Not exact matches
♦ Eye
of the Tiber, Catholicism's answer to The Onion, has its own interpretation
of the Clintonista interest in «facilitating» the
development of Catholic
doctrine: «A
new series
of emails released yesterday by WikiLeaks connected to its dump
of John Podesta's server show that ancestors
of presidential nominee Hillary Clinton attempted to sabotage the Catholic Church by creating the Society
of Jesus hundreds
of years prior to her nomination.»
Perhaps showing how closely he follows the debates that have exploded over his various pronouncements, Francis devoted some time in his remarks to demonstrating that his
new position on the death penalty is part
of a «harmonious
development»
of doctrine.
I would suggest also that one way into such a
new doctrine of analogy is a
new understanding
of man or history as the image
of God, wherein historical
development and evolution could be seen as a reflection or embodiment
of the
development and evolution
of God.
As the «
new media»
of the printed book became common, the debates over the contents
of the canon subsided, and instead encouraged by its
new fixedness those over the exactness
of its inspiration (the
development of the
doctrines of infallibility, inerrancy, et al) began to spring up.
The word
doctrine is therefore being used in a way that is flexible enough to accommodate the variety
of biblical teaching on these and other subjects as well as the factor
of development in some themes as we move from the Old Testament into the
New Testament.
So the evolution
of the Church's understanding
of the gospel over the centuries is not a matter
of «paradigm shifts,» or ruptures, or radical breaks and
new beginnings; it's a question
of what theologians call the
development of doctrine.
The expressions and ideas In the Odes clearly show that they belong to a period prior to any systematic
development of Christian
doctrine and practice and they were the first attempt by a Christian community to express its
new found faith.
Can there not therefore be a genuinely fraternal place to discuss openness to the
development of doctrine (taking into account contributions
of modern sciences, philosophy and humanities) which is both faithful to the hierarchy
of dogmatic truths andsympathetic to
new methodology and content, without crossing over into an aggressively political or «conciliarist» view
of progress?
We need a
new and authentic
development of doctrine that will allow us to see the mysteries
of human sexuality and its sacred meanings more clearly so we can proclaim it to the world with greater clarity.
It is now just over 100 years since Blessed John Henry Newman's introduction to his
Development of Christian
Doctrine spoke
of «waking up with a
new world to conquer without the tools to do it».
Such was the beginning
of the Bible's conception
of the afterworld, and the
development of thought from this crude primitiveness
of Sheol to the
New Testament's
doctrine of eternal life constitutes one
of the most significant contributions
of the Scriptures to religious history.
In this explanation
of why he is not a Christian, Keith Parsons discusses the role that Christianity has played in perpetuating suffering throughout human history, the bizarre
doctrine of inflicting eternal punishment on persons for having the wrong beliefs, the composition, inconsistencies, and absurdities
of the
New Testament Gospels, William Lane Craig's flawed case for the resurrection
of Jesus, the role
of legendary
development and hallucinations in early Christianity, and C.S. Lewis» weak justifications for the Christian prohibition on premarital se - x.
We have noted before that Blessed John Henry Newman predicted that we in Britain would have «a
new world to conquer before we have weapons for the warfare» (Introduction to The
Development of Christian
Doctrine).
These could encompass the establishment
of real and constraining confidence - building measures, and the
development of defence
doctrines and military procurement policies that better reflect the cooperative security ideas inherent in what China referred to as its «
New Security Concept» first introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s (Gill, 2005).
The action effectively creates hundreds
of new pre-K seats with STEM curriculum, and it was critical to follow the proper procedures
of the public trust
doctrine in the interest
of protecting public parkland from unfettered
development.
With an ironic reference to conservative historical
doctrines Altintzoglou's current work employs the analytical and reflective inter-disciplinary methods
of Conceptual art in order to explore the ways by which
new technologies can affect the
development of art.
The suit also debuts a
new legal framework to fight climate change, one that portrays federal support for the
development and use
of fossil fuels as a violation
of the Fifth and Ninth Amendments, as well as the public trust
doctrine.
Age
of Greed: The Triumph
of Finance and the Decline
of America by Jeff Madrick Scarcity in Frontiers: How Economies Have Developed Through Natural Resource Exploitation by Edward Barbier Haiti After the Earthquake by Paul Farmer 1491:
New Revelations
of the Americas before Columbus by Charles Mann
Development as Freedom by Amartya Sen The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine by Michael Lewis The Shock
Doctrine: The Rise
of Disaster Capitalism by Naomi Klein Kicking Away the Ladder:
Development Strategy in Historical Perspective by Ha - Joon Chang
He added that the following values were all to be appreciated and brought into a pragmatic balance: that an efficient and cost - effective and relatively informal type
of alternative dispute resolution should not be stifled by the imposition
of legal
doctrine; that the opportunity for the
development of new ideas fitting to financial service industries operating in consumer markets should be appreciated for the benefits they could bring; that on the other hand transparency, consistency and accessibility as to the principles which informed the ombudsman's determinations remained virtues in the
new setting; and that publicity as to those principles and those determinations could assist in that regard.
In particular, Eli Lilly claimed that the
development of the «promise
doctrine» in Canadian patent law led to the invalidation
of patents protecting its drugs atomoxetine (Strattera ®) and olanzapine (Zyprexa ®) by Canadian courts, and that this
doctrine was radically
new, arbitrary, and discriminatory against pharmaceutical companies.