Thus it is clear that Jesus in this connection too does not preach
a new idea of God — as if God had hitherto been represented as too arbitrary and hard, vindictive and angry, and was rather to be thought of as benevolent and gracious.
It may be impossible to demonstrate that Christianity contains
a new idea of God — every element in the formal Christian conception can be found, at least implicitly, in the Old Testament — but even an «objective» outsider will recognize that in Christianity the reality of God is experienced in a new way.
The revelation of God in Christ is not the imparting of
a new idea of God; it is a fresh unveiling of the Reality to which ideas, new and old, with greater or less adequacy, apply.
An immediate objection to the suggestion of
a new idea of God will doubtless be that the term God as defined by usage properly means the God of the religious tradition.
Not exact matches
It is easier to defend the
idea that the bible is not the word
of god, but simply a history
of human thought and just as we discard old scientific
ideas when we have
new information, we discard old philosophical
ideas.
The
idea was to work» nonviolently and within the constraints
of Lutheran two - kingdoms warnings against illusions
of earthly
new Jerusalems» toward a politics that might provide a better approximation
of the kingdom
of God proleptically revealed in the life and ministry
of Jesus
of Nazareth.
Since those process categories have been connected with
ideas of God inspired by the Bible, process theologians believe there is a chance in the twenty - first century to bring the long separated parts
of human understanding into a
new, coherent relationship.
The Jews, therefore, outgrew the original narrowness
of their tribal
ideas of God, not only, as we saw in the last chapter, because
of a
new extensiveness
of vision in the direction
of an international faith, but also because
of a
new intensiveness
of experience in the direction
of an individual faith.
Now, thanks to his technology, man has acquired power, has got rid
of his guardians and
of the
idea of God's fatherhood, and at the same time has acquired a
new, a rational and scientific mentality.
Related to this, the
idea of being born (Gk., gennaō) in John's letter is the way he is describing the
new life which all believers share with
God and through which we come to know Him more intimately.
Thus the Commission called for a Christian concern for Higher Education which helps critical rational and humanist evaluation
of both the western and Indian cultures to build a
new cultural concept which subordinated religious traditions, technology and politics to personal values according to the principle «Sabbath is made for man and not man for the Sabbath», enunciated by Jesus and illustrated in the
idea of Incarnation
of God in Christ.
It will be seen that the
new doctrine requires careful and somewhat elaborate distinctions, and yet, if some
of its supporters are right, the doctrine is nothing at all but the analysis
of the simple
idea that
God is «the perfectly loving individual,» in all respects possessed
of the properties which this
idea requires, even if non-perfection in some respects be among the requirements.
Yet through all these diversities
of phrasing — whether faith was thought
of as a power - releasing confidence in
God, or as selfcommitment to Christ that brought the divine Spirit into indwelling control
of one's life, or as the power by which we apprehend the eternal and invisible even while living in the world
of sense, or as the climactic vision
of Christ as the Son
of God which crowns our surrender to his attractiveness, or as assured conviction concerning great truths that underlie and constitute the gospel — always the enlargement and enrichment
of faith was opening
new meanings in the experience
of fellowship with
God and was influencing deeply both the
idea and the practice
of prayer.
There is for them only one
God — he is holy, his land is holy, his nation is to be a holy people — and while the indiscriminate mixture
of moral and ceremonial elements carries over old
ideas even while it ventures into
new ones, there is an evident elevation
of the
idea of holiness into terms
of the divine majesty, and
of the Most High's exclusive claim on man s devotion.
In this column we hope to chronicle some
of the statements and initiatives that, by the grace
of God and in accordance with
ideas articulated by the Second Vatican Council, are aimed at the «
New Evangelisation»
of our culture.
Yes, in particular, it is LUDICROUS that this «
god» «chose» an arrogant people in a Middle Eastern desert at a time when there was no internet and when those people thought the world was flat and consisted
of the Mediterranean Sea and its surrounding lands (i.e., they had NO
IDEA about the «
New World», Antarctica.
I sometimes have wondered if the more Deist or Spinoza
god concept could be followed to the
idea that a creative force jump - started this universe only to move on to a
new project, maybe never to return, but I like the notion that such a creative force might still be around but perhaps, building on your notion, re-inventing itself and perhaps expanding the internal complexity
of this universe as well as time goes on.
For instance, a hypothetical public high school teacher who advanced
New Age
ideas and attitudes under a neutral or secular wrapping would be far less vulnerable to legal challenge than would be a teacher who spoke
of God by name or who expounded on the biblical foundations
of Western thought.
Schilling observes that Bloch's
idea of the homeland sounds much like what the
New Testament calls the Kingdom
of God.
Bultmann seized these
ideas because he saw in them a portrait
of man without
God, and because they seemed likely to awaken man to the possibility
of hearing the answer to his existential question in the
New Testament.
This essay was reprinted under the title «Brightman's Theory
of the Given and His
Idea of God,» in Hartshorne's Creativity in American Philosophy (
New York: Paragon House, 1984), 196 - 204.
I think the
idea of man invading another country enforcing his will on the people goes against the
new testament teachings that reserve that power for
God the father only.
The
idea of a
God who not only sympathizes with all we feel and endure for our fellow men, but who will pour
new life into our too languid love, and give firmness to our vacillating purpose, is an extension and multiplication
of the effects produced by human sympathy.
In the book, I argue that it makes sense that if there's a
God who loves and there's a
God who created sex — which is an interesting
idea in
of itself — that what
God has to say about this topic is important, and common sense actually supports the
New Testament as it relates to sex.
In Kierkegaard's earlier works are found the germ
of some
of Buber's most important early and later
ideas: the direct relation between the individual and
God in which the individual addresses
God as «Thou,» the insecure and exposed state
of every individual as an individual, the concept
of the «knight
of faith» who can not take shelter in the universal but must constantly risk all in the concrete uniqueness
of each
new situation, the necessity
of becoming a true person before going out to relation, and the importance
of realizing one's belief in one's life.
What emerged was a deistic philosophy in which the
ideas of sin and
God receded in favor
of new social control mechanisms provided by law and legitimated by conceptions
of the lawfulness
of nature.
The
idea, therefore,
of a covenant as the foundation charter (so to speak)
of the people
of God was very much alive at the time, and there can be no doubt what Jesus had in mind when he invited his followers to drink
of the cup
of the covenant: he was formally installing them as foundation members
of the
new people
of God.
But if you want to introduce a whole
new criticism that you don't believe the Bible is what Christians believe it is, you are
of course also wrong, and simply blindly railing against the
idea of religious authority and expertise because,
God forbid someone else suggest to you what is right or divinely inspired because that might limit your imaginary freedom and insult your nonexistent expertise and intelligence.
But in Beyond Humanism and elsewhere he expresses the
idea that the
new conception
of God is not only philosophically superior to that
of classical philosophies and theologies, it is also theologically and religiously more adequate in that it is much more compatible with the Biblical
idea of God as love.
In the 17th century, the
ideas of the Reformation were spreading throughout the world and the Church did not accept very graciously the
new scientific
ideas that mixed themselves with
God and religion.
I shall emphasize this awareness as
God - given, not self - generated: but in our present experience
God works in and through our thoughts and aspirations — inspiring
new ideas, certainly, but building these upon the foundations
of previous
ideas, not out
of a vacuum.
In this scheme the quantifiers «all,» «some,» and «none» are combined with the
ideas of «absolute perfection,» «relative perfection,» and «imperfection'to produce seven different conceptions
of deity which are conveniently grouped into three broad types
of theism: classical theism, within which
God is conceived as absolutely perfect in all respects and in no way surpassable; atheistic views, in which there is no being which is in any respect perfect or unsurpassable; and the «
new theism,» in which
God is in some respects perfect and unsurpassable by others but is surpassable by himself.
I'm a little
newer than you in my journey away from organized religion and while I may get to where you are, I'm trying not to throw the entire
idea of God out the window along with organized religion.
The Jewish scholar Uriel Tal was mistaken when he wrote that the
idea of God's continued covenant with the Jews «is
of course contrary to the theology
of the
New Testament.
That
idea is only contrary to the church's false claims
of being the «
New Israel,» replacing and superseding
God's covenant relationship with the Jews.
Again we are to see it as implicit ever since the origin
of the simplest forms
of the belief in a national
god; but, like the covenant
idea itself, it attained an exaltation such as to make
of it a
new thing.
There is a quite remarkable converging
of Christian thinking today, including
New Testament studies, on the
idea that the powers
of the kingdom
of God are already present within history.
(Adventures
of Ideas,
New York: The Free Press, 1967, 169) He also rejects the conception
of God as «the one supreme reality, omnipotently disposing a wholly derivative world.»
The
idea that man was made in the image
of God was an affront to the belief that Soviet power could make a
New Man.
It seems to me that the strongest
New Testament basis for hope for society is to be seen in the broad implications
of this
idea that the redemptive power;
of the kingdom
of God are present in history.
(Adventures
of Ideas,
New York: The Free Press, 1967, 166) William Christian notes that»... the real target
of this criticism is the view that
God is omnificent, that all effective agency in the universe is to be ascribed to
God.
Indeed, the task for the subjects
of theological education may be as much the making
of new forms
of relationships to
God, self, others, traditions and society as the articulation
of right
ideas.
Nonetheless, ordinary Catholics within a state
of grace are heirs to the Kingdom
of God, and the graced imagination's
new ideas and solutions to difficult problems, are evident in the daily course
of events that occur in school, work, families or, as Pope Francis hopes, creative solutions to the environmental crises.
(ENTIRE BOOK) A clear and helpful explanation
of the development
of key
ideas within the Old and
New Testament including the
idea of God, man, right and wrong, suffering, paryer and immortality.
The meta - narrative as it is often referred to is the
idea that from the begining
of time,
God with perfect foreknowledge planned to create a
new thing to reveal parts
of His nature that were not yet revealed.
It's all quite thought - provoking... as are my other crazy ponderings about
God being bi-polar with His grandiose violent behavior in the Old Testament and somewhat paradoxical catatonic tranquility in the
New or my atheist son's
idea that
God, if he exists at all, certainly exhibits traits
of narcissistic personality disorder.
My fancy 100,000 word answer turned out to be little more than a long way
of saying, «I have no
idea how to reconcile the violence
of God in the Old Testament with the self - sacrificial love
of Jesus Christ in the
New while still maintaining a conservative view
of inspiration and inerrancy.»
This was not a
new idea from Jesus as care and compassion began with
Gods creation
of man in the first place.
Many will tell you that you will get drunk if you don't find
god, but the truth is I have seen people stay sober by having large displacements
of old
ideas with
new ones.
I felt like I not only uncovered something true about my own self but that I connected with
God in a whole
new way, my
ideas of God and life were hung out on the line in the bright sunshine
of this
new vocation.