Sentences with phrase «new class action rule»

The amended bill would also repeal a provision of the new class action rule adopted by the state Supreme Court in December.

Not exact matches

The class action, filed in United States District Court, Southern District of New York, and docketed under 18 - cv - 02213, is on behalf of a class consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired BRF American Depositary Receipts («ADRs») between April 4, 2013 and March 2, 2018, both dates inclusive (the «Class Period»), seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants» violations of the federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the «Exchange Act») and Rule 10b - 5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain of its top officclass action, filed in United States District Court, Southern District of New York, and docketed under 18 - cv - 02213, is on behalf of a class consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired BRF American Depositary Receipts («ADRs») between April 4, 2013 and March 2, 2018, both dates inclusive (the «Class Period»), seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants» violations of the federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the «Exchange Act») and Rule 10b - 5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain of its top officclass consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired BRF American Depositary Receipts («ADRs») between April 4, 2013 and March 2, 2018, both dates inclusive (the «Class Period»), seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants» violations of the federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the «Exchange Act») and Rule 10b - 5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain of its top officClass Period»), seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants» violations of the federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the «Exchange Act») and Rule 10b - 5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain of its top officials.

A U.S. consumer watchdog on Thursday proposed new rules to block credit card companies, banks, and other companies from forcing customers to waive their rights to join class action lawsuits and only settle disputes through arbitration.

Earlier this year, the CFPB issued a new rule to make it easier to mount a class action against banks and financial institutions by banning forced arbitration.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced a new rule Monday that makes it easier for groups of consumers to band together to form and join class - action lawsuits.

The announcement was made in court papers filed recently, as part of the ongoing remedy process stemming from the federal class action lawsuit, Floyd vs. City of New York, in which a judge ruled the police unfairly targeted people of color for stops.

This is part of the ongoing remedy process stemming from the federal class action lawsuit, Floyd vs. City of New York, in which a judge ruled the police unfairly targeted people of color for stops.

Curiel said at the end of an hour - long hearing that he would rule at a later time on final approval to settle two class - action lawsuits before him and a civil lawsuit by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman.

Last week, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal, which is located in Louisiana, ruled in favor of a class action lawsuit brought on behalf of about 7000 New Orleans public school employees who were wrongfully terminated when the State of Louisiana took control of 107 New Orleans public schools following Hurricane Katrina.

Following the July 1, 2015 ruling by Judge Denise Cote denying plaintiffs» motion for class certification in Simmons v. Author Solutions LLC, the parties have resolved both the New York and Indiana actions without any finding or admission of wrongdoing on the part of Author Solutions or its affiliates.

The ruling heightens the risk, particularly for credit counseling agencies doing business in the First Circuit (encompassing Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Puerto Rico, and Rhode Island), that their activities, especially their DMPs and less - than - full balance repayment programs, may trigger coverage under CROA and give rise to class action litigation, forcing them — at great expense — to prove that they are actually operating as bona fide nonprofit organizations (in order to be exempt from CROA, particularly for what has transpired in the past), or, alternatively, to comply with CROA's requirements prospectively.

The new tort of intrusion upon seclusion has been «implicitly» recognized in Nova Scotia, according to a ruling in a medical records privacy breach class action that challenged its existence in that province.

In July of 2015, an institutional investor with a substantial stake in MDC's common shares commenced a proposed securities class action against MDC and certain of its officers under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Securities and Exchange Commission («SEC») Rule 10b - 5 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the «U.S. Securities Class Action&raqclass action against MDC and certain of its officers under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Securities and Exchange Commission («SEC») Rule 10b - 5 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the «U.S. Securities Class Action&raaction against MDC and certain of its officers under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Securities and Exchange Commission («SEC») Rule 10b - 5 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the «U.S. Securities Class Action&raqClass Action&raAction»).

The Global Class Actions Exchange website, which complements the conferences, has empirical data on Australian class actions, and it links to country reports for over 30 countries and regions, and national legislation and rules for Victoria (Australia), Chile, France, Germany, Israel, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Singapore, and SClass Actions Exchange website, which complements the conferences, has empirical data on Australian class actions, and it links to country reports for over 30 countries and regions, and national legislation and rules for Victoria (Australia), Chile, France, Germany, Israel, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Singapore, andActions Exchange website, which complements the conferences, has empirical data on Australian class actions, and it links to country reports for over 30 countries and regions, and national legislation and rules for Victoria (Australia), Chile, France, Germany, Israel, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Singapore, and Sclass actions, and it links to country reports for over 30 countries and regions, and national legislation and rules for Victoria (Australia), Chile, France, Germany, Israel, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Singapore, andactions, and it links to country reports for over 30 countries and regions, and national legislation and rules for Victoria (Australia), Chile, France, Germany, Israel, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Singapore, and Spain.

Today's New York Times editorial («Class Action Lawsuits» on p. A22) voices concern that the Class Action Fairness Act risks changing the rules for class action lawsuits in a way Class Action Lawsuits» on p. A22) voices concern that the Class Action Fairness Act risks changing the rules for class action lawsuits in a wayAction Lawsuits» on p. A22) voices concern that the Class Action Fairness Act risks changing the rules for class action lawsuits in a way Class Action Fairness Act risks changing the rules for class action lawsuits in a wayAction Fairness Act risks changing the rules for class action lawsuits in a way class action lawsuits in a wayaction lawsuits in a way that:

In Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Company, the Supreme Court held that a New York law placing limits on class actions did not preclude a federal district court sitting in diversity from entertaining a class action under Rule 23.

The ruling came in the case Gordon v. Kaleida Health, a contentious wage - and - hour class action against a major regional hospital system, filed in 2008 in the Western District of New York.

The new rule will create more structure around state class action settlements.