Sentences with phrase «never see the fact»

Without the use of religion you'd have no reason to deny the evidence but as long as you have that book that you require to get by in this world, you will never see the facts for what they are.

Rush's legacy when he leaves this plane of existence will be hatred for those not like him... old, fat, white, male..., his inability to get the facts right... Rush has never seen a fact that he couldn't spin into something totally unrecognizable.

Not exact matches

So insane, in fact, that it was # 1 on Sportscenter's Top 10 Plays during a part of the year when hockey highlights are almost never seen.

In fact, the average reader spends fewer than 15 seconds on a page before clicking away, meaning most would never see the button, much less engage with it.

In fact, when you line up Ryan against his direct opponent, Vice President Joe Biden, you can see two versions of the same person — at least in that they both came to Washington in their 20s, were elected to office far younger than their peers, and never left.

«The evidence that I have seen is that jobs are in fact increased because there is economic activity increased and because people have a little bit of spare money, which on $ 11 an hour you never have.»

Ben Luckock is in fact so bullish that he forecast demand could exceed supply of crude oil by 2 - 4 million bpd by the end of 2019 because of the US$ 1 - trillion in spending plans that never saw the light of day as a result of the 2014 price crash.

Q: Bill Gross, the head of PIMCO, says we'll never see those kinds of double - digit returns again; in fact, he's not sure we'll even see high single digits.

Sensor Tower's App Intelligence data revealed some never - before - seen facts.

Adding to the financing challenge is the fact that other pieces of the lithium supply chain have never seen this type of stress or requirement for investment.

That ignores the fact that most startups will never see a venture capital dime, overlooking the lion's share of firms currently in operation.

Luckily, my children have never seen the large amount of contradictory facts that have existed, been discussed and taught in this country for the last 200 + years — including during those morally - superior 1950s.

I can't quite get around the fact that Paul sometimes refers to the Holy Spirit as «the Spirit of Christ», and I've never been able to see how evangelicals and other orthodox Christians can substantiate their claim that Jesus was pre-incarnate.

In fact, those who understand it will see the event in its present context immediately following the first prediction of the passion and Peter's confession of that which never comes by observation of flesh and blood but only by revelation (16:17).

Actually, this is a perfect example of appearing the suffering dad who never sees his kids when in fact its Tuesday over nights and every other weekend.

After a half - dozen sessions, the assessment pinpointed these behavior difficulties which became the goals of therapy — her unassertiveness; her inability to express her feelings, which the therapist saw as leading to a build - up of anger, resentment, and guilt (about her anger); the fact that she had never experienced orgasm; and her low opinion of

The teaching that men are to be the «spiritual leaders» of their homes is found nowhere in Scripture, and yet I — along with far too many young evangelical women — spent hours upon hours fretting over this in college, worrying I'd never find a guy who was more knowledgeable about the Bible than I, who was always more emotionally connected to God than I, who was better at leading in the church than I, and who consistently exhibited more faithfulness and wisdom than I. (In fact, under this paradigm, I came to see many of my gifts as liabilities, impediments to settling down with a good «spiritual leader»!)

It has also, most unfortunately, been very badly translated, so much so that it is advisable never to quote the ET as giving Bultmann «s opinion on a matter without first checking the German to see that Bultdid, in fact, say whatever it is the ET says he said.

It is never possible to see what act of man does in fact fulfil the will of God.

So when the Second Vatican Council said that «The hour is coming, in fact has come, when the vocation of women is being acknowledged in its fullness, the hour in which women acquire in the world an influence, an effect and a power never hitherto achieved» it was saying something that everyone could see was true, and had important implications.

The book first appeared as a series of articles in the New Yorker and years later, writes Ben Yagoda in Slate, the fact checker reported that «he had never seen such an accurate account and that whatever the fiction veneer, In Cold Blood was a scrupulous non-fiction report.»

Jeremy thanks for your comments alot of this i never really thought about before until you provoked me to seek the truth in the word it is what we all should be doing finding the truth for ourselves God wants to reveal mysterys if we are open to hear.If we have been christians awhile we just take the word of whoevers preaching or whichever clip we see on god tube its knowledge but not revelation.Because the story sounds plausible we tag that on to our belief for example for many years i believed that the rich young rulers problem was money so the way to deal with that problem is to give it away and be a follower of Jesus sounds plausible.Till you realise every believers situation is different so the message has to be universal.So the reason its not about money because it excludes those that do nt have it and does nt make room for those that do have it but do nt worship it.The rich young ruler was not a bad person he lived by a good moral code but he made money his idol he put that before God.The word says we shall not have any idols thats a sin and a wicked one.In fact there wasnt any room in his heart for Jesus that is a tragedy.So when we see the message is about Idolatry we all have areas that we chose not to submit to God thats universal everyone of us whether we are rich or poor.I believe we are unaware that we have these idols what are some of them that was revealed to me our partners our children our work our church our family i can sense some of you are getting fidgetty.

@PUZZLED — well see my issus lies with the fact of how women were treated in ancient times — they were property and so allowing them to go thru all the emotionals and physicals of carrying and then giving birth only to toss it off a cliff isn't what i'd call good parenting — having an abortion for many people who should NEVER have kids is (in my opinion) good parenting!

Lets we forget, there are many ultra smart folks who see the same «indisputable» facts that you see, but know that we can never be sure but can hope and even believe in unseen «things», in ways that help civilization.

But that this obedience and this fellowship always have the character of a «Thou» relation, and can never be reduced to an «It» relation, may be seen from the fact that the tension inherent in the «Thou» relation can not be happily resolved except by submission or fellowship.

Jesus never scolded him for this, in fact he rebuked him for not believing without seeing.

You never see that, one, because you won't believe after the fact stuff, because it's over, and «made up».

Although we may realize — and in the present writer's judgment we must realize — that we shall never be perfect either in deeds or in attitudes on earth, this fact does not nullify the really great achievements that we see in others.

@jf well your information about the New Testament is about as accurate as your Old Testament knowledge, The prophecies of the Old testament concerning Christ could not have been written after the fact because we now have the Dead Sea Scrolls, with an almost complete Old Testament dated 100 - 200 years before the birth of Christ, Your interpretation of God at His worst shows a complete lack of understanding as to what was being communicated.We don't know what the original texts of the New Testament were written in as to date there are no original copies available.Greek was the common language of the day.Most of the gospels were reported written somewhere in the 30 year after Christs resurrection time frame, not the unspecified «long after «you reference and three of the authors knew Jesus personally in His earthly ministry, the other Knew Jesus as his savior and was in the company of many who also knew Jesus.You keep referencing changes, «gazillion «was the word used but you never referenced one change, so it is assumed we are to take your word for it.What may we ask are your credentials?Try reading Job your own self, particularly the section were Job says «My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes»

The messiah concept was never seen as someone that was infallible (fact).

In case Abraham is not a nullity, a phantom, a show one employs for a pastime, then the fault can never consist in the fact that the sinner wants to do likewise, but the point is to see how great a thing it was that Abraham did, in order that man may judge for himself whether he has the call and the courage to be subjected to such a test.

We ought, he said, to know intuitively that we're going to die even if we'd never seen a corpse, never heard of death or anything, by the fact that when we're young we have an open future and we can do this and that and the other thing.

It would be altogether superficial (it would, in fact, be anachronistic) to say «Jesus never asked anyone to believe a creed» (that, as a matter of fact, although often said, is scarcely true — see Mark 12.28).

And Merleau - Ponty agrees: the chiasmatic reversibility between seeing and the visible, touching and touched, hearing and being heard, is «always imminent and never realized in fact» (VIV 147).

As a retired soldier I do have to say that it is a sorry fact that this person will probably never see the rank of sergeant in his career because of this one act.

The fact is that, in spite of all the criticism against the church as institution, I have never seen a better alternative to a church that really works and does things in a Godly way.

Actually there is no debate between faith believers and atheists because atheists use science and logic and facts, you can see that this can never be debated over fairy tale.

Several times already we have quoted Wesley's fine words about «pure, unbounded love»: never was there a more apt description of the reality of God, although in Wesley's hymn the words are in fact applied to Christ — and appropriately, since in Christ (if Christian faith is right) the «pure, unbounded love» that is seen humanly expressed is the manifestation, reflection, and participation in human terms of the divine Lover whom Jesus called «my Father in heaven.»

In fact, Bryan had been a colonel in the U.S. Army during the Spanish - American War (though he never saw combat).

I never thought I would live to see that day the TRUTH would become the new hate speech and speaking the truth and pointing out facts makes you a racist and a bigot.

I have never tried raw granola before, in fact I didn't even know it was a thing until I started seeing it pop up around blogs!

I'd never heard of Baumkuchen — a traditional German cake baked in layers on a rotating spit in front of a grill, whose final spiraling layers resemble the cross-sectional growth rings of a tree [see how it's done]-- but when I got to the Shichttorte — a layer cake made by baking very thin layers of batter one by one on top each other — I realized that I had in fact bookmarked a similar recipe in a cookbook, probably close to fifteen years ago!

I never avoided her company or got tired of her, and as I matter of fact I always looked forward to seeing her and was excited whenever I was about to do so.

oh dear I am out of touch with films — though I did see twilight some years ago but never was a huge fan — but I am quite au fait with chopping up asparagus finely for a salad — in fact I have given it to sylvia raw at times — though never thought of shaving it.

In fact, you've probably never seen me move so fast!

I really appreciate the fact that you keep an open mind about different lower carb eating plans, and more importantly, I've never seen you really bash «other» diets like some low carb commentators do.

whether for the right or wrong reasons, our leader chose to stay on when things took a turn of sorts... a new owner arrived on the scene, plans for a new stadium emerged and Wenger became the bearer of bad news... he sold us on a new story, one that required patience on our parts... financial constraints were the order of the day, so that the enormous sums spent on the new venue could be recouped... although some would question the validity of such claims, why wouldn't they believe their faithful leader... according to those within the hierarchy, the future never looked so bright, as this new home would ensure our place among the elites for years to come... as we all know now these claims were a well constructed fabrication and so those who feel they were duped in the process are infuriated and rightly so... the fact that this club and it's manager have continually misled the fans, especially following Gazidis's claims about our financial liquidity, simply rubbed more salt in an already gaping wound... this surely isn't how you treat your «family», especially when they supported you through the supposed «lean» years... it was a dirty trick played by Kroenke but the fact is was orchestrated by Wenger himself hurt the most... as for those in the media, many of whom are former players or longtime pundits, who observed the early years firsthand, saw this as the perfect opportunity to vent the anger they felt towards this pretentious man once and for all... all in all, karma's a bitch

See, it is a fact, if you can not make miracles in Europe, you can never win the Champions league!!

The joking answer would be very little, given the «fact» that he can never see what is happening on the pitch from the touchline anyway.

Well every one has his opinion.If you feel Sanchez is a 9 I respect that.I also have my opinion about how I rate him.I've seen many wingers play for Arsenal and I know some who were as good as Sanchez but were never called irreplaceable.Sanchez had far better stats than them yet quality wise they'll always be mentioned and as regarded as Sanchez.What I will never put into to debate about is him being world class.That's a fact no one can deny.