Sentences with phrase «new editors often»

I work with a lot of publishers, and new editors often check my website.

Not exact matches

Talented writers are often promoted to editors without consideration for their skills» suitability to the new role.

Though they could not support the expansionistic goals of many of the Allies, the editors often emphasized that war brought great changes in the world, many of which opened new doors of opportunity for the expansion of Christianity.

Dicker, the veteran state editor for the New York Post, has been a consistent booster of Cuomo and serves as a useful clearing house for Cuomo's proposals, personnel decisions and political threats, which often appear first in Dicker's column as lightly attributed offerings of sources close to the governor.

Editors have a database of reviewers their journals have built up over the years, but they often look for new, reliable reviewers.

But Marcia Angell, a senior lecturer in social medicine at Harvard Medical School and the former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine, says companies often structure research in a manner that is most likely to yield favorable conclusions — by comparing a medication against a placebo, for instance, instead of comparing it with its most effective competitors.

From its examination of a publication that seeks to deliver relevant and hard - hitting news in the face of sensationalistic competitors to its knowing aside of how honest editors are often at odds with salesmen worried about losing advertising clients due to unfavorable coverage, the picture benefits from the experiences of writer - director Richard Brooks, who had been a New York reporter before becoming a successful filmmaker (he won an Oscar for adapting Elmer Gantry and was also behind the excellent screen versions of In Cold Blood and Cat on a Hot Tin Roof).

When Roger Straus or Lucy Morello brought a new author to Frankfurt, they all jumped, as they did for Rob Routman, the head - turning editor in chief of Owl House — sometimes, it was rumored, without reading all that much (or, let's be honest, any) of the manuscript — because often, or often enough anyway, the books «worked,» i.e., sold copies back home.

But rather than segregating self published books, what I would rather see is an education of the public to differentiate between the terms vanity publishing (which I think most folks agree is generally bad and awful and will never lose its stigma), self - publishing (which often connotes work that has not been properly vetted by people who know how to judge a good product) and indie publishing, which is a term that those of us who use it are hoping will come to mean quality — work that has been vetted by independent editors and formatted by people who give a damn about putting out a professional product that rivals anything put out by New York.

Often the speakers are editors of small houses (and agents looking for new stuff) who will listen to your pitch and ask you to submit.

Alas, so few editors at English - language publishers can speak another language, and they rely either on external readers (often newer translators) or, most commonly, on a pitch, which includes a synopsis, sample chapters in translation, and any other selling points (awards, sales history, institutional supports for the translation and / or printing costs, etc.) that can help convince them.

Editors and publishers will often contact bloggers whose posts represent new ideas and fresh approaches.

I hope you'll explain what developmental editors do, as well — how they often start with an author before a word is written, how they support, challenge, and sometimes suggest characters, stories ideas, structure; and how they also line - edit and even suggest new language for character development, dialogue, and other aspects of the literary style.

New authors often wonder why they can't skip paying for a professional editor and crowdsource their editing instead among volunteer readers.

As a developmental editor, I often work with authors to reconstruct, revise, and create completely new openings.

Editor's note: For our readers less familiar with the inner workings of Cat Town, the new adoption center space, often called «the studios,» was formerly known as Cat Zone 2.

Omar Kholeif is a tireless curator, writer and editor, whose work on modern and contemporary art has often focused on the impact of technology and new media.

Often known as a «neo-Pop» painter, the artist has been a key figure of the New York art scene for decades as editor - in - chief of Artnet magazine, alongside being subject to exhibitions at several New York galleries.

Now I don't know how often a paper would be published without the awareness of an editor - in - chief, particularly in a relatively new and not terribly well - established journal, but I suppose it is possible.

The WordPress editor is very user - friendly and we can often teach people to make new pages, stylize text and add images in about a half an hour.

For the most part, these new editions are unnecessary and unjustified, lightly sprinkled with gratuitous and often ill - considered changes that fail to advance citation practice, confuse and sow uncertainty and even disagreement among even seasoned legal writers, editors and instructors, and generally make citation practice even less uniform and uniformity more difficult to realize.