of a ruckus the «birthers» were able to raise over Obama's birthplace by suspecting him to be born out of the U.S. against evidence, actually being born outside of the U.S. is going to be a problem for Cruz, never mind the actual legal situation.

If possible, try to preserve the evidence as much as possible because you never know what will come in handy.