Sentences with phrase «new global consensus»

-LSB-...] Twenty years have passed since the fall of the Berlin wall, when the UN undertook to build a «new global consensus» on the norms, values and priorities of international cooperation for the post-Cold War era and the 21st century.

Not exact matches

As the year progressed, the consensus abandoned talk of «secular stagnation» for a new catchphrase: «global synchronous growth.»

In a new report, «Beyond Secular Stagnation,» Morgan Stanley's Global Investment Committee deconstructs the consensus view by examining some of the most frequently - cited drivers of secular stagnation.

1) Copenhagen demonstrated that global governance has overreached itself; 2) The crisis provokes a shift away from idealistic globalism, back to pragmatic concerns; 3) «Global consensus» established by «experts» is not and has never been genuine; 4) The institutions of global governance prove unable to resolve their identity crisis and to reform themselves; they are fragmented; 5) Global governance pays the bill for not taking into account non-western cultures and civilisations; 6) Displaying an incapacity to provide real leadership, produce a vision for the world, new ideas / ideologies, global governance opts for a survival appglobal governance has overreached itself; 2) The crisis provokes a shift away from idealistic globalism, back to pragmatic concerns; 3) «Global consensus» established by «experts» is not and has never been genuine; 4) The institutions of global governance prove unable to resolve their identity crisis and to reform themselves; they are fragmented; 5) Global governance pays the bill for not taking into account non-western cultures and civilisations; 6) Displaying an incapacity to provide real leadership, produce a vision for the world, new ideas / ideologies, global governance opts for a survival appGlobal consensus» established by «experts» is not and has never been genuine; 4) The institutions of global governance prove unable to resolve their identity crisis and to reform themselves; they are fragmented; 5) Global governance pays the bill for not taking into account non-western cultures and civilisations; 6) Displaying an incapacity to provide real leadership, produce a vision for the world, new ideas / ideologies, global governance opts for a survival appglobal governance prove unable to resolve their identity crisis and to reform themselves; they are fragmented; 5) Global governance pays the bill for not taking into account non-western cultures and civilisations; 6) Displaying an incapacity to provide real leadership, produce a vision for the world, new ideas / ideologies, global governance opts for a survival appGlobal governance pays the bill for not taking into account non-western cultures and civilisations; 6) Displaying an incapacity to provide real leadership, produce a vision for the world, new ideas / ideologies, global governance opts for a survival appglobal governance opts for a survival approach.

-LSB-...] Global governance can be «described» as the new global political regime which informally came about in the course of the post-Cold War conference process of the United Nations (1990 - 96), when a new «global consensus» was built, not primarily by governments themselves but through a historical and strategic partnership between the UN and so - called «non-state actors», mainly powerful western - basedGlobal governance can be «described» as the new global political regime which informally came about in the course of the post-Cold War conference process of the United Nations (1990 - 96), when a new «global consensus» was built, not primarily by governments themselves but through a historical and strategic partnership between the UN and so - called «non-state actors», mainly powerful western - basedglobal political regime which informally came about in the course of the post-Cold War conference process of the United Nations (1990 - 96), when a new «global consensus» was built, not primarily by governments themselves but through a historical and strategic partnership between the UN and so - called «non-state actors», mainly powerful western - basedglobal consensus» was built, not primarily by governments themselves but through a historical and strategic partnership between the UN and so - called «non-state actors», mainly powerful western - based NGOs.

«Now the consensus that underpinned this system is breaking apart and there is a new trajectory towards accepting global policy pluralism.»

With a growing consensus in the global health community that Hepatitis C (HCV) could be eliminated, a new report from the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown University highlights a key missing element needed to achieving complete eliminationâ $ «adequate surveillance and monitoringâ $ «and explains how modest investments would improve lives and save global health community that Hepatitis C (HCV) could be eliminated, a new report from the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown University highlights a key missing element needed to achieving complete eliminationâ $ «adequate surveillance and monitoringâ $ «and explains how modest investments would improve lives and save Global Health Law at Georgetown University highlights a key missing element needed to achieving complete eliminationâ $ «adequate surveillance and monitoringâ $ «and explains how modest investments would improve lives and save money.

As current trends in contemporary society demand new educational responses, and traditional systems of learning are substantially challenged and reshaped, consensus is building around the importance of developing learners well prepared to meet the demands that current and future global trends make on individuals and societies, particularly in the area of civic and social participation, and ethical behavior in a world increasingly marked by difference.

In # 78 Chris wrote:... «But with every year that the global temperature fails to break new ground (say +0.50 on the Hadley measure) the more receptive I will be to arguments for lower - than - consensus climate sensitivities».

One of the newest elements is the relatively quick emergence of global scientific consensus — what does that mean?

With an impending population of nine billion and a growing consensus that climate change posses significant dangers, Andrew Revkin has tackled the question of global sustainability with his New York Times blog Dot Earth.

The consensus of the two conferences of environmental lawyers is that the environmental problems of irreversible global change have become grave and require new legal principles and practices.

One might first note, as The New American has reported before, that «consensus» itself is often manipulated, a good example being the debunked claim that «97 percent of scientists affirm anthropogenic global warming.»

After years of imposed «scientific consensus» on global warming, a number of skeptical climate scientists are hopeful that their views may finally get a hearing under the new administration.

While the guests varied on the feasibility of global governance of long - term deployment, there was a consensus that new governance structures are needed to manage research and to continue to debate questions of ethics, political consequences, and material risk.

First of all, we all owe Joe Romm thanks for being quick to draw up the natural extension to the Marcott et al. graph showing the consensus picture of the near future global temperature in the light of this new result:

23 Sept: Live Science: Becky Oskin: Climate Scientists: IPCC Report Must Communicate Consensus Climate experts also told LiveScience they would like to see the new report stress the scientific consensus on climate change, and emphasize the link between human activities and global warming.

A major peer - reviewed paper by four senior researchers has exposed grave errors in an earlier paper in a new and unknown journal that had claimed a 97.1 % scientific consensus that Man had caused at least half the 0.7 Cº global warming since 1950.

What comes after the New York City march in pulling together a global grass roots policy consensus?

Thursday, April 14, 2016, 5:30 PM - Greenland's earliest recorded melt shocked scientists this week, while at the same time, a new report ultimately confirms the 97 per cent consensus that human activity is responsible for recent changes in our climate due to global warming.

The new work goes well beyond an increasingly dated consensus finding of the international scientific community on sea level, which stated that it could increase by nearly 1 meter by the year 2100, under a worst - case scenario version of global warming.

Earlier this month, a New York Times article by Andy Revkin voiced concern over a gap between «the consensus» of climate scientists and public acceptance of the theory of human - caused global warming.

The current consensus ie that GH gases are responsible for most of the current global warming and will be responsible fore even more warming in the future, can only be replaced by a new one if a coherent case, rather than a whole collection of mutually incompatible objections, is made.

The thrust of Mankiw's op - ed, One Answer to Global Warming: A New Tax, is that there is a «broad consensus» among «policy wonks» that «if we want to reduce global emissions of carbon, we need a global carboGlobal Warming: A New Tax, is that there is a «broad consensus» among «policy wonks» that «if we want to reduce global emissions of carbon, we need a global carboglobal emissions of carbon, we need a global carboglobal carbon tax.

«Fewer Republicans say they believe that there is a scientific consensus on climate change or that the effects of global warming have already begun, according to a new Gallup poll, which showed a widening partisan gap near record levels.»

The New American has published many stories over the years debunking the claim that there is a «consensus of science» on man - made global warming, particularly exposing the flawed and fraudulent studies by Naomi Oreskes and John Cook that have been cited innumerable times to manufacture the «97 percent of scientists agree» myth.

The declaration calls on the United Nations to discontinue work on a new treaty until a genuine «scientific consensus is reached on the phenomenon of so - called global warming,» including both its natural and human causes.

Associated Press covers «Climate Hustle» DC Premiere with Palin: «Seeks to debunk what it calls myths & hype about human - caused global warming» — AP reports on Climate Hustle: «New documentary seeks to debunk what it calls myths and hype about human - caused global warming» — Film exposes «what it calls myths and hype about human - caused global warming» — «Questions whether there is a genuine scientific consensus about global warming»

and one more confirming the data Paul points out above: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2093264/Forget-global-warming–Cycle-25-need-worry-NASA-scientists-right-Thames-freezing-again.html... The supposed «consensus» on man - made global warming is facing an inconvenient challenge after the release of new temperature data showing the planet has not warmed for the past 15 years...

There's of course all the new solar physics models that have been released in the past few years which indicates the sun, not CO2, is the primary climate factor, and they are predicting global cooling as well (and having a difficult time getting published and taken seriously by the «consensus» holders):

In 1974 when the Club of Rome formulated it, the consensus was that global cooling (due to dust and pollution from natural volcanic eruptions and from industry) was screening out sunlight, and we were in for runaway glaciation and a new ice age.

These countries risk becoming increasingly sidelined, as the global community works to forge consensus on a new logic under the ADP.

Climate Change Reconsidered proves there is no «consensus» on dangerous manmade global warming — and raises the debate to a new level.

(12/05/2011) A new methodology to tease out how much current climate change is linked to human activities has added to the consensus that behind global warming is us.

The new target: Naomi Oreskes who last week found her research used as a foil by some lawmakers in the U.S. House of Representatives to try and discredit the widely - accepted and growing view that there is a broad scientific consensus on the evidence of human - caused global warming caused by rising carbon dioxide emissions.

A new opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal attacks the 97 % scientific consensus on man - made global warming while completely missing the point on what scientists are actually saying about climate change.

Although Dyson has been railing against the AGW consensus since at least 2005, his first prominent exposure in the mainstream press came in a fawning 2008 New York Review of Books piece on William Nordhaus's A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies.

A new survey conducted by a team of volunteers at Skeptical Science has definitively confirmed the scientific consensus in climate science literature - 97 percent of peer - reviewed papers agree that global warming is happening and human activities are responsible.

(05/27/2013) A new consensus statement by 520 scientists from around the world warns that global environmental harm is putting at risk the happiness and well - being of this and future generations.

Is there a new scientific consensus forming around global cooling?

97 % consensus on human - caused global warming has been disproven Cooks» 97 % consensus» disproven by a new peer reviewed paper showing major math errors (Anthony Watts)

The ad, which ran on the New York Times op - ed page, suggested that scientists were debating the cause of global warming, even though there was a clear scientific consensus by that time that humans were responsible.

To the consternation of alarmists, New York Times op ed writer Bret Stephens openly questioned the «consensus» that has demanded uniform acceptance without question of the global warming / climate change orthodoxy.

A new survey of over 12,000 peer - reviewed climate science papers by our citizen science team at Skeptical Science has found a 97 % consensus among papers taking a position on the cause of global warming in the peer - reviewed literature that humans are responsible.

ANNOUNCER: As the 2008 presidential campaign begins, a new bipartisan consensus has emerged on global warming.

There were plenty of food companies eager to support the fat - is - bad consensus and profit by selling new low - fat products, just as there are companies — whole industries, in fact — eagerly promoting research and policies that jibe with the prevailing view on the dangers of global warming.

Unfortunately for the consensus alarmism, this new study indicates Antarctica's canary in the global warming fearmongering - fable has actually been cooling over the last 20 years, not warming (see chart).

A new survey of over 12,000 peer - reviewed climate science papers by our citizen science team at Skeptical Science has found a 97 % consensus in the peer - reviewed literature that humans are causing global warming.

«A new survey of over 12,000 peer - reviewed climate science papers [between the years1991 and 2011] by our citizen science team» has found a 97 % consensus among papers taking a position on the cause of global warming in the peer - reviewed literature that humans are responsible.»

Note: this post is the new rebuttal to the myth 97 % consensus on human - caused global warming has been disproven