Sentences with phrase «never spoken to these people»

What happens when there are hordes of people who are keen to tell you exactly what you're doing wrong with your children, even if you've never spoken to these people before?

Making a good first impression can be the difference between setting up a date and never speaking to a person again.

While more and more customers today solve service problems or questions over the internet and never speak to a person, the expectations for customer service have nonetheless increased.

Not exact matches

Several people who spoke to CNBC, including developers hired by Fike as well as investors in Giza itself, said they had never seen him.

«We build world - class tech that puts people back in control of their finances, we speak to our customers like humans and we're never afraid to challenge old thinking in order to innovate.»

Historically, the people who did the hiring never even spoke to the people who did the training and development.

This site speaks directly to beginners, making it appropriate for people who have literally never opened an Excel spreadsheet in their life.

People who have been fighting for this for too long, others who were never comfortable enough to openly talk about their experiences with gun violence, or still others who were never listened to when opening up about their experiences with gun violence or were afraid to speak out — these are the people we are fighting with anPeople who have been fighting for this for too long, others who were never comfortable enough to openly talk about their experiences with gun violence, or still others who were never listened to when opening up about their experiences with gun violence or were afraid to speak out — these are the people we are fighting with anpeople we are fighting with and for.

We build world class tech that puts people back in control of their finances, we speak to our customers like humans and we're never afraid to challenge old thinking in order to innovate.»

In that thread to Lymis people talked about how you never know who's reading or what impact your words will have when reflected on in years to come... Well, I * was * that person, and I read and listened quietly, and when I spoke and disagreed, I remembered later what was said in response.

As a retired Pope, he will never be a free person, but kept under hose arrest and supervised, to stop him from speaking truth about college of hindu Mithra ism, racist savior ism, labeled as Christianity to hind fool humanity.

People like Santorum remind me of the Pharasees who were careful to show up in the temple full of pride and self righteous indignation for anyone who dared to question their rigid ideology yet never took one step towards bettering conditions in their society or spoke out against social and economic injustice.

I have sat with people dying, and they never spoke of anything other than their need to connect with their loved ones and family.

Because they want to talk about something real — something that really meant something in their life, not the invisible person in the sky who they never even spoke too.

I believe that man is, by nature, an exile and will never be self - sufficient or complete on this earth; that his chances of happiness and virtue, here, remain more or less constant through the centuries and, generally speaking, are not much affected by the political and economic conditions in which he lives; that the balance of good and ill tends to revert to a norm; that sudden changes of physical condition are usually ill, and are advocated by the wrong people for the wrong reasons; that the intellectual communists of today have personal, irrelevant grounds for their antagonism to society, which they are trying to exploit.

In the bible it never says men have many wives it says clearly one man and one woman becomes one flesh.The bible is speaking of men that had many wives not yourself having wives.Read the bible 1st and translate it properly and don't use it to brainwash people.

You might be a bad person for not speaking out against genocide in Darfur, but you'll never have to worry about infidelity in marriage.

At all times in Israel people spoke much about evil powers, but not about one which, for longer than the purpose of temptation, was allowed to rule in God's stead; never, not even in the most deadly act of requital by God, is the bond of immediacy broken.

Nor can it be wisdom to talk of this eternal element in the same vein as if one were speaking of the past, as if it is past and past in the sense that it can never, not even in repentance, relate itself to a present person but only to an absent one.

There have always been lots of people who knew that the institutional Christianity was not the only way of following Jesus, but those who were in positions of power never gave these people a platform or a pulpit from which to speak.

The Bible never speaks of one going from being a new creature in Christ Jesus back to the old person he was before.

He never made any mistakes and spoke to everyone in parables so that all the people who did not already understand would never be able to understand and would go to hell which they deserved anyway because God had prophesied that «seeing, they would not see, and hearing, they would not hear» and God has to fulfill his prophecies.

And I have never been one who is willing to turn a blind eye to those real problems — a lot of people wish I would speak up less on the problems of evangelicalism.

Jesus spoke to Peter about feeding his sheep, and to his apostles about people who lacked the eyes to see and the ears to hear and how they will never understand his parables even if they try (and, interestingly, he said this as the reason he taught using parables rather than just stating things out explicitly).

You people who quote scripture so freely and think you are the only ones who know it and have the keys to its interpretation and can never possibly be wrong, I ask you this one question, in how many verses of scripture did Jesus speak out against the self - righteous Pharisees and how many against gay people?

A person can disguise the hidden evil in his intentions (perhaps even without being completely aware of it himself) in his verbalizations and utterances, but he can not hide or disguise the spirit behind his utterances, and if it is the Spirit of Christ speaking to the sinner, it can never be disguised or hidden.

Janet i think what you have said is quite insightful and you are right and there is another meaning to Go and sin no more and that speaks to me of repentence making a decision to Follow Christ the one who saves.The words Go and sin no more is referring to a continual ongoinging process of living for Christ rather than dying in our sins daily there is no comparison.I thought that was awesome pointing the law back to all of us for we all have sinned and the judgement is death but Jesus came that we might have life in its fullness.Many people only see the adulterer when she portrays who we are as sinners that he came to save all of us sin is sin and the punishment is death so again you are quite right people use the scriptures to judge and that was never Jesus intention.I hope that helps when someone uses that scripture incorrectly and you can you use it like Jesus did to point it back at those who judge i hope that helps.brentnz

Thus the spectacle of persons in Stalin's Russia willingly confessing deeds or words they never committed or spoke, not out of guilt or masochism but out of loyalty to the necessities of the movement's logic which has called for a certain kind of crime to be committed and confessed at a particular point in history.

I was invited to speak to faith communities that displayed a crazy blend of evangelical fervor and progressive inclusivism, that included a diverse group of people politically, theologically, and socially, and that loved one another like I've never seen before.

To the world I say stop hating each other and do good help those in need, feed people who are hungry, do good to all you meet, Jesus never spoke out against any one except to the religious people at that time and it is not any different noTo the world I say stop hating each other and do good help those in need, feed people who are hungry, do good to all you meet, Jesus never spoke out against any one except to the religious people at that time and it is not any different noto all you meet, Jesus never spoke out against any one except to the religious people at that time and it is not any different noto the religious people at that time and it is not any different now!

Another person — who never speaks in church — revealed how bothered she is by her inability to influence people at her workplace toward making their lives more Christian.

But never would we speak aloud of an issue and link it to a current activity within the nation and then mobilize people around it.»

Such models are never accepted passively, or even just as they are, but one ought to speak more of the seepage of such models into the consciousness and expression of the people, very often in spite of active or resigned resistance.

Today as never before the Church is equipped to address same - sex issues in the first person, to speak of same - sex attraction in terms of «I» rather than «you.»

It must be maddening to see people smile at you but know deep down that they would never speak to you again because you willingly engage in disgusting behavior

======= @tallulah13 «The bible contradicts itself hundreds of times, and in fact, the bulk of the new testament was written by a man who never even met the person for whom he claims to speak.»

My mother watches these shows and she feels that God blesses her for giving money to these greedy people who WILL NEVER sit by her bedside while she is sick or after having a major operation — or even to speak with her or pray with her when she wants to pray with someone.

God could had it been both ways is possible for him... created of all livings from chemicals to full creatures... in the book if looked so simple is because God message was to people with less knowldge premitive whether in the east or west... and had to be in simple examples but that might hold big meanings in today's knowldge and facilities... about mankind God created at it's best, but never in the Quran it was stated that men had been given his (God's) looks... God told us that all creatures are nations like us, which means they were created in the same way... although God as well spoke of integration of mankind and well as animals in cross marriages that made variable nations...

God could had creation either ways is possible for him... created of all livings from chemicals to full creatures... in the book if looked so simple is because God message was to people with less knowldge premitive whether in the east or west... and had to be in simple examples but that might hold big meanings in today's knowldge and facilities... about mankind God created at it's best, but never in the Quran it was stated that men had been given his (God's) looks... God told us that all creatures are nations like us, which means they were created in the same way... although God as well spoke of integration of mankind and well as animals in cross marriages that made variable nations...

There we go again, shut up this hypocritical rightwingers.Only at election time do rear their ugly heads up to be seen and heard.It's time to unleash the CRACKKIN, the monster that the IRS people use on unruly religious groups, exemption is like a death sentence to these groups.Most of these religious leaders are wolves in sheeps clothing, selling their political poison to anyone in their flocks.They push the envelope on the seperation of church and state issue, seeing how far they can go.Pastors and ministers would never speak politics like this years ago, that was taaboo.Now people like Robertson, Graham, and the rest, flaunt their ideaology both religious and political at every event.They don't care about the legal consequences, they have LAWYERS, perishioners pay for that.

Now figure out when we hear that voice from the new world messiah who would be speaking from space to all of the sane people of the earth who might give instructions to zealots and religious fanatics, we would see hysteria and social mayhem on a scale never witnessed before on this planet.

I will never believe what you believe and you will not believe what I believe so to you is your religion and to me is mine» (paraphrased Qur «an surah 109 — ironically all those trying to attack Islam are in fact evidence of what Quran says about such people, just by speaking they affirm the true revelation...

The pure science of the theory NEVER says to «imagine» anything, though many scientists speaking to a public not as well versed in science do use metaphor, analogy, and imagined scenarios to help people grasp the concept.

And his efforts to explore these issues always began with and never strayed far from the way religious people actually talk (cf. my forthcoming book Ian Ramsey: To Speak Responsibly of Godto explore these issues always began with and never strayed far from the way religious people actually talk (cf. my forthcoming book Ian Ramsey: To Speak Responsibly of GodTo Speak Responsibly of God).

Spoken like someone who has never had to look for work to support her two kids or pay her rent in an economy where there are at least 200 people applying for every part time, minimum wage job.

Christine, that is a really powerful way to convey that relationship, and one that portrays my relationship not to the bible, but more to the «feeling / knowing / hearing» god... Even at my most believing, I never had the experience of God talking directly to me and telling me what to do, but so many people I knew seemed to have this... I always had my doubts and confusions; the times where I truly felt god or heard god, it was at a deep sensing level... not anyting spoken or any kind of instruction.

These truths are intuitively available to all — and we grasp them precisely in the experience of personal love: When we love a person, it arises from the very centre of our being and freedom, and it is never love of just any human individual, someone who can be swapped - out, so to speak, and replaced with another.

Lucinda van der Hart speaks to a courageous young woman who truly understands that a person should never be valued on their appearance alone.

Never Settle campaign spoke to people,» Clerkin says.

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste