Sentences with phrase «never see comments»

Why do I never see comments like «Oh, thanks for an honest title» on the other 96 %???
I never saw your comment «starting «That is a fair questions...» on my I phone — Instead, I only saw, «You need to not try to speak for me.»
In the first place, I've been countlessly abused here and I never saw ur comment shoving their's aside as moderation.
Thanks — maybe you posted it a second time already — but I never saw the comment.
I never saw this comment until now.
I never saw this comment until now.
I know that you may never see this comment, but I just wanted to ask where you guys are in the adoption process now?

Not exact matches

I've served as a leader in business and studied leadership for decades, and I've never seen someone make such an outlandish, impractical, and downright persecutory comment before.
In a statement, the Foundation said it should have been more transparent, but added that it can't «comment on events that allegedly occurred 60 years ago, and on documents we have never seen
On Bloomberg television last week, James B. Lockhart III, the former head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Fannie and Freddie's regulator) commented on the bailout funds already provided to Fannie and Freddie, saying «Most of that money will never be seen again.
It never ceases to amaze me how many people in blog comments, on forums etc, see bonds as a 100 % nailed - on appalling investment over the next coming years without any trace of humility.
Set forth below is the text of a comment that I recently posted to the discussion thread for another blog entry at this site: «But there has also never in the history of the market been a time when we went to a P / E10 level in the 30s and did not see a price crash of 50 percent to 65 percent» And there have never been two such crashes less than 80 years apart.
To those who look at the world and say «see how old it is, therefore God does not exist because the bible states that it is only 6 - 10 thousand years old» you may never get this comment.
I've seen plenty of messed up comments after articles but never has someone been so totally and utterly wrong... I pray you'll grant sight and wisdom soon.
A comment that stays with me from many years ago, when I first encountered contemplative prayer on a visit to a Carmelite monastery, is a friend's observation that none of us can know how much of what God is doing in the world is brought about in response to the prayers of people we don't know and never see.
Wendy: I never saw the nasty name comment (I can't do more than skim the vitriol on here at the best of times).
I am reading your newest posts to your oldest.I have never been to bible school but I consider myself in the journey of education concerning the bible.more than any opinions that you have what concerns me most is how «brothers and sisters» through their comments responds to someone who thinks differently from what is perceived as absolutes (not sure if that's the right term) in scripture.I wonder did the apostle believe half the things that are seen as church doctirine today?how did the disciples who did not have the new testament or the ability to read follow Jesus?I appreciate your questioning.In my experience we are too quick to try and fix someone or use the scriptures as a control mechanism and to slow to practise empathy and love..
Jeremy thanks for your comments alot of this i never really thought about before until you provoked me to seek the truth in the word it is what we all should be doing finding the truth for ourselves God wants to reveal mysterys if we are open to hear.If we have been christians awhile we just take the word of whoevers preaching or whichever clip we see on god tube its knowledge but not revelation.Because the story sounds plausible we tag that on to our belief for example for many years i believed that the rich young rulers problem was money so the way to deal with that problem is to give it away and be a follower of Jesus sounds plausible.Till you realise every believers situation is different so the message has to be universal.So the reason its not about money because it excludes those that do nt have it and does nt make room for those that do have it but do nt worship it.The rich young ruler was not a bad person he lived by a good moral code but he made money his idol he put that before God.The word says we shall not have any idols thats a sin and a wicked one.In fact there wasnt any room in his heart for Jesus that is a tragedy.So when we see the message is about Idolatry we all have areas that we chose not to submit to God thats universal everyone of us whether we are rich or poor.I believe we are unaware that we have these idols what are some of them that was revealed to me our partners our children our work our church our family i can sense some of you are getting fidgetty.
I have never seen an atheists post loving comments on any religious blogs.
I saw an anwer to my entry that «a bigot is a bigot, even if you are a «Christian», his comment basically was that it is ok to be a bigot even if you claim to be a «Christian», well I agree that most are bigots, I just don't think it fits the description of «Christian», I could never be part of any organized religion as their members ar 99.5 % hypocrits.
A comment comes to mind that is attributed to W. H. Auden on a visit to America: «I never saw so many happy people and so many unhappy marriages.»
I never said you had to adopt my interpretation of the truth, I merely said someone who holds to Barth's view of interpretation relinquishes his / her right to critique someone else's interpretation (See naked pastor's comments on Barth on Nov. 26).
Flo made a comment about recipe originality in respect to gluten free recipe development — how she has seen people take something that never had gluten in it to begin with, such as an omelette, and claim it as a grand new GF invention.
I've never seen so many comments on a blog, I love it!
It is great to read through all the comments and see so many I agree 100 % with — longtime reader of your blog but have never commented, happy to see your familiar kitchen counter figure prominently on the covers of your book... all my most popular recipes come from your blog, they're the perfect combo of being easy to make and yet still sophisticated and wonderful.
I've read your blog for years and years but have never commented, but I have to tell you I love your cookbook and can plainly see how much hard work went into it.
I never comment, but just have to chime in with how much we're loving the book here, and I'm looking forward to seeing you on tour (I've already reserved my seat!).
Fiorina says, «People have commented that they've never seen the farm look so good, so that's encouraging.»
After reading all the positive comments I can't believe I never saw this one or made it before.
I've never posted a comment before but I had to after seeing this recipe, I have to day I love those oh so bad for you totinos pizza rolls, now I can make these and never look back, I imagine you could freeze them for later cooking?
I've never seen brownish swirls before however, so I can't comment on that.
I see that my response I typed in on my phone never made it here to the actual comments!
LOL, OMG I have never seen so many comments on one post!
I would add to your comment on the last line, that it is up to us all to force those scum out by boycotting games and merchandise and by a social media campaign - to quote the deranged Trump - «the fire and fury of which the world has never before seen»
if i am correct @ SD... your analysis shows you see the forest for the trees, most comments just give their opinion like they are playing Championship manager - as JT said coquelin has helped slightly fix the problem of the overexposure of our defence to counter attacks and the full backs don't both bomb forward as much, the reason monreal starts ahead of Gibbs - walcott always looks lost and confused now when he makes appearances, and never wants to create or get too involved in build up play just wants to run into the middle and get on the end of balls.
(2) somewhat linked to the previous comment in that we never seem to be prepared to hit the ground running with our best potential lineup come opening day... it's become so common, in recent years, that many fans actually hope we stumble a little in the first couple games just so it forces Wenger to bring in reinforcements... unfortunately this can be problematic, thus one of the most common phrases associated with Wenger, «panic buy»... this situation is also negatively impacted by the ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the summer months... right now I'm watching the Super Cup and not a single player is unavailable to either manager, including Ronaldo, yet somehow we have a list of players half a mile long that haven't seen game - time so far this preseason... I can only assume this is a reactionary policy created due to the multitude of injuries this club has faced over the years... just another sign of the fragility that permeates this club
Third Man, You and I and fair minded fans know it, but those «one eyed see no wrong with Wenger» fans will never accept your totally true comment.
Responding to your earlier comment — I'll admit, I haven't seen Morata play much (maybe 20 times maximum), but I've never seen anything special in him at all.
I've never seen anything like these comments before.
I would like to tell arsenal fan that the transfer window is not arsenal's problem.Let explain what is in my mind.We need to reinforce our team but we need to think in the future that most of the high class players are going to refuse signing for arsenal fc because of Mr Wenger's philosophy.It looks like arsenal becomes cemetery of players.How many players came in and left because of performance, became good players out of arsenal.We need to accept all of the transformation Mr wenger brings in arsenal but now it does not work.Why??? because lack of tactics, strategies and pretending best players for Mr wenger mind but in reality those players do not get standard of best player.Mr wenger wants to prove everybody that he is wright that players who are calling by wenger are best.I means Mr wenger is the only one can see all matter in good position or bad.He is wrong by thinking this way.He does not like criticism.he is the mind of arsenal.Everything he can say or defend is wright.Think about morrinho comments about arsenal!!!! Why he likes to be arsenal coach!!!! One thing I want to say about arsenal players, I think everybody watch arsenal games.We have got short mind players who play two good games and the rest shameless.They are working hard in the training ground for catching Mr wenger's mind to let them play; what is behind their (players) mind to be the most regular players.Those players have no vision even ambition; they are never becoming high class and their carriers are going to finish in arsenal after arsenal we are going to see them playing for championship.They do not care to become legend as Ian wright, Vierra, Berckam, piress, Henry... What is the big behind their mind to use wenger name to be selected in national team.They are not able to face different leagues in the world.
I'll probably get loads of thumbs down because of my comments but until I see some major changes in the way we line up and go about our footballing business, I'll never expect anything more than just being a top four premiership side which turns up for the champions league every year that has no hope of winning either.
I read transfer stories and comments here throughout the transfer window but never saw Mahrez being mentioned as a player Arsenal should buy.
It surprises me that fans still refuse to see it as it is, given our lack of success since he's arrived, and his recent comment of «if you want to win championships then you would never get involved».
Listen there are some facts people wont accept but its true.Listen i have said it here and i stand by my comments Ospina is not part of arsenal's futute he wont last long term because he is not good enough at the most important thing shot stopping.He is ok but will never be world class at that.What people do nt know is that Szcz and Ospina have already developed.Szcz shot stopping is up there with the best keepers but mistakes and some stupid exposing has not allowed him to grab the first choice.I do nt judge a player by one match i make sure i watch and analyze them.I cant see Ospina being arsenal number one for 5 years.He does not have what it takes.As Roma should have made Szcz deal permanent after all he is useless ai nt he?
That comment has nothing to do with the article but never have I seen you complain.
God, I hope the WEED actually reads this comment, just so he can see how many people want him gone, never to darken our doors again.
Respect me as an arsenal season ticket holder.I know 99 % of the cry babies here have never seen the emarates live, fans who do nt buy Match tickets how do they claim to support the club may be through good will.@ADMIN you hide some of our comments when we criticise the club positively yet you have space to quote the metro and other unreliable sources to make a point.No titles no progress
What a good comment to Andrew Elder, hope all fans can open their brains and see the differences, Ozil ever been criticized for everything, the stats will never lie the boy contribute alot to the team why is he playing for German squard if he is not good enough?
I'm going to immediately snuff this out seeing as your comment sounds like you've never really played the game.
I honestly feel sorry for Hector Bellerin as he's the only player playing on the right hand side, whether that's in attack or defense, but after his comments about the «true» fans who never criticize the club, I won't be too sad to see him leave.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z