I think a better term would be
a new climate paradigm or premise.
Not exact matches
Due to
climate change, she said, the world faces «one of the most daunting crossroads in the evolution of human history, we are at the point where we must decide: are we going to ignore science or are we going to rise to the call of history and forge a
new life on Earth
paradigm... where nature and humanity support each other.»
These papers and similar findings published led to a
paradigm shift in the way models describe SOA formation and evaporation, including a
new treatment of SOA that is currently being implemented in DOE's Accelerated
Climate Model for Energy (ACME).
A
new science
paradigm is one that better explains data — in this case
climate data — than the old theory.
Though «
paradigm shift» emerged as the
new catch - phrase of GCF discourse — as the fund's governing instrument calls for a «
paradigm shift towards low - emission and
climate - resilient development pathways» — the board meeting was almost anything but.
Although there are extreme limitations on what is known about potential tipping points the
new paradigm does provide an opportunity to reframe the
climate wars — clearly that nearly everyone has been dead wrong about the essential nature of Earth systems using simple causality rather then dynamical complexity.
«We believe that a
climate impact lens should be applied to all decisions regarding
new fossil fuel development, and urge that a «carbon - reducing clean energy» strategy, rather than an «all - of - the - above» strategy become the operative
paradigm for your administration's energy decisions,» the letter said.
He believes, and is disseminating on the right, a
new paradigm a) evidence on the risks of extreme
climate -LSB-...]
No, smart money is betting on the insurance industry's
new paradigm shift: For too long Big Oil and other
climate - science deniers have been shifting the burden of their short - term profit strategies to the public.
It's about shifting to a
new economic
paradigm, which boosts prosperity and human well - being, increases access to renewable energy, improves food security and air quality while also combatting
climate change.
Then the
new paradigm of spatio - temporal chaos provided an underlying mechanism for
climate shifts that was very different to the alternative story being told.
With abrupt
climate change — the new paradigm to replace AGW — the stage is set for radical change within as little as a decade possible at any time from natural causes — let alone with the interesting experiment of anthropogenic emissions in the mix (NAS Committee on Abrupt Climate Change 2002, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute Abrupt Climate Change Page, Royal Society
climate change — the
new paradigm to replace AGW — the stage is set for radical change within as little as a decade possible at any time from natural causes — let alone with the interesting experiment of anthropogenic emissions in the mix (NAS Committee on Abrupt
Climate Change 2002, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute Abrupt Climate Change Page, Royal Society
Climate Change 2002, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute Abrupt
Climate Change Page, Royal Society
Climate Change Page, Royal Society 2010).
The recognition of decadal
climate shifts are an example of better science — the
new paradigm of dynamical complexity in
climate.
Small changes push the system past a threshold at which stage a
new climate state emerges as tremendous energies cascade through powerful sub-systems — and this is indeed a quite widely accepted
climate science
paradigm.
Were we to build a
new climate - friendly, techno - economic
paradigm, we would recognize that energy systems are not fixed, but dynamic.
There is no doubt in my mind that a
new climate «
paradigm» will emerge to replace AGW (and CAGW), which will end up on the ash heap of history.
A
new science
paradigm is one that better explains data, in this case
climate data, than the old theory.
I don't know about a «
new religion» of
climate change, but there needs to be a «
new paradigm» getting away from energy budgets.
This is the
new paradigm advanced by the NAS but very little recognised by natural or
climate scientists.
The
paradigm shift was first applied to this
new idea of how
climate works by the NAS — «Abrupt
climate change: inevitable surprises».
Tom's challenge reminds me of Jennifer's comment about
new paradigms: We will not see reasonable stands on
climate issues gain the widest acceptance until there is a compelling and credible
new way to look at
climate.
In combination with
new approaches to grassroots advocacy and election campaigns, a complementary
paradigm for
climate advocacy is needed to shift our focus toward a broader portfolio of smaller scale policy actions and to the promotion of a more diverse array of technological options.
Dr. Norman J. Page Email:
[email protected] DOI: 10.1177 / 0958305X16686488 Energy & Environment 0 (0) 1 — 18 (C) The Author (s) 2017 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk / journalsPermissions.nav ABSTRACT This paper argues that the methods used by the establishment
climate science community are not fit for purpose and that a
new forecasting
paradigm should be adopted.
Foley is the latest voice to argue on behalf of a
new paradigm for
climate policy.
Beyond geoscientists, «this
new paradigm has not yet penetrated the impacts community,» that is, the economists and other specialists who tried to calculate the consequences of
climate change.
This
new paradigm of abrupt
climate change has been well established over the last decade by research of ocean, earth and atmosphere scientists at many institutions worldwide.
It is this inability of the current
paradigm to lead us to any deeper understanding of
climate that underlines the need for a
new paradigm.
The failure to understand the
new climate science
paradigm leads to a failure of policy.
Perhaps a
new paradigm of steady - state economics and integral human development, as opposed to just growth in consuming superfluous goods and services, would relax some of the pressures on
climate scientists to deliver solutions that are utterly outside the scope of
climate physics.
A
new paradigm for assesssing the role of agriculture in the
climate system and in
climate change.
«We need a
new paradigm for how to develop and apply
climate models to answer critical questions regarding the implications of our past and future energy choices for society and the environment,» says Bill Collins, ACME's Chief Scientist and head of the Earth Sciences Division's Climate Sciences Department at Berkel
climate models to answer critical questions regarding the implications of our past and future energy choices for society and the environment,» says Bill Collins, ACME's Chief Scientist and head of the Earth Sciences Division's
Climate Sciences Department at Berkel
Climate Sciences Department at Berkeley lab.
Like it or nor — understand it or not — this is the
new and powerful
climate paradigm.
Passed last March, Bill 102 notably amends Quebec's Watercourses Act and its environmental authorization scheme based on four risk - based categories of authorization and three important
new public
paradigms: social acceptability,
climate change and wetlands protection.