Sentences with phrase «new distinctions in»

Sometimes, the only thing you need to further your career is to generate new distinctions in certain areas.

We also recommend that staff reading and discussion be guided by an essential question: What are the new distinctions in these Standards and what do they mean for our practice?

Not exact matches

It seems like a minute distinction but it's part of New Belgium's larger culture of involving all its members in the decision making process.

This distinction comes with a real perk: the candidates hired or promoted through the process are eligible to attend a two - day client forum in 2018, attended by 55 corporate in - house legal honchos there to network, mentor and perhaps offer lucrative new business.

In July, the Department of Labor issued guidelines to clarify the distinction between employee and freelancer for the purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act — and the new interpretations are not favorable to the new - economy model.

As Harvard Law professor Jack Goldsmith pointed out in an essay earlier this year on the Lawfare site, it is extremely difficult — and perhaps even impossible — to draw a meaningful distinction between what the New York Times does and what WikiLeaks does.

Yes, another one; but the distinction here lies in the quality of the writers — Vanity Fair contributor McLean co-authored the classic Enron book The Smartest Guys in the Room, while Nocera is a columnist for The New York Times and a staff writer for the paper's magazine — and in the frame they choose for their history.

In the run up to the Iowa caucus, Ted Cruz recognized the importance of U.S. regional differences and tried to use those distinctions to his advantage by accusing Donald Trump of exhibiting «New York values.»

Best cryptocurrency to invest in 2018 for removing more distinction in trade or investment many new cryptocurrency.

Mr. Li holds a Master of Science in Mathematics in Finance from the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences at New York University and an Honors BSc in Applied Mathematics with high distinction from the University of Toronto.

It is worth noting that Judge Miner's inability to parse that distinction was not shared by the New York State Task Force on Life and the Law, a twenty - four member commission appointed by Governor Cuomo in 1985 to advise on questions of biomedical ethics.

The real distinction of spirit and matter could be seen, in the synthesis he proposed, in a remarkable and new way through the «Law of Control and Direction» which had been originally shown to his mother.

At this point those accustomed to Bultmann's earlier distinction of Jesus from Paul in terms of law and gospel,» and his subsequent classification of Jesus within Judaism2 as only a presupposition of New Testament theology, would expect him simply to repeat that position.

Furthermore, many of the discussions in which philosophy plays the primary role consist in developing distinctions or new concepts that make possible the intelligent affirmation of doctrines that are believed strictly on the grounds of revelation.

In fact, Powell suggests, most contemporary thinkers have dethroned Luther's distinction between the Deus absconditus and the Deus revelatus (God hidden and revealed) by stressing how God's redemptive acts in history reveal nothing new about God's intra-divine life, but act to confirm what is eternally truIn fact, Powell suggests, most contemporary thinkers have dethroned Luther's distinction between the Deus absconditus and the Deus revelatus (God hidden and revealed) by stressing how God's redemptive acts in history reveal nothing new about God's intra-divine life, but act to confirm what is eternally truin history reveal nothing new about God's intra-divine life, but act to confirm what is eternally true.

It will be seen that the new doctrine requires careful and somewhat elaborate distinctions, and yet, if some of its supporters are right, the doctrine is nothing at all but the analysis of the simple idea that God is «the perfectly loving individual,» in all respects possessed of the properties which this idea requires, even if non-perfection in some respects be among the requirements.

Indeed, in no particular is the distinction between the Testaments much more marked than in the slight stress on faith in the Old and the centrality of it in the New.

It seems to me that in the New Testament, Paul is especially adamant on the point (in I Corinthians 10 - 11, for example), that Christianity is no place for the flaunting of privilege or distinction (whether class or ethnic or whatever), and I think that is exactly what happens anytime you have a church were some members are cool and know it (and flaunt it), while others are not so much.

The way of distinction, therefore, puts a positive valuation on the time - space continuum and, though it sees divine redemption as the remaking of history into something new, it can not conceive of divine - human interaction in other than historical terms which preserve the qualitative difference between God and man.

History is moving toward the ultimate dissolution of the distinction between God and man and a merging of the two in the new godmanhood of the eschatological age.

«21 Applying this distinction to God we can see that the primary meaning of an «act of God» would refer to «the act whereby, in each new present, he constitutes himself as God.

My Lutheran friends were interested in what for them was a new distinction.

In his book Man as Male and Female (Eerdmans, 1975), Jewett argues for an egalitarian male / female relationship by calling for distinctions (within the New Testament materials themselves) between Paul the former rabbi and Paul the apostle, or between Paul's perception of the truth and his implementation of it in the first centurIn his book Man as Male and Female (Eerdmans, 1975), Jewett argues for an egalitarian male / female relationship by calling for distinctions (within the New Testament materials themselves) between Paul the former rabbi and Paul the apostle, or between Paul's perception of the truth and his implementation of it in the first centurin the first century.

1 The distinction between essential and conditional features derives from a discussion by Paul Weiss in Nature and Man (New York: Henry Holt & Co., 1948), pp. 39ff.

The traditional reply to this has been to make a distinction between the visible Church (the Church as a social institution) and the invisible Church (the community of those who have been restored to new life by faith in Jesus as Christ, whether they belong to the visible institution or not).

(I take my distinction of signals and symbols from Susanne Langer, Philosophy in a New Key, third edition [Harvard University Press, 1957], especially Chapter III.

I have benefited from other efforts to classify civil religions, especially John A. Coleman, «Civil Religion,» Sociological Analysis, 31 (Summer1970), pp. 67 - 77, and Martin E. Marty, «Two Kinds of Two Kinds of Civil Religion,» in R. E. Richey and D. G. Jones, eds., American Civil Religion (New York: Harper & Row, 1974), although some of their distinctions are not incorporated in my typology.

In the light of this, the «cleansed» temple becomes itself a symbol of the new order, in which there is no distinction of Jew and Gentile, but a united people of God offers him a pure worship «in spirit and in truth» (as John puts it elsewhereIn the light of this, the «cleansed» temple becomes itself a symbol of the new order, in which there is no distinction of Jew and Gentile, but a united people of God offers him a pure worship «in spirit and in truth» (as John puts it elsewherein which there is no distinction of Jew and Gentile, but a united people of God offers him a pure worship «in spirit and in truth» (as John puts it elsewherein spirit and in truth» (as John puts it elsewherein truth» (as John puts it elsewhere).

So you would make a distinction between Christianity, Christians, and the Church looking to Christ as founder (which would seem to be consistent with what I propose) but then in terms of «a new movement» would in agreement with Bernardo that Paul is the founder of the church (or «new movement») whithout which Christianity would not exist.

But there is widespread agreement among New Testament scholars that in the apostolic period there was no such clear distinction between the risen Christ and the Holy Spirit.

In most New Thought denominations a distinction is made between the historical person, Jesus of Nazareth, and the Christ consciousness he is believed to embody.

In this book he is able at length to elaborate on the key distinction between evolution and ideology which he drew to the world's attention in his now - famous article in the New York Times in July 200In this book he is able at length to elaborate on the key distinction between evolution and ideology which he drew to the world's attention in his now - famous article in the New York Times in July 200in his now - famous article in the New York Times in July 200in the New York Times in July 200in July 2005.

I suggest that a reading of scripture gives us the clues, that John was in fact the last Levitical priest whose task was to inaugurate the» handing over» of the priesthood to the new High Priest, in the new order of Melchizedek (as the writer of the Letter to Hebrews explains it) So Jesus came to John the Levite, John gave Jesus the ritual bath of the High Priest, then Jesus emerged from the bath not to be anointed with oil as the old Levites, but to be anointed with the Holy Spirit and then Jesus» distinction was announced to the people by the voice of God Himself.

This general view finds its fullest and clearest New Testament expression in the Fourth Gospel, was elaborated in the great creedal discussions of several centuries later, and was finally and definitively formulated by the Council of Chalcedon in 451: «One and the same Christ, Son, Lord, only begotten, acknowledged in two natures, without confusion, without change, without division, without separation; the distinction of the natures being by no means taken away because of the union, but rather the property of each nature being preserved and concurring in one person.

In the New Time there is no longer any distinction between those things that we classified on other levels as physical or moral, natural or artificial, organic or collective, biological or juridical.

In sum, in the argument that a PVS patient ought to be sustained as long as possible I see the unhappy fruits of the three technological seductions I described above: death by «starvation» has now become our fault, not nature's, if we omit treatment; the distinction between omission and commission is erased in the insistence that the stopping of artificial feeding is the same as killing the patient and, as too often happens, a new technology gets legitimated and routinized by an invocation of the sanctity of lifIn sum, in the argument that a PVS patient ought to be sustained as long as possible I see the unhappy fruits of the three technological seductions I described above: death by «starvation» has now become our fault, not nature's, if we omit treatment; the distinction between omission and commission is erased in the insistence that the stopping of artificial feeding is the same as killing the patient and, as too often happens, a new technology gets legitimated and routinized by an invocation of the sanctity of lifin the argument that a PVS patient ought to be sustained as long as possible I see the unhappy fruits of the three technological seductions I described above: death by «starvation» has now become our fault, not nature's, if we omit treatment; the distinction between omission and commission is erased in the insistence that the stopping of artificial feeding is the same as killing the patient and, as too often happens, a new technology gets legitimated and routinized by an invocation of the sanctity of lifin the insistence that the stopping of artificial feeding is the same as killing the patient and, as too often happens, a new technology gets legitimated and routinized by an invocation of the sanctity of life.

In the aftermath of the United States military response to the car - bombing of American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania last August, New York's John Cardinal O'Connor drew a distinction between ad hoc, after - the - fact moral judgments about such particular responses to terrorism and a..In the aftermath of the United States military response to the car - bombing of American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania last August, New York's John Cardinal O'Connor drew a distinction between ad hoc, after - the - fact moral judgments about such particular responses to terrorism and a..in Kenya and Tanzania last August, New York's John Cardinal O'Connor drew a distinction between ad hoc, after - the - fact moral judgments about such particular responses to terrorism and a....

However, if this is to be more than a mere switch in poles, then both spirit and flesh must pass into one another and become some third thing (a synthesis or coincidence of the two that is a new identity rather than a tensive relation of the two in union and distinction, since Altizer appears to reject the latter idea of coincidence).

I think you've made an important distinction about reading the Old Testament not only in light of the New Testament, but in light of Jesus and what his life and sacrifice tell us about the character of God.

This primary empirical consideration, which affirms the importance of the mind - body distinction, is strongly contested, says Searle, by «the professionals in philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence, neurobiology, and cognitive science» («Consciousness and the Philosophers,» The New York Review of Books [March 6,1997], 43 - 50).

Other indications of evolution are too numerous to actually list in full, but a few might be the clear genetic distinction between Neanderthals and modern man; the overlapping features of hominid and pre-hominid fossil forms; the progressive order of the fossil record (that is, first fish, then amphibians, then reptiles, then mammals, then birds; contradicting the Genesis order and all flood models); the phylogenetic relationships between extant and extinct species (including distributions of parasitic genetic elements like Endogenous Retroviruses); the real time observations of speciation in the lab and in the wild; the real time observations of novel functionality in the lab and wild (both genetic, Lenski's E. coli, and organsimal, the Pod Mrcaru lizards); the observation of convergent evolution defeating arguments of common component creationism (new world v. old world vultures for instance); and... well... I guess you get the picture.

If it is true that religion is becoming more highly differentiated, then it may be especially important to develop greater effectiveness in dealing with new distinctions, with new understandings of symbolism, and with new kinds of religious organizations.

Propelling the term «human shield» to new depths of misuse and immorality, Abunimah in one fell swoop undoes the Geneva Convention, and ends all distinction between combatants and civilians.

There is only interpretation; and the politics of interpretation, the only kind of politics available in bad postmodernity, are the politics of destroying liberalism's venerable public / private distinction in favor of a new one between official and unofficial interpretations.

In time the laity may not care to observe the distinction between the new Christ - bearers and ordained priests, despite the Vatican's «infallible» teaching that the former are forever excluded from the ranks of the latter.

In the new phase, the distinction between Arab and provincial fades away, and provinces and regions regain their individuality and autonomy within the consciously recognized Islamic unity.

There are many distinctions noted between the various Sufi orders — as to whether they observed seemliness or extravagance in their exercises, whether they were urban or rural, whether they tried to propagate the faith among non-Muslims or wandered about with no particular mission, whether they set up new dynasties dedicated to holy war or the extirpation of heresy, and the like.

Thus, by abandoning the man - woman distinction in favor of the heterosexual - homosexual distinction, homosexual activists demand not parenthood (paternity or maternity), but the right to some new abstract parental status that reduces the role of the «parent» to the exercise of certain functions such as education.

All this may be in accordance with the «new hermeneutic», but it is a clear abandoning of hard - won distinctions and of the gains from hard - fought battles.

Occurring as it does in the context of a review of one of the most spectacularly successful empirical historical investigations in the whole field of life of Christ research, it is clear evidence of a tendency of the «new hermeneutic» to blur the distinction between statements possible on the basis of academic historical research and statements possible only on the basis of faith.