Sentences with phrase «never saw any evidence of»

I have never seen any evidence of a god, but I am open to listen to real evidence.

I know I have never seen any evidence of any God or anything supernatural which leads me to believe none exists.

I have never seen evidence of that and want to be sure that we keep information accurate here.

While Caputo says he never saw any evidence of collusion with Russia during his work on the campaign, he says the special counsel knows more about the campaign than he did.

As such, you would never see evidence of those vents by vertical temperature sampling unless you sampled right on top of one... and with a total of six samples over a century in an area of 231,000 square km...

I've never seen any evidence of ipcc under estimation.

And you are wrong — I have never seen any evidence of the arts reaching out to introduce culture to science students.

I never saw any evidence of mold as a result, but we had a leaky house, so the ventilation appeared to deter growth.

«I have never, never seen any evidence of Nigella taking any drug whatsoever.

Not exact matches

«The evidence that I have seen is that jobs are in fact increased because there is economic activity increased and because people have a little bit of spare money, which on $ 11 an hour you never have.»

If you could produce the evidence (remember your request above... verifiable evidence), you would create a string of followers never before seen in history.

Without the use of religion you'd have no reason to deny the evidence but as long as you have that book that you require to get by in this world, you will never see the facts for what they are.

Casey, I think the best evidence God doesn't condemn gay people is when Christ met the Roman Centurion and said of him, Never have I seen faith great than this.

So maybe forehead had a point at some issues AW simply ruin some players» careers my evidence is Podolski, this guy can score goals he never misses three chances his left foot is a real killer but leProf cant use him the guy is not a winger (why not try OG12 as a winger and see what he can do), he cant find a way to get a lot from this guy he NEVER give him a lot of second chances einever misses three chances his left foot is a real killer but leProf cant use him the guy is not a winger (why not try OG12 as a winger and see what he can do), he cant find a way to get a lot from this guy he NEVER give him a lot of second chances eiNEVER give him a lot of second chances either.

I have never seen a study claiming evidence that a unit or two of alcohol caused FAS.

«What you see here today - not only here at Buffalo Creek, Niagara Falls, Salamanca and throughout the region - is evidence of what has happened because of the Seneca people and the fact that we never left and because the Seneca Nation never gave up and because the Seneca Nation is committed to our home and our neighbors.»

Evwiehor also testified Tuesday said he never saw «evidence of any kind» that Linda Mangano worked at the restaurant.

In giving her judgment in the case, Her Lordship Barbara Ackah - Yensu pointed out that: «I find both 2nd and 3rd defendants, particularly Catherine Afeku, not to be credible witness and they mounted the witness box to tell the Court a pack of lies, and it is for this reason that I preferred the evidence of plaintiff that she never saw the company's regulations».

I'm just starting to go through the filings now, but so far I see no evidence of the former governor making any donations - but with Spitzer, who knows the mischief - making power that a contribution would contain, one never knows.

Kaitlin Drollette will never forget when she started testing evidence last year in one of the biggest drug busts the region has seen in decades.

These results suggested that clear evidence of the Penrose process might never be seen from a supermassive black hole.

I have never heard of many of these «experts» and see remarkably little evidence to support their assertions.

Such evidence of trepanation has never been seen on animals before.

Working with David Coulter, Charles Kilpatrick, and Ryan Foley of UC Santa Cruz, the team began combing the sky at nightfall for evidence of a never - before - seen collision of neutron stars.

Based on the evidence available, I can certainly see the importance of exercising caution with consuming FCLO until we have more information, but do not think the report alone is enough evidence to never take FCLO again unless we receive further verification.

I haven't seen any evidence for this but I would bet, given the similarity of ozone and UV therapy, that there's a mitochondrial effect from it, but I've never seen that.

He does not comment on adult doses but I have never seen any evidence that adults require more fat - soluble vitamins or more essential fatty acids than children do, and in the case of essential fatty acids the cases is quite certainly the opposite, that their requirement is significant for children but extremely low to the point of infinitesimal for the adult except in certain disease states, during periods of growth (bodybuilding) or tissue repair (after injury or sickness) or during pregnancy and lactation.

I have heard this claim made in several contexts, but have never seen a reference to any evidence of this or an explanation of the mechanism by which this could occur.

But while it contains some never - before - seen footage of Nick Nolte's audition (who was ultimately never cast in the film), there's no video or photographic evidence of Harvey Keitel's two - week stint as Willard before he was replaced by Martin Sheen.

Basically, we don't know exactly what this is, except another piece of evidence for the rogue Rogue One cut that we'll never see.

I never saw it myself, but the common complaints were a dirty source print and too much black crush, neither of which are in evidence on the new disc, whose 1.78:1, 1080p presentation is the best this movie could hope to look without scrubbing all the lo - fi»80s charm out of the image.

For this Never thing to work for fiction publishers the demographics have to be right, and I see no evidence that the form, if we discount the odd phenomena of Fifty Shades (perhaps itself a pointer to a future?)

The interesting thing is to see that a.) None provide any credentials proving their methods are better; b.) they don't like the tone of the article — then again, a lot of people, when all they do is talk among those who only agree with them get offended when they run across someone that isn't in lock step with them; c.) they try to attack me personally, as a «hater», which is totally unfair and judgmental about someone whom they have never met; d.) can't point to any specific dogs with significant accomplishments that have been clicker trained — hunting, police, obedience, tracking, etc... and just finding a specimen or two isn't very convincing evidence... get enough dogs and sometimes you'll find the genius dog that almost trains itself; e.) there is no point by point refutation of what I've said, supported by third party evidence.

Describing the sensation one gets from viewing Larsen's work, John Yau writes «it's as if we have never seen anything like them before... Seeing becomes a kind of detective work, searching for clues while sorting through the visual evidence.

Many media outlets see this as evidence to previously held suspicions that McIver is not a real person, since the majority of McIver's social media content was created after she was blammed for the embarrassment, and she's never actually appeared in public.

I have literally never seen one even attempt to deal with the totality of evidence.

However, I've never seen a single media article in any U.S. press outlet that covered these issues — the large - scale evidence for global warming (melting glaciers, warming poles, shrinking sea ice, ocean temperatures) to the local scale (more intense hurricanes, more intense precipitation, more frequent droughts and heat waves) while also discussing the real causes (fossil fuels and deforestation) and the real solutions (replacement of fossil fuels with renewables, limiting deforestation, and halting the use of fossil fuels, especially coal and oil.)

Deniers constantly say things like this and yet I myself never see any real evidence of it... and I myself don't live only in the sealed off echo chamber of the denial blog world.]

As we saw in the March 21 courtroom tutorial hearing, the judge was not impressed with one of the main bits of accusatory evidence about the «conspiracy,» and the one Chevron attorney speaking at the hearing, Theodore Boutrous, had never seen the plaintiffs» «conspiracy evidence» before — which could actually undermine other lawsuits against energy companies.

Interesting that I so often read this kind of alarmism at «skeptical» climate blogs, but never see an evidence - based approach to quantifying this supposed loss of freedom.

But, if I had never seen any evidence that you existed, except for the urgings of a third party in priestly robes, I would not know whether or not you had disappeared, would I?

And you show no concern whatsoever that this famous bit of «smoking gun» evidence is literally never seen in any accusers» books, magazine articles, PPT presentations, or web sites that rely on it as proof for their accusation that skeptic scientists are untrustworthy?

I've never seen an after the fact score keeping and those who proudly forecast seemingly should show evidence of their past results.

``... And you show no concern whatsoever that this famous bit of «smoking gun» evidence is never seen in any accuser's books, magazine qrticles, PPT presentations or websites that RELY ON IT AS PROOF for their accusation that skeptic scientists are untrustworthy?»

steven you write «You will never see the «evidence» of the «cause» in a plot of temperature versus time.

The fact that the oceans — and not the land — were so warm last year should deeply worry us... There's evidence the Earth's oceans are undergoing never - before - seen change... When you couple 2014's record - setting oceans with our ever - increasing greenhouse gas emissions, it portends an ominous surge of heat globally — on both land and in the oceans — for years to come.

I have seen increased evidence of activities such as phishing, spoofing, faux lottery schemes, and calls asking for renewals of directories never previously purchased, as well as the ever popular grabbing of company logos from websites and using them on letters to defraud people out of money in their bank accounts.

Seeing how much of a ruckus the «birthers» were able to raise over Obama's birthplace by suspecting him to be born out of the U.S. against evidence, actually being born outside of the U.S. is going to be a problem for Cruz, never mind the actual legal situation.

This can be intuited by the evidence the jury never saw, either by suppression from bad searches, by the exclusion of witness testimony due to procedural rules like hearsay, privilege, etc., and other forms of keeping relevant evidence from the jury to protect the rights of the accused.

For anecdotal evidence that «the hiring committee never sees applications when the cover letter contains grammatical errors,» see Susan McClellan & Constance Krontz, Improving Legal Writing Courses: Perspectives from the Bar and Bench, 8 Legal Writing 201, 214 (2002), and Matthew Arnold, The Lack of Basic Writing Skills and Its Impact on the Legal Profession, 24 Cap.