Sentences with phrase «new evil are»

Which new evil are we to fight this time?

Therefore much new evils are to be found among tribal peoples which were not there in the traditional society - evils created by lawless individualism, irresponsible exercise of power and money.

The Shadow is rising and a new evil is spreading its nefarious wings.

Not exact matches

I am one of those who think like Nobel, that humanity will draw more good than evil from new discoveries.

It was the new Evil Empire versus the new Kings of Moneyball.

Now that Dr. Evil is out of the White House, he said he'll be promoting a new book: «Fire and Fury and Also Evil and More Fire and Also Magma Too» — a spoof on the book «Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House» by Michael Wolff.

In doing so, Hitchens summed up the mantras of the new atheism: that «faith is a fairy tale», that it is possible to be «good without God» and that religion is not just false, but evil.

And... evil people still live here, they just aren't allowed into the New Jerusalem.

«Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached».

It is a new heaven and earth in the absence of evil.

Put a burden on their backs they could not carry, then beat them when they fell under the load Read your history, Gilbert... the church has historically justified all manner of evil against the Jews because of their «failure» to accept this new version of G - d's «mercy», which requires them to believe that G - d wasn't serious when he told them their covenant was «for ALL generations».

However, the new theology is both explicable and testable in the ontological sense, that God is not responsible for the origin of evil and temptation.

Their father warned them about the Nazi evil at the very beginning of the new regime, and at their trial their father bravely cried out, «There is a higher court before which we all must stand!»

New drink called the bio laden 2 shots and a splash of water obl last words pizzas here * anyone who thinks he is something other than a evil killer your right he is whale poo.may his 72 virgins have the clap or be lesbians

The new testament acknowledges that there are evil governments who should be feared, but there is no promotion for revenge, war, or punishment.

Pope Benedict got one thing right, when quoting a Byzantine emperor who said: «Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.»

The most recent attack on on Arendt, linking her directly not only to a romantic but an ideological affiliation with Martin Heidegger and Nazism is contained in Ron Rosenbaum, «The Evil of Banality: Troubling New Revelations about Arendt and Heidegger.»

Just a year and a half after Benedict became pope, he infuriated many Muslims by quoting a medieval Byzantine emperor who said: «Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.»

The great evil is that once a contestant answers yes (or once the answer is shown by the polygraph to be yes), then the secret is set loose, and what was simply a powerless, hidden thought takes on a new reality.

Georgetown Law Professor Michael Seidman says in the New York Times that we should conclude, «the American system of government is broken» not because of political divisions, but because of the Constitution «with all its archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions.»

In this new situation they are asked much more; they are asked to believe that their country has been evil.

The powers arrayed against God were able to get the pinnacle of God's new creation to betray God and fight for them in their evil cause.

A doctrine challenged by science can be abandoned; a commandment that clashes with modern attitudes ignored; the problem of evil washed away in a New Age bath.»

The New Testament is ubiquitously clear: don't retaliate with evil for evil; do good to those who hate you; embrace your enemy with a cross-shaped, unyielding divine love.

Love of this kind is, quite literally, «beyond good and evil,» and that is why the new morality has become such a powerful justification for adultery.

13:33), it is used here and elsewhere in the New Testament to mean something evil.

I know my theory about evil and the violence of God is new to most, but it is not new to me.

The war between right and wrong, good and evil, the old self and new self in Christ rages on, and so to look for instructions and fulfillment on how to live better lives is like looking to a country in the midst of civil war for instructions on how to set up a functioning government.

«New natural law» is an oxymoron if natural law is by definition immutable, and invoking it to impute intrinsic evil to capital punishment paves the way — logically, if unintentionally — to undermining doctrine against contraception, abortion, and sexual inversion.

But this evil is not the expression of the new testament.

He took Christian unity to a new level of seriousness and was well - regarded - even loved - by men and women from Christian communities which had long regarded the Pope as an evil figure.

Does it rest on a universe devoid of good and evil (as Richard Dawkins has bluntly stated) or can it be used to provide a new foundation for natural law reasoning (as Larry Arnhart contends)?

W. E. Vine, in his Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words, says that the word «destruction» is used «metaphorically of men persistent in evil (Rom 9:22), where «fitted» is in the middle voice, indicating that the vessels of wrath fitted themselves for destruction» (Vine's Expository Dictionary, 2:165)

We observe that evil has no boundaries — the very existence of torture, and the fact that human rights organisations believe that over 80 % of the world's governments practice some form of it, shows that humans are not just content to be a little bit evil, but are most willing to be CREATIVELY evil, concocting new ways to inflict pain and suffering onto others.

Orthodox Christianity would seem to Davies ample enough to support this new life, but, whether through understandable caution or unthinking fear, it has always been indisposed to accept any notion of fullness that asks us not to cut off or pluck out what we identify as evil, but rather to know it wholly — as part of life, as part of holiness, as part even of God.

He said that baptism means «that our sinful self, with all its evil deeds and desires, should be drowned through daily repentance, and that day after day a new self should arise to live with God in righteousness and purity forever» (The Small Catechism).

'» (90) The prevailing attitude, he shows, is heavily influenced by the Platonic concept of an evil material world and a perfect immaterial soul, as well as a misunderstanding of Scripture in which heaven, (as a kind of final resting place for the soul), is emphasized over the clear biblical picture of a new heaven and new earth for which believers will be physically resurrected.

Although both Old and New Testaments encourage us to hate what is evil, nowhere in the Bible to my knowledge are we explicitly commanded to direct our hate towards individuals.

«Abhor what is evil,» is a New Testament commandment that too often is ignored and disobeyed (Romans 12:9).

Gustav Aulen's contention, for example, that the New Testament teaching on Christ's death is teaching simply about his conquest of the devil — the «classic motif» falls into this category as does Karl Barth's understanding of evil conveyed in his term das Nichtige or Karl Rahner's «supernatural existential.»

This was followed by five subsequent phases of development in a regular pattern of succession: (1) the organization of home and foreign mission societies to channel new leadership into church planting or into the field; (2) the production and distribution of Christian literature; (3) the renewal and extension of Christian educational institutions; (4) attempts at «the reformation of manners» — i.e., the reassertion of Christian moral standards in a decadent society; and (5) the great humanitarian crusades against social evils like slavery, war and intemperance.

My contention is that this places Ivan's sensibility much nearer to the authentic vision of the New Testament than are many of the more pious and conventional forms of Christian conviction today The gospel of the ancient church was always one of rebellion against those principalities and powers — death chief among them — that enslave and torment creation; nowhere does the New Testament rationalize evil or accord it necessity or treat it as part of the necessary fabric of God's world.

The new man is a Christian born again -LCB- indwelt by the Holy Spirit (after believing in Christ as his savior) and should be walking in / after the Spirit -RCB-; that is, the new man has a good nature, evil / sin nature and the indwelling Holy Spirit and should be willingly walking in / after the Spirit (Eph.

Something has changed so that our new beings are not drawn away from God and towards that former knowledge of good and evil.

Moreover, there are no museums testifying to the evils of communism, no memorials to communism's victims, and no Gulag camps maintained as reminders to new generations of the crimes committed by Communist regimes.

New motives must be instilled; new outlooks engendered; not a few evil elements in personal, social, economic, and political structures must be challenged and changNew motives must be instilled; new outlooks engendered; not a few evil elements in personal, social, economic, and political structures must be challenged and changnew outlooks engendered; not a few evil elements in personal, social, economic, and political structures must be challenged and changed.

Missionaries» new religious devices, Bible, baptism etc., were perceived by some of the Malayarayans as powerful guarantee against evil spirits.

A Nair reported to the missionaries that after the arrival of Christianity among the Pulayas the «evil spirits were obliged to run away from the places» and there was «scarcely any instance of demonical possession» among them.49 Some of the priests of the Pulayas who converted to Christianity demolished the images of their deities in the presence of the missionaries, thereby suggesting belief in the power of the new God which they had found in Christianity.

«YAHWEH the Mighty One of peace,» this is a key to the New Covenant; what you can not do YAHWEH will work in you, «Set you Apart from evil completely, «this you can ask for and expect», and your entire spirit, inner being and body be kept blameless in the presence of our Master YAHSHUA the MESSIYAH.»

NO this is not the teachings of God the Almighty of the Old and New Testament this is evil and perverted and all Christians must take notice and action to keep their children safe from being converted to this false religion that is nothing more then a totalitarian system of government.