Sentences with phrase «never play the same game»

Random encounters as you play mix the game up to the point where you will never play the same game twice.

With procedurally generated boards, players will never play the same game twice.

With more than 50 levels of randomized gameplay in story mode, players will never play the same game twice.

Not exact matches

Surely There must have been better candidates than Hodgson England have actually a pretty decent group of players to chose from yet the same old selecting players who aren't England quality they play a couple of games then never get selected again.

let's call it as we see it, regardless of being played out of position by Le Prof, he lacks ambition, he needs to sweat the shirt the same as his teammates, I don't expect him to be a Sanchez, but dammit he needs to vamp his game... he was never the same after the loss (massacre) to Mancity when after the game BFG complaint about his attitude towards the Fans.

I would love to see Simeone as Wenger successor... I don't know why most of you don't like him, he is no Mourinho, his game is well balanced and he always play to the level of his players... A real warrior... For games like the last one (Everton), it will never be the same with Simeone...

Never mind that a team ALWAYS reflects its managers philosophy, in our case blindly playing the same way in a game even thought we are being overrun / outfought / outwitted etc etc..

They have a shelf life of 8/10 years at the very top if they are lucky so who can begrudge them the opportunity to make hay whilst the sun is shining... am not saying Sanchez is not money driven but the way the guy plays i can mortgage my life he actually enjoys the game, enjoys wining first and foremost then money comes 2nd... like the author of the article rightly pointed out, he was in Messi's shadow at Barca and could not express himself fully, now he is at a club where he is the main man and given a free role and license to express himself and i very much doubt if he will want to go to a club like Madrid (as been rumoured in the dailies today) to relieve the bad experience he suffered at Barca because let us face facts, he is never going to displace CR7 as the main man, so even if Madrid sells Benzema or Bale to make room for him he will be back to the same position he was at Barca, this time he will be playing 2nd fiddle to CR7 so my guess is all the Madrid talks is been fed the press by his agents to drive a hard bargain when contract extension talks resumes.....

I thought people here were debating about two or three seasons back why he should be our top striker.When I thought the Monaco match was the icing on the cake to show how average he was it seems just like Wenger we» will never learn our lesson.Now people our okay with him being a super sub which is debatable.Giroud was a super sub in games last season because he wasn't played when he was supposed to.He's not your ideal super sub because he very hardly creates but rather requires people to create for him.Most of the time super subs are the one's who tend to create the chances and open up spaces in the opposition defence.West ham are ready to pay and hence we should demand more from them.We can then use the money from his sale on far better players.Given the same seasons, time and chances a lot of average strikers can do better than what he did.This is because Arsenal create a lot of chances and it just needs someone who can finish.Goodbye!.

We didn't need a manager this season if we're just gonna put out the same players that come 5th anyone could of done what wenger is doing it's easy I buy lacazette then put he same team out from the same squad even when I have injuries it's easy just put out the rest of the squad and play them out of position I mean I'd take 8mil to do that oxlade at lwb kolansinac at cb elneny cm holding rcb there's no work of a manager there just put in players were others ain't ready to play then buy nobody else and do interviews with the same excuses job done next game change some ppl around but same ppl that came 5th then sell Alexis do interviews same excuses job done transfer window closes fans wish they never supported arsenal wenger laughing to the bank job done

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

Stupidly rigid 70th minute subs, rather than as the game warrants; ludicrous playing of players in wrong positions, for which he is notorious; catastrophic ingnorance of the vital need for attack / defence BALANCE, with never two fullbacks up at same time; inability to motivate players to fight, inability to keep them fit, stupid loyalty to long term hospital cases like Diaby and much more besides, too long to list on here.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Unfortunately those with Inter Milan tickets will be unable to double up and watch the other Milan game as both teams never play on the same weekend at home.

The financial arguments for keeping him are well laid out in the article above and LFC would still be able to take the same benefits as outlined by Andy Wales even if he never plays another first team game for LFC.

Lawrence Cohen of Playful Parenting, a favorite author of mine, talks about the approach of joining kids in aggressive play so that you can figure out what's going on underneath and connect with them around it, and the harm of dismissing / denying it, and I never thought about applying the same thought to video games.

Tests revealed avid gamers have the same level of empathy as people who've never played violent video games.

There's just so much variety within the maps, items, and skills, that it's never the same game twice, and with it's perma - death (if you're playing it right;p) it always keeps you on your toes even when you are nearly sure you've reached that godly state, you open the door and a named monster has you running for your life.

having plasmids and guns out at the same time is exactly what this game needed, and the weapons have never been more fun to play with.

While Riptide banks on you having loved the first, in actuality you have a lot more to gain if you've never touched it... If you played the first game, however, I'd recommend waiting for a real sequel, because Riptide fails to get away with pulling the same trick twice.

Let's go way back to 2001, the same year that Devil May Cry flourished hardcore gamers everywhere, the original XBOX releases Steel Battalion and it is one of those tank games you've never played or haven't owned.

It adds a little bit of variety to the game but because you're playing the same songs over and over, it never really feels like it's doing enough to really make these missions feel special.

The same goes for the armor - clad Teutonic princess, Hilde; her character profile on the Soul Calibur V site claims that she's now the mother of two children, but you'd never know that from playing the actual game.

If you never played it, I highly recommend the game, it would have the same reputation as Gunstar Heroes if it released 10 years earlier.

I very rarely watch a film twice, I never read a book more than once, and unless it's to pick up a couple of super easy achievements, I'll never ever play through the same story campaign in a blockbusting AAA game once those credits have rolled.

Most people will probably end up recruiting a slime knight, a faithful companion from the time it joined all the way to the final boss fight, but the immense freedom and luck involved in the monster recruiting means that the game will probably never be played the same way twice.

A game like Uncharted is never going to demo well because it plays the same way each time.

But while the game uses the same basic user interface and mission structure, I never really felt like I was playing a Warriors game.

WATCHING a game is never the same as playing it.

Actually thinking back on this game it was more like playing a tech demo with a couple of things to do thrown in but ends up feeling like the same things are just being repeated on the planets and the big battles in space never happened just saw the same large ship sitting pretty much doing nothing every time I jumped to another system.

Krib You say people are rebuying the same games they already own by buying the «remasters» yet you yourself bought TLoU Remastered, Crash N Sane Trilogy, SotC Remake, and you will buy Spyro Remastered because you never played the originals.

Sure, it's nice to be confident that a game is going to be good ahead of time and then to have your assumptions justified once you finally play it, but that never manages to capture the same sense of elation as a game coming out of nowhere and blowing you away can.

whoever says sh1t like this clearly never spent hours playing games like Socom or Warhawk online, the communities are huge, and those are games with years on the market Valve used to be a great developer, they made Half Life and then took 6 years to release the sequel until they were sure it was a masterpiece and it was now that they're on MS payroll they put out a game that uses a 4 year old engine that looks it could run on Wii and 1 year later they come up with the sequel the first left 4 dead is a good game but no masterpiece and they take only 1 year and do a sequel that looks about the same?

Dokapon Kingdom promises «never the same game twice,» with numerous battles, magic spells, mini-games and multiple playing modes to add replay value.

being a old school gamer you seen them all you played them all.gaming will never be the same as the 80's -90's those were good years to be gaming.

I never played Mass Effect before... Same for the Metro games.

That feeling of being overwhelmed never quite reached those same heights as the game progressed, but the sensation of vulnerability stuck with me — I wasn't playing a heavily armored super-soldier with a laser - guided energy rifle, I was playing a scared 19 year - old kid in wool combat fatigues and a M1 Garand rifle.

If you've played co-op games before, then I assume you feel the same thing I do when playing with someone who never waits for you and / or who grabs all the rewards: frustration.

Controlling Thora feels as intuitive as ever when playing in portable mode and I never felt like I couldn't pull off the same slick manoeuvres I had on previous versions of the game.

We've had entire universes generated from equations and algorithms in No Man's Sky and almost every game comes with the strap line «never play the same way twice» or «different for every player».

This means that players will be able to master the different segments as they play the game, but their time with the game will never be the same.

The levels were as interesting as any other Halo campaign but due to the better graphics and the ability to climb up a ledge rather than having to jump above it's height it made it great to explore for skulls and collectables, within the 9 hour co-op game both myself and Russ found ourselves venturing off and climbing up different parts of the maps to see how high we could get or what was hidden away, we came across a few Easter eggs on the way and found some rare or «special» weapons, Halo has always been a FPS which you have to explore to find Easter eggs etc. but Halo 5 just seemed better than the rest for this, the game flowed well between each level bouncing from blue team and team Osiris following the story to show where paths cross and what each team is doing in between, I feel like all of the trailers kind of pointed the story into a different direction to the way the campaign developed which was surprising and confusing at the same time but none the less it was a great campaign and one of the best Halo games I have played in many years, I was never a fan of Halo 4 I thought it lacked everything a Halo game should be but Halo 5 has surprised me and was well worth the wait.

I have had it a year and never play it because i'm tired of the same things over and over again... why can't the switch run 3ds games?

One cool feature is that every time you play the game, the world changes a little bit so it's never quite the same each time.

As soon as I started playing Double Dragon 4 it almost felt like I never left... and then it hit me, it almost felt like I didn't leave, it never changed, it is still the same game.

It's still Big Boss... You can have the same character but with someone voicing the part... If you don't buy this game because someone's voice isn't it, you're not just a baby but an idiot... I hope you never play games again and I hope your kids hate your favorite movies.

I never buy the same game twice and the option is there for anyone who hasn't played the original.

If you never played it, I highly recommend the game, it would have the same reputation as Gunstar Heroes if it released 10 years earlier.

It's like it never existed, and MS would prefer this notion that X1X is more next gen, and will get tremendous support with enhanced games to divert away from the fact that they're the same games you can play on the X1 / S, PS4, and PS4P, and while they may not look as good, they're probably going to look fine for the vast majority of people.

A game never plays the same way the same time... there's often an added non-linear challenge to create a score that feels natural and can adapt to the game itself.